Who Said It?: Coulter vs. Hitler

[Holly Goodhead]

I remember I got banned for posting a pic of Regan from the Exorcist *********ing with a crucifix. I dont see what the problem is.

 

[jaguarr]

Post it again, Ladytron.

jag

 

[C.F. Kane]

I suppose that you could do the same kind of thing with Stalin and, George Soros for example.

Not that I'm defending Coulter. Any ideology taken to the extreme makes fools and venom-spewers

 

[bored]

I suppose that you could do the same kind of thing with Stalin and, George Soros for example.

Not that I'm defending Coulter. Any ideology taken to the extreme makes fools and venom-spewers

There's a big difference between a politically oriented rich guy and a hateful zombie with a she-***** for Dick Cheney.

 

[cass]

There's a big difference between a politically oriented rich guy and a hateful zombie with a she-***** for Dick Cheney.

Such as??????

 

[BlackSymbiote]

Such as??????

I guess one has a lot of money, the other is the living dead, I suppose?

 

[sinewave]

There's a big difference between a politically oriented rich guy and a hateful zombie with a she-***** for Dick Cheney.

please don't drag zombies into this. they wouldn't go anywhere near her putrid flesh.

 

[Corinthian™]

please don't drag zombies into this. they wouldn't go anywhere near her putrid flesh.

they would so BONE her

 

[bored]

Such as??????

Soros supports causes he believes in financially, Coulter says crazy, pointless **** to piss people off.

 

[Danger Mouse]

Huh? Who said they were put on equal ground? Only thing Coulter murders is my faith in humanity. The point of the quiz is just another way of showing what a nut she is (by highlighting how she and Adolph Hitler made similar-sounding comments regarding liberals).

She's as nutty as Adolf Hitler (though, admittedly, not as murderous) for making similar comments?

 

[bored]

*groans* NOBODY IS PUTTING HER ON AN EQUAL LEVEL WITH ADOLPH HITLER. The point is to put the vile she spits in perspective.

 

[sinewave]

Here's nice little clip from Countdown with Keith Olberman claiming that Ann Coulter is guilty of plagarism in her latest book, "Godless". Check it out.

 

[cass]

Here's nice little clip from Countdown with Keith Olberman claiming that Ann Coulter is guilty of plagarism in her latest book, "Godless". Check it out.

Wow, an "expert" with no credentials in the field considering his degree is biophysics. And of course because it fits Olbermann's agenda he runs with it. Sounds a bit like Rathergate to me.

 

[Darthphere]

Hey, so how did that press conference Rick Santorum put together go?,........

 

[sinewave]

Wow, an "expert" with no credentials in the field considering his degree is biophysics. And of course because it fits Olbermann's agenda he runs with it. Sounds a bit like Rathergate to me.

ha! i notice little miss adam's apple hasn't refuted the charge. by the way, you don't consider someone who's developed software designed to detect plagarism an expert in the field? why would the new york post, who's owned by rupert murdoch, hire a firm that isn't credible in the field to investigate it? i'm sure you wouldn't have a problem with this guy if he claimed al franken was a plagarist based on solid proof, would you? your partisanship knows no bounds.

 

[sinewave]

Hey, so how did that press conference Rick Santorum put together go?,........

you mean the one where he tried to claim iraq-iran war-era weapons were just found and still functional, as proof that iraq was indeed a direct threat to the united states? pretty well, i'd say.

 

[Darthphere]

you mean the one where he tried to claim iraq-iran war-era weapons were just found and still functional, as proof that iraq was indeed a direct threat to the united states? pretty well, i'd say.

Yeah that one, he even showed us classified documents to prove that he was right. What a great guy.

 

[cass]

ha! i notice little miss adam's apple hasn't refuted the charge. by the way, you don't consider someone who's developed software designed to detect plagarism an expert in the field? why would the new york post, who's owned by rupert murdoch, hire a firm that isn't credible in the field to investigate it? i'm sure you wouldn't have a problem with this guy if he claimed al franken was a plagarist based on solid proof, would you? your partisanship knows no bounds.

I don't give a damn about Al Franken. And when there's no legitimate charges, why should you even dispute them?

Olbermann's partisanship knows no bounds. Funny how all he ever has on his show are Democrat strategists, the guy from the Village Voice, and journalists from whatever paper publishes top secret gov't operations.

Olbermann's obsession with O'Reilly and Coulter is all too telling of just how jealous he is that: 1) he doesn't have O'Reilly's ratings and 2) he can't sell books like Coulter or Anderson Cooper for that matter.

He's a hack.

 

[bored]

I don't give a damn about Al Franken. And when there's no legitimate charges, why should you even dispute them?

Olbermann's partisanship knows no bounds. Funny how all he ever has on his show are Democrat strategists, the guy from the Village Voice, and journalists from whatever paper publishes top secret gov't operations.

Olbermann's obsession with O'Reilly and Coulter is all too telling of just how jealous he is that: 1) he doesn't have O'Reilly's ratings and 2) he can't sell books like Coulter or Anderson Cooper for that matter.

He's a hack.

Of course you don't give a damn about Al Franken, because it doesn't suit your purposes to right now. And do you know why Olbermann isn't as succesful as Coulter and O'Reilly? Because less liberals care about ranting hacks like that.

 

[sinewave]

I don't give a damn about Al Franken. And when there's no legitimate charges, why should you even dispute them?

Olbermann's partisanship knows no bounds. Funny how all he ever has on his show are Democrat strategists, the guy from the Village Voice, and journalists from whatever paper publishes top secret gov't operations.

Olbermann's obsession with O'Reilly and Coulter is all too telling of just how jealous he is that: 1) he doesn't have O'Reilly's ratings and 2) he can't sell books like Coulter or Anderson Cooper for that matter.

He's a hack.

olberman aside, coulter is a proven plagiarist. o'reilly doesn't even have o'reilly's ratings anymore. he claims they're always increasing while they're actually decreasing.