Yup, that one.
One of my favourite wolverine stories.
And watching the movie makes me wish they had used even more The Origin elements
Yup, that one.
One of my favourite wolverine stories.
And watching the movie makes me wish they had used even more The Origin elements
-Lack of diversity in art style. There are many good artists working for Marvel and DC, but the companies have too much of a uniform look to their books. For every great, unique artist, there are 10 solid but not distinct ones. I don't think that problem is unique to modern comics, but it's worth noting.
Not too keen on:
*lesbian Bat-woman and for that matter all gay DC and Marvel superheros.
*"race changing" i.e. black/hispanic Spider-man, Nick Fury.
*changing characters classic costumes i.e. Nighcrawler, Storm, Mockingbird, Wolverine, too many Marvel/DC characters to name.
-Lack of diversity in art style. There are many good artists working for Marvel and DC, but the companies have too much of a uniform look to their books. For every great, unique artist, there are 10 solid but not distinct ones. I don't think that problem is unique to modern comics, but it's worth noting.
Bad writing?Wolverines "Origins" : sad sweeping epic about a sickly, frail, frock-wearing, victorian rich boy that had an abusive daddy and grew up to be big and strong and hairy and beat up an overwieght pot-bellied cook with a tiny hat? That story was *horrible* not to mention the crappy story book style digital art. No strong pencils or skilled brush and pen work...just dreary color. Where was the excitment? the Marvel style action? Where was Wolverine/Logan? Wolverine's is a story best left mostly to one's IMAGINATION. To the best of my recollection it established: 1) Never mind pure adamantium claws Wolverine had little screwy bone claws FIRST (that "erupted at puberty" no less!) 2) It established that Wolverine actually has a thing for redheads, yep, it's no coincidence he had the "hots" for Jean Grey...WOW! 3) Boy was rich! 4) Ran around with real live wolves. 5) Wolverines age (why did we need to know that?) 6) He has a real name and it's James Hooowwwlett! get it Howl-ett! 7) Wolverine had a real Mommy and Daddy.
BAD writing....just bad. A dressed up turd is still a turd. Slick paper and dreary 'state-of-the-art' computer color (ugh and ugh.) can not hide that.
And the WOLVERINE movie was a frik-frak of badly excecuted ideas; Characters doing...something, shooting off sarcasm to each other, but having no good reason being together from the word go. Doing an adaptation of the comic would have been a VERY dull Wolverine movie.
Um, why don't you like gay characters? Bat-Woman is a fantastic character.
Also, Spider-Man's race wasn't changed, Miles Morales is a brand new character.
I really, REALLY hope you're reading Daredevil right now.
I cannot accept a major gay/lesbian superhero in a mainstream Marvel or DC book. Must everything from the real world show up in todays comics? Reed and Sue Richards, Vision and Scarlett Witch, Hawkeye and Mockingbird, Peter and MJ etc. Let's just touch upon the love between a man and a woman and leave it at that. I have enjoyed reading Love and Rockets, The Authority, and other books where gay characters show up....but in a Marvel (or DC ) book it's silly...and usually badly excecuted.(see Northstar from Alpha Flight). The sexual aspect comes off as a little too much information for a comic book hero. Guys that fight alongside Batman, Wolverine and Thor don't...go to gay bars etc.
[YT]Qh2sWSVRrmo[/YT]
Hahahaha! Vision and Scarlet Witch!
Not sure what your post means and I can't quite hear what the cartoon character is saying.
I cannot accept a major gay/lesbian superhero in a mainstream Marvel or DC book. Must everything from the real world show up in todays comics? Reed and Sue Richards, Vision and Scarlett Witch, Hawkeye and Mockingbird, Peter and MJ etc. Let's just touch upon the love between a man and a woman and leave it at that. I don't want to see two women or two guys in a lip lock. I have enjoyed reading Love and Rockets, (and in more recent years) The Authority, and other books where gay characters show up....but in a Marvel (or DC ) book it's silly...and usually badly excecuted.(see Northstar from Alpha Flight). The sexual aspect comes off as a little too much information for a comic book hero. Guys that fight alongside Batman, Wolverine, or Thor don't...go to gay bars etc.
Sorry!
Miles Morales is now Spider-man(actually the only Spiderman should be Steve Ditko's/Stan Lee's Peter Parker.) Yep, now we're being served yet another Spiderman in addition to the various clones etc- further "de-uniquing" the character and the original idea. If they were going to do a black/hispanic character why not create something brand new? Do the writers lack the chops to create interesting characters that are unique in there own right?
Ok, the artwork was great, exelent, and i don't understand what makes you think it is so bad in it considering that the 90s were a place of really terrible artwork in comics like Wolverine too.You did and that picture of Capatain Picard with his head down doesn't mean anything to me.
I really, REALLY hope you're reading Daredevil right now.
Sure, but that whole thing cut and dry has been about humans and mutants...in simplified terms.