Which decade had the best "Best Pictures"?

CrAzYMoFo

Sidekick
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Messages
1,583
Reaction score
0
Points
31
1960: The Apartment
61: West Side Story
62: Lawrence of Arabia
63: Tom Jones
64: My Fair Lady
65: The Sound of Music
66: A Man for All Seasons
67: In the Heart of the Night
68: Oliver!
69: Midnight Cowboy

1970: Patton
71: The French Connection
72: The Godfather
73: The Sting
74: The Godfather, Part II
75: One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
76: Rocky
77: Annie Hall
78: The Deer Hunter
79: Kramer vs Kramer

1980: Ordinary People
81: Chariots of Fire
82: Gandhi
83: Terms of Endearment
84: Amadeus
85: Out of Africa
86: Platoon
87: The Last Emperor
88: Rain Man
89: Driving Miss Daisy

1990: Dances with Wolves
91: The Silence of the Lambs
92: Unforgiven
93: Schindler's List
94: Forrest Gump
95: Braveheart
96: The English Patient
97: Titanic
98: Shakespeare In Love
99: American Beauty

2000: Gladiator
01: A Beautiful Mind
02: Chicago
03: The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
04: Million Dollar Baby
05: Crash
 
The nineties overall sucked.
But the best pictures at the oscars are probably some of the best in cinematic history.
Except for English Patient.
Like Elaine in Seinfeld said-It's boring, makes me fall asleep, and is too long.
 
I'd say 70s. 60s had some great stuff (A Man for all Seasons is pretty much my favorite movie), and I love some of the 90s ones (Silence of the Lambs, Braveheart), but the 70s had no real low point.
 
CrAzYMoFo said:
1960: The Apartment
61: West Side Story
62: Lawrence of Arabia
63: Tom Jones
64: My Fair Lady
65: The Sound of Music
66: A Man for All Seasons
67: In the Heart of the Night
68: Oliver!
69: Midnight Cowboy

1970: Patton
71: The French Connection
72: The Godfather
73: The Sting
74: The Godfather, Part II
75: One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
76: Rocky
77: Annie Hall
78: The Deer Hunter
79: Kramer vs Kramer

1980: Ordinary People
81: Chariots of Fire
82: Gandhi
83: Terms of Endearment
84: Amadeus
85: Out of Africa
86: Platoon
87: The Last Emperor
88: Rain Man
89: Driving Miss Daisy

1990: Dances with Wolves
91: The Silence of the Lambs
92: Unforgiven
93: Schindler's List
94: Forrest Gump
95: Braveheart
96: The English Patient
97: Titanic
98: Shakespeare In Love
99: American Beauty

2000: Gladiator
01: A Beautiful Mind
02: Chicago
03: The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
04: Million Dollar Baby
05: Crash

VERY good question. :up:

2000s aren't quite as solid, Beautiful Mind? Chicago? Crash?

1990's are great.

1980's are great.

1970's are faultless.

1960's are all classics.

So I can't tell you the best, but the worst is the 2000s. So far.
 
1990's. *Cough*ISTILLTHINKPULPFICTIONSHOULDHAVEWONBESTPICTUREIN1995*COUGH!* Uggh, I have to do something about that cough.
 
Batattack said:
1990's. *Cough*ISTILLTHINKPULPFICTIONSHOULDHAVEWONBESTPICTUREIN1995*COUGH!* Uggh, I have to do something about that cough.

Yeah, and a lot of people say Se7en should have won in 1996.
 
The 1970s', which were the best decade for cinema in general.

The 1990s' were flawed as heck. Goodfellas should've won for 1990 and Pulp Fiction or Shawshank should've got the gold for '94.
 
Kevin Roegele said:
VERY good question. :up:

2000s aren't quite as solid, Beautiful Mind? Chicago? Crash?

1990's are great.

1980's are great.

1970's are faultless.

1960's are all classics.

So I can't tell you the best, but the worst is the 2000s. So far.

I wouldn't call the '70s faultless. Annie Hall never should have won over Taxi Driver.
 
1970's GodFather
1980's Scarface
1990's 3 great one Goodfellas,Casino,Pulp Fiction
2000's LOTR..
 
JLBats said:
I wouldn't call the '70s faultless. Annie Hall never should have won over Taxi Driver.

Um, they were released a year apart from each other. Rocky beat out Taxi Driver. Annie Hall beat out Star Wars.
 
ANTHONYNASTI said:
Um, they were released a year apart from each other. Rocky beat out Taxi Driver. Annie Hall beat out Star Wars.

Oh, right, duh, drunk here. Annie Hall never should have beat Star Wars, Rock never should have beat Taxi Driver.

Than it becomes faultless:up:
 
Also, in 1991, JFK should've won over Silence. Not that Silence isn't a great film, but JFK was much more relevant and provocative IMO. It's further proof that too many times in the 1990s' did the Academy go with the safe choices rather than the ones that truly deserved to win.

Another example: Shakespeare In Love over Saving Private Ryan.
 
JLBats said:
Oh, right, duh, drunk here. Annie Hall never should have beat Star Wars, Rock never should have beat Taxi Driver.

Than it becomes faultless:up:

Well, yeah, I agree with you. That's nothing to take away from the credibility of Rocky or Annie Hall, both excellent films in their own right, just not as groundbreaking or thought provoking as Taxi Driver and Star Wars.
 
ANTHONYNASTI said:
Also, in 1991, JFK should've won over Silence. Not that Silence isn't a great film, but JFK was much more relevant and provocative IMO. It's further proof that too many times in the 1990s' did the Academy go with the safe choices rather than the ones that truly deserved to win.

Another example: Shakespeare In Love over Saving Private Ryan.
GOD! that is a joke right?
Saving Private Ryan came out the same year a Shakespeare in Love?
What's SPR about?
Heroes who try to save a young man from dying and sparing his mother immense amounts of grief, and takes place in the most important War we have probably fought.
What's SIL about?
A fake story about a women trying to act during a period when women weren't allowed on stage. I thought Shakespeare was married during the time this film was set. I guess I was wrong, and so were all the History books and the little bios in the his books are wrong as well.
 
SpeedballLives said:
GOD! that is a joke right?
Saving Private Ryan came out the same year a Shakespeare in Love?
What's SPR about?
Heroes who try to save a young man from dying and sparing his mother immense amounts of grief, and takes place in the most important War we have probably fought.
What's SIL about?
A fake story about a women trying to act during a period when women weren't allowed on stage. I thought Shakespeare was married during the time this film was set. I guess I was wrong, and so were all the History books and the little bios in the his books are wrong as well.

We watched Shakespeare In Love once in school. I remember being completely bored by it.
 
ANTHONYNASTI said:
We watched Shakespeare In Love once in school. I remember being completely bored by it.
It's the most historically inaccurate film ever i think.
He married Anne Hathaway in 1582. The film takes place in the 1890's.
there is no Anne Hathaway listed in the film on IMDB.
 
ANTHONYNASTI said:
We watched Shakespeare In Love once in school. I remember being completely bored by it.

That's because the subject matter was completely uninteresting and unremarkable in every way.
 
SpeedballLives said:
It's the most historically inaccurate film ever i think.
He married Anne Hathaway in 1582. The film takes place in the 1890's.
there is no Anne Hathaway listed in the film on IMDB.

Well, I wouldn't know that becaue I'm not a huge Shakespeare fan. Forget the biographical aspect, even as film in general it completely sucked.

JLBats said:
That's because the subject matter was completely uninteresting and unremarkable in every way.

You speak my language. :up:
 
ANTHONYNASTI said:
The 1970s', which were the best decade for cinema in general.

The 1990s' were flawed as heck. Goodfellas should've won for 1990 and Pulp Fiction or Shawshank should've got the gold for '94.

I agree with the Goodfellas and Pulp Fiction parts of this. Goodfellas is a classic.
 
The 60's and 70's are home to a lot of classics. The 80's were pretty good, but not as good as the past ones. The 90's sucked because so many good movies were snubbed. Shakespeare in Love over Private Ryan? Titanic? The 2000's aren't much better.
 
Kevin Roegele said:
VERY good question. :up:

2000s aren't quite as solid, Beautiful Mind? Chicago? Crash?

1990's are great.

1980's are great.

1970's are faultless.

1960's are all classics.

So I can't tell you the best, but the worst is the 2000s. So far.

2000s best pictures were great, what the hell are you talking about!?, have you ever seen a beautiful mind, Lord of the rings, a million dollar baby, Gladiator and Crash...chicago on the other hand..lol... well thoase are all great movies...meaning 2000 best winners was a great decade
 
Super Flight said:
2000s best pictures were great, what the hell are you talking about!?, have you ever seen a beautiful mind, Lord of the rings, a million dollar baby, Gladiator and Crash...chicago on the other hand..lol... well thoase are all great movies...meaning 2000 best winners was a great decade
Some of those didn't get it for the right reasons.
 
Spidey-Bat said:
Some of those didn't get it for the right reasons.

what do you mean? those WERE the best pictures in 2000-2006... :confused:
 
Kevin Roegele said:
Yeah, and a lot of people say Se7en should have won in 1996.
If by "a lot of people" you mean internet geek fanboys, yes. However, this is not an opinion of people in the film industry or the general movie going public as the Pulp Fiction opinion.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
200,563
Messages
21,761,849
Members
45,597
Latest member
iamjonahlobe
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"