gambitfire
Superhero
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2006
- Messages
- 6,478
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 56
Exceptions always exist depending on the situation 


afan said:You see this is the argument that I just don't understand, in the real world Batman, Superman, Spiderman etc, do not exist. The whole fabric of the super-hero universe is founded in fantasy, where the fantastic is the ordinary.
For me a design based on the "real world concept" is flawed from it's inception. In a real world environ do you really envision that Spider-Man could actually dodge the bullet spray from an automatic weapon.
Working from the "one bullet takes him down" scenario make the adventures of Indiana Jones, James Bond, and John McLaine impossible. Why aren't these characters hamstrung by the same real world ball and chain that The Batman is subjected to?
excellent point.afan said:Working from the "one bullet takes him down" scenario make the adventures of Indiana Jones, James Bond, and John McLaine impossible. Why aren't these characters hamstrung by the same real world ball and chain that The Batman is subjected to?
Batman Dead End? I love it but its a fan film and i'd never want to see that in a feature film.blind_fury said:With a million dollars I'm sure you can make a damn good cloth batsuit.
This one wasn't half bad it probably cost less than one tumbler tire: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XEaHA-ZBSk&search=batman dead
lolJokerNick said:Batman's suit is fine, his chest armor is awesome
he does tho, need a storage unit for, Urine and fecile matter... what's a bat to do when he's got some gwano poking out, and he's in the middle of a fight...???

Batman doesn't agree.Steelsheen said:they can definitely improve on the material the Batsuit is made from, BB suit and the SR suit are supposed to be made from the same material right? but the SR suit is definitely a lot more flexible now than the BB suit back then, so i'm sure they can find a "middle ground" keeping the benefits of both the latex and the rubber suits.
afan said:You see this is the argument that I just don't understand, in the real world Batman, Superman, Spiderman etc, do not exist. The whole fabric of the super-hero universe is founded in fantasy, where the fantastic is the ordinary.
For me a design based on the "real world concept" is flawed from it's inception. In a real world environ do you really envision that Spider-Man could actually dodge the bullet spray from an automatic weapon.
Working from the "one bullet takes him down" scenario make the adventures of Indiana Jones, James Bond, and John McLaine impossible. Why aren't these characters hamstrung by the same real world ball and chain that The Batman is subjected to?
Lobster Charlie said:You're comparing Spider-Man (a superhero) to Batman (a normal guy in a bat costume).
Batman HAS to be told in the real world, because he isn't a super-hero. And the charm of Indiana Jones is the fact that he just barely makes it, every time, and we can feel that *real world* danger. It's just out of reach for us, but familiar enough to keep us engrossed.
But, to answer your question---do I imagine Spiderman being able to dodge bullet spray? I'll ask you this: ever notice how hard it is to hit a fly sometimes? I imagine Spiderman would move something like that in the real world. Faster than we can fathom, thus making him all the more "super."
Retroman said:Batman doesn't agree.
![]()
Considering Spider-Man's powers, yes. He could dodge all, or atlest most, of the rounds fired from an automatic.
Those movies suffer from the cliche 'magic bullets' that the good guys either easily dodge or can take a dozen and still carry on with slightly less energy while the bad guys go down in one shot.
lol. I'm okay thank you.Steelsheen said:huh? you ok Retro? if you dont want to strike a middle ground then what do you want? Batpajamas?
blind_fury said:He's the goddam Batman!
McGourgh said:
afan said:Are you doubting your own conviction here.
In the Batman real world restriction, "it only takes one."
Boy you'll have to define your intent with the term "suffer" here, Raiders of the Lost Ark and Die Hard are supremely successful action / adventure films and arguably two of the best films of the genre.
blind_fury said:So John McClane can take on an entire league of sophisticated terrorist half-naked and bare foot but Batman can't. That's lame dude. He's the goddam Batman!
Batman made way too many mistakes in Batman Begins. Nobody wants to see Batman screw up so many times. Batman is put in a situation 99% of us would die in and he gets out of it using lifetime of crimefighting training. He's the goddam Batman!
and nobody's going to be laughing at the Dead End costume when their bones are shattered and they're spitting out teeth. He's the goddam Batman!
"Is it 100% cotton?"Katsuro said:Yeah, but I expect afterwards there'll be a lot of "lol, remember when Jimmy got beat up by that guy wearin' pajamas!". And whatdya you think Gordon'll say, Batman shows up in spandex?
"So, I see you ditched the protective armor..."
"yeah, well you know, this is more.. comic accurate"
"comic what?"
"um.. i mean... it breathes nicer. Yeah, that's it."
Retroman said:lol. I'm okay thank you.![]()
The suit looks fine on screen but it does appear that the his neck isn't as mobile as it should be and i do agree that the material should be a little more flexible. Its difficult to do though; to make the material less 'heavy' without making it appear as if Batman would not get hurt in a fight or if he was shot.It's still a 'real world' in Nolans films.
![]()
Steelsheen said:that's why i metnioned the "middle ground" between the "rubber suit" and the spandex, which is what the SR suit is, its an improved version of the same material used for the BB suit-- it gives the actor amazing flexibility. now of course you still want it to look like armour, but you can achieve that with the right coloration and design without "teh puffy" effects that the BB suit has been criticized over
![]()
The only thing revisionist is changing Batman's costume from what it has always been, to a bulbous rubber suit. Batman's costume shouldn't be skintight, and it should have some protection, but it should still clearly look like fabric tights. And no, that does not mean spandex. Why does everyone pretend they haven't seen SPIDER-MAN or SUPERMAN RETURNS? The material to make a great looking and faithful batsuit is out there. They need to use it.Mysterio said:i'm going to let you in on a little secret:
there is no need for any of your spray-on kevlar, revisionist threads. in fact, from what i've seen so far, there is likely no need for any of your threads.
afan said:Working from the "one bullet takes him down" scenario make the adventures of Indiana Jones, James Bond, and John McLaine impossible. Why aren't these characters hamstrung by the same real world ball and chain that The Batman is subjected to?
Katsuro said:As I've said before, I want anyone who wants a cloth suit to watch Begins again, and tell me how many times he would have died without his armored suit.
xxshady said:Fools Nolan goes through all that trouble to make a better batsuit and you dont even appreciate it?
Shoemeister said:^ Seriously!! I mean you people just don't stop whining. The movies are not going to match your every EXACT personal standard. Stop making new threads and SHUT THE F**K UP!
batmaluco said:This is only a matter of personal preferences. Some people thinks that the suit must resemble what is seen in comics. Others think that it looks silly when in a live action film.