I'm pretty sure he's a journalist even while in Alaska, in the flashbacks.
The original script had him in Africa during his freelance journalist days during a political coup where violence broke out.
He "Will Not" become a Journalist until the end of the film, and I can guarantee that! Mark my words, and don't ask me how I know, I just do.
![]()
This thread is not the thing that's pointless. You're posts are
Can someone please remind me to quote Ether's posts next year when we've all seen the film, and Clark is clearly doing freelance work before even becoming Superman.
I'd really enjoy having a good laugh about it.![]()
was'nt this set pic of him as a freelance reporter?
i thought it was
![]()
I just came on here SOOO Happy to see that you quoted me, as I feel your one of my great friends, and then I read you RIPPED me a new one!!! LOL
EXACTLY what you said... Clark is doing freelance work before becoming Superman...EXACTLY!!!
He is NOT Superman yet, he is not a reporter yet, he does not know who he is in life! His dad passes in the tornado, he feels guilty that he could NOT save his dad, so out of guilt he travals from Job to Job, not able to make anything of himself because others think he is a FREAK!
This is as far as I'm am going with what I know, feel free to quote me a year from now PLEASE!!!! I come on SHH! almost daily, so I will be here, and if I'm wrong.... Well, I won't be, thats for you to make my "Fake" punishment for mehehe
So whats my Punishment if I'm wrong?
Everything else you've said is pretty obvious if you've been keeping up with all the info (though you might wanna spoiler tag parts of it for people who don't wanna know
I think people need to stop being apologetic about Superman. Yes he wears trunks over his costume..... he is Superman. Yes he wears glasses to conceal his identity.... he is Superman. Yes.. he flys... HE IS FREAKIN SUPERMAN.
Why are we accommodating the general public who aren't familiar with the Superman mytho. It's like if the filmmakers are saying,"hey sorry general public that Superman is looking this way and sometimes doesn't make sense.. we will change it for you guys and all the Superman fans out there will just have to accept because...well.... they have no choice."
I think the audience would be more turned off if he started wearing a wig and a fake beard.
It depends on what they're trying to do. If they want to ground everything in realism (and they probably do), a fake wig and beard would make sense, and the audience will go along with it. If, on the other hand, they want it to be as comic book-y as The Avengers, it might seem out of place.
They aren't going to put a fake wig and beard on him... I actually can't see how they'd do that without it coming off comical.
I mean, I can just see it now. Instead of a shirt rip, Supes majestically rips off his stick on beard and wig![]()
The thing is, if we're talking pure realism, the only logical way of truly concealing his identity would be to wear a mask over his face when he's in costume.
But if you don't understand WHY he doesn't do that, and why it's so important to the character and the story to not cover his face as the hero (which is why he has to have a much more complicated disguise than just an actual physical disguise because, well, journalists don't wear actual masks over their face) then you've really missed something.
I don't expect this to be as "comic-book-y" as Avengers, not by a long shot. But having Superman walk around in a fake beard and wig is just stupid, far more than if it were just a pair of specs.
When Zod attacks, Clark's going to run out of the Daily Planet, or wherever, make good use of these...
and then change into his Superman suit. Very "Superman", don't you think?
I don't know what other posters here think but I would laugh if Clark Kent uses a wig and a beard to disguise himself.
Rather than reinventing his disguise what if he continues to wears glasses but works at some place where he will not meet many people for example as a cook in a restaurant or as a truck driver. (and he can continue to work as a freelance reporter for a website, so that not many will see his face.)
This solves the problem of how Clark never gets recognized by Perry, lois and other people who work at the Daily Planet office.
It's just that any attempt to make his actual physical disguise too 'big', IMO would be comical.
The best thing you can do, is underplay the 'ridiculous' nature of the disguise. Have it be something the audience KNOWS would never work in real life, but they accept that it is simply representing something within the story and doesn't need to have real life application.
Even in Smallville, where he'd been walking around without glasses, even working at the Daily Planet without glasses for years!
I don't know what other posters here think but I would laugh if Clark Kent uses a wig and a beard to disguise himself.
Rather than reinventing his disguise what if he continues to wears glasses but works at some place where he will not meet many people for example as a cook in a restaurant or as a truck driver. (and he can continue to work as a freelance reporter for a website, so that not many will see his face.)
This solves the problem of how Clark never gets recognized by Perry, lois and other people who work at the Daily Planet office.
All that said: I have no doubt they're going the traditional route. They're just going to explain how and why it works. And there's nothing wrong with that.
Then what are we actually disagreeing about?![]()
I've said tonnes of times, that there are ideas they can explore as to why the simple glasses disguise works. And audiences can swallow them or not, but I don't doubt they would try to weave some kind of explanation for why the glasses work in there.
They can play with ideas of hiding in plain sight, being cloaked by people's own assumption that Superman is an alien who just showed up and doesn't have a human life, and that the idea of him dressing up as a human and working in an office is too ridiculous for anyone to even entertain the idea that CK might be Superman even though he does look like him. The fact that no one really gets that close a look at him anyway, other than Lois, and she is blinded by her own infatuation with a fantasy.
The AVENGERS IS NOT COMICBOOKY. I cant stress this enough.Marvel studios have changed a lot of components in their films from comicbooks.From cotumes,to certain storylines. For example the Cosmic CUBE IN MCU is quite different from the comic version even though they look the same.aAvengers is the fastest grossing movie in history. Very "comic-booky" as are the partnering franchises, perhaps the general audience disagrees with you.
.