There isn't much that they got right... But mostly, it's
Cyclops that ruins the experience for me.
Most of my major complaints have already been mentioned, but let me expand.
I don't understand singer. Cyclops is a character that I think has a lot of personality traits similar to Superman. They are both strong moral types and natural leaders.
So why would he do NOTHING with cyclops, and then jump ship to go do a Superman film?
And I really mean he did NOTHING with him. Cyclops had no storyline. He was side character in Jean and Wolverine's storyline. He had no backstory, he had no relevance other than furthering their plots.
Exactly. It's a story that naturally lends itself to being Scott central! And as Evil Clare said, it would have made much more sense to have each film have a different character focus.
Have Wolverine and Rogue the focus of the first film (though I think Rogue should have been Jubilee, because the personality suited her much much better).
Have Night Crawler and Jean the focus of the second film.
Have Scott, Jean and Xavier the focus of the last film.
And for each, a different villain. Because having the same villain in every sequel is just a bit strange.
Really REALLY dissapointed we didn't see more of the sentinels than a training simulation. Would have loved to have seen them crashing after Jubille through a Mall like that scene in the cartoon
I felt really defensive... literally, when he died, I was like 'Hey, hey now, that's not fair, you can't do that to him!'
Both X-men and Spiderman majorly needed rebooting, especially in the way of TDK, which proved that you don't need to glamourize superhero movies with humour, big names and made up love stories.
Unfortunately, they only saw fit to reboot one
Couldn't give a damn how long he was on screen for, his characterisation was the worst I have EVER seen. I mean, there really wasn't any... at all!