J. J. Jameson
There and back again.
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2006
- Messages
- 2,909
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Like I've said so many times before....
LOL @ CANADA!
LOL @ CANADA!
Fred_Fury said:Hey Quebecois, we're in north america, SPEAK THE LANGUAGE![]()


War Lord said:It will happen, if not this time, then perhaps next time.
A nation ultimately cannot stand when a significant portion of the population wants out.
We should work harder at pushing Quebec out.


triplefive said:I don't get how you're reading this article and getting that Quebec will be anything other than a province with a different title. They already do their pension plans separate from the rest of the country, they tax separately, use a different judicial system and they administrate separately.
It's just semantics, and an attempt for the Tories to gain favour where they've lost some. Quebec isn't going anywhere.
Themanofbat said:Any proposals on how we can get rid of you???![]()
![]()
![]()
War Lord said:I disagree. The more separate parts of a nation become, whether in practical terms or just symbolic terms, the more likely that the nation will break up.

Themanofbat said:Kind of like Harper can ok all the oil company restraints that Alberta insists upon, yet will fight against the same rights for Newfoundland... because the oil companies don't want the restraints.
![]()
![]()
![]()
There's nothing practical about this political decision. Everyone knows that. And the symbolic difference means nothing. It's like Yukon, NWT and Nunavut. Even the Bloq isn't fooled by that.War Lord said:I disagree. The more separate parts of a nation become, whether in practical terms or just symbolic terms, the more likely that the nation will break up.
War Lord said:I can be bought cheap. Just mail me a certified cheque for about $50 million and I'll be gone the day after I cash it.

War Lord said:How is that relevent?

triplefive said:There's nothing practical about this political decision. Everyone knows that. And the symbolic difference means nothing. It's like Yukon, NWT and Nunavut. Even the Bloq isn't fooled by that.
They're going to keep fighting but they're not going to get their way.
Themanofbat said:Alberta gets "special treatment"... which is what your against Quebec having.
Get it?
![]()
![]()
![]()
What I meant was, do you think the creation Nunavut really changed things that much up there? The federal budget is distributed differently but I doubt spending has changed much from before.War Lord said:The Yukon, NWT, and Nunavut are the responsibility of the federal government because they are territories, not provinces.
Quebec is a province and it won't take long for this supposedly symbolic move to become quite practical and concrete.
triplefive said:What I meant was, do you think the creation Nunavut really changed things that much up there? The federal budget is distributed differently but I doubt spending has changed much from before.
No constipation jokes after this = another dead holiday at the Hype.jonty said:We should work harder at pushing Quebec out.

No, because no other province is in remotely the same situation.War Lord said:Would you really be saying the same thing if the feds consented to any other province being a nation within a nation? Would you really say that nothing has changed?
I personally support a decentralized Canada, because that was the way it was set up. However, that still meant that provinces were still provinces.
Probably because nobody could be bothered to read through this thread. Who cares about Canada on American Thanksgiving?Wilhelm-Scream said:No constipation jokes after this = another dead holiday at the Hype.![]()

triplefive said:No, because no other province is in remotely the same situation.
The formation of Quebec was completely distinctive from the rest of the country. And at present, the province is already different in nearly all of the ways that it counts.
Anyway, I'm bored of you. Move to the States and call it a day.
Probably because nobody could be bothered to read through this thread. Who cares about Canada on American Thanksgiving?![]()
Multipartisanship is a cornerstone of our country. Being Conservative has absolutely NOTHING to do with it.War Lord said:You're incorrect on this one. Alberta, for example, is very much a distinct province in its own way. We're far more conservative than the rest of Canada, for example. And every other province is just as distinct as any other.
War Lord said:Resources belong to the provinces, not the feds. There is no special treatment that Alberta is getting that it's not already entitled to.
The only thing Danny Williams is fighting the feds is trying to keep his federal subsidy and the oil revenues.

Matt said:Canada will never be annexed. The population is too big, which means it would create several new states and drastically change the set up of both Congress and the electoral college, factor that in with too much of a cultural difference and the fact that it will screw over too many politicians and possibly even lead to a prominent third party.
Never gonna happen.

Themanofbat said:Not to mention that the American Government can't be bothered with our internal bickering.
The Americans have the perfect scenario going.... we self governement ourselves, and we take care (or attempt to) of our troubles, and as long as we don't stir the pot too much, the US leaves us alone. In the meantime, the US continually test their weapons in the North and can basically do what they want here... but they like to make us think that we are our own Nation that can act and think for itself.
![]()
![]()
![]()
War Lord said:It will happen, if not this time, then perhaps next time.
A nation ultimately cannot stand when a significant portion of the population wants out.
We should work harder at pushing Quebec out.