I don't go over there and complain about SHH at all. I air my dirty laundry where it needs to be cleaned -- in this case, SHH. But, overall, I find myself not posting that much anymore just due to the inabilty to find rational discussion.
Listen, you can say you try, but when there is a thread just below this one that has a four page dicussion about whether or not Superman raped Lois, I have to ask myself if these boards are being properly moderated. And when I respond in anger at such an idiotic and offensive dicsussion even taken place, and get reprimanded for doing so, I'm going to say something.
I have no problem if someone wants to come here and say, "I disliked Singer's Superman because I felt that it was too melodramatic and that the familiar elements really made the movie a bit of a bore, and I personally just wanted an action film and this didn't deliever that for me." I cannot stomach people saying, "Singer's a ****ing ****ty ass director who fregging turned Superman into some emo ***** with a bastard child! Way to ruin Superman!"
There is a distinct difference between those two statements. Distinct. The first one is someone expressing their displeasure while containing it to themselves, and doing so in a way that makes them OWN their opinion, and not graft it out onto a non-existent universal audience. The second statement is someone turning their opinion and preferences into a matter of aesthetic fact, deriving from that multiple judgements on the director's character, the character's integrity, and the legacy as a whole.
One is an educated opinion from someone who disliked the movie, the other is the nonsensical stuff of many SHH posts.