Knight Rise
Sidekick
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2010
- Messages
- 2,063
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
In the end, both voice and physical, which set of actors really gave you a good Batman and Joker combination?
Christian Bale and Heath Ledger. They had the most interesting Batman/Joker relationship. Neither will kill the other, Batman because he doesn't want to give Joker the satisfaction, and Joker because Batman is too fun for him to deal with, ripped straight from The Killing Joke. Not to mention that Ledger's Joker wanted Batman to execute him because it would corrupt him.
Well, that was in Batman: Arkham Asylum. He gives Batman a wide open shot to kill him, but he knows already he wouldn't do it and laughs at him. He even says "I want you to catch me, just not yet!"
Oh I'm sure he did. Arkham Asylum is linked off of the comics which also includes "The Killing Joke", in which Joker doesn't understand why Batman isn't mad like him. He wants him to do it because he gets overjoyed when he sees Batman tempted to do it. So he just pushes it further and further hoping one day he'll snap
Bale and Ledger and Conroy and Hamill.
Nicholson and Keaton only shared one scene together as Batman and Joker and it was Batman being all angry at him for killing his parents. That's not the nature of their relationship at all.
Ok. Heath Ledger's Joker was still more terrifying than Mark Hamill's Joker was. Plus, Ledger's Joker did more damage to Bale's Batman in The Dark Knight than Hamill's Joker did to Conroy's Batman in Batman: The Animated Series, The New Batman Adventures, Justice League, Justice League Unlimited TV series (and other affiliated media), and the Batman: Arkham Asylum video game. Only in Batman Beyond: Return of the Joker did he do comparable damage to Batman, and that was in flashback, and he died shortly afterward.
In YOUR opinion. I personally would feel more terrified being attacked by Hamills Joker especially after Batman Beyond when he's choking Terry and telling him to laugh it up. Just gives me more of a chill than Heaths. It's also your opinion to say Ledger did more damage to Batman when that's completely incomparable since they are 2 different things. So you stick with what you think, I'll stick with mine. Kapeesh?
Ledger and Bale. Nailed it.
You took one performance out of the many Hamill has done? Wow just.....wow
Tough to say. Out of the big three, I'd say Keaton and Nicholson are the weakest. Not a whole lot of interaction and it becomes a revenge story towards the end. Conroy and Hamill have a much larger history together as their characters; pretty much from point A to Z. Bale and Ledger had the best material out of all to work with.
For me, Bale is Batman and Ledger is the Joker. Their story feels more personal and at the same time, Batman doesn't lose focus that he is first and foremost a crime fighter, not a man with a vendetta. Bale and Ledger get the vote.
You took one performance out of the many Hamill has done? Wow just.....wow
What is your problem? Are you so insecure about anyone preferring anything better than BTAS?
Some people think Daniel Craig is a better Bond than all the others who's done more performances than him. If that's what they like best then fair play to them. There's probably going to be people who are going to like Andrew Garfield as Spider-Man more than Tobey's three performances in the movies. Again so what if they do?
Quality is subjective. Godzilla2014, take no notice of him.
No he's just using bad examples. Chill the hell out
Bale/Ledger and Conroy/Hamill are tied for me. Conroy and Hamill just have such a long run together and there's just so many wonderful moments in their time together that is just not comparable to anything else, times that show these two know each other like nobody else. Bale and Ledger though are just two titans and Gotham is their playground. Ledger waits until the mobs controlling the city are desperate enough to give the power to him and then he throws it back in their faces like a pie, now that's a joke. Bale however doesn't even take revenge after Rachel dies and Harvey is maimed, he takes the high road and continues to thwart the Joker. You can really tell that they are "destined to do this forever" as opposite sides of the same coin.
First off, the whole point of the thread is based on opinions. Second, Ledger's Joker has already killed Rachel Dawes (and several other officials), corrupted Harvey Dent, set in motion a course of events that have cost Harvey Dent his life and Batman his reputation, and he's alive, so that may not be the end of it. Hamill's Joker tortured Tim Drake into giving up Batman's secrets, brainwashed him into being his sidekick, and then got killed by the little Joker Jr. That was most of the damage Hamill's Joker ever did to Conroy's Batman over a course of about 19 or 20 years at this point, while Ledger's Joker did all the aforementioned damage to Bale's Batman in a single film. Quite frankly, when Hamill's Joker dares Conroy's Batman to kill him in Arkham Asylum, there's not very much he has done to deserve it any more than other Batman villains. When Ledger's Joker dared Batman to kill him in The Dark Knight, a part of me really understood why he just might do it, why Bale's Batman might make an exception for him. I can't say that for Hamill's Joker in most of his appearances.
People are seriously voting for Bale/Ledger? They barely had any chemistry/screen time together.