Don't get me wrong, I love Stan Lee--he's a great creator and is probably one of the most likable guys in the world--but I have to admit, it's almost too easy to parody his writing style.
In Stan's defense, though, he's not the worst canidate--imagine if some members of the Hype wrote it. It would only be about Dr. Manhattan's wang and how he defeats Viedt by pouring hot radioactive piss into his mouth.
But it's not like he ever said he could write Watchmen better than Moore did, so why is there a need to criticize his writing style?
Don't get me wrong, I love Stan Lee--he's a great creator and is probably one of the most likable guys in the world--but I have to admit, it's almost too easy to parody his writing style.
In Stan's defense, though, he's not the worst canidate--imagine if some members of the Hype wrote it. It would only be about Dr. Manhattan's wang and how he defeats Viedt by pouring hot radioactive piss into his mouth.
SpiderMan;12402974 said:Writing style aside, it's the man's (Stan Lee's) creativity that wouldn't be easy to imitate. I know it was in collaboration with other great artists but he was the impetus for all of the big silver age Marvel successes.
Better question: what if Alan Moore had written FF#1, AF #15, etc.?
Stan Lee is one of the most overrated men in comics, oh how I hate the bastard