Depends on how long it takes for them to fix Obi-Wan's script issues.Deborah Chow would be a great choice, but she might be busy with Obi-Wan.
The Russos Bros didn't use CM because EG wasn't going to really be about her; it was going to be mainly about the original 6 Avengers and a handful of secondary characters to fill out the Time Heist teams.
Okay?No, the Russos didn't use CM because they didn't want to do the hard work they displayed with their previous films and just decided not to. Maybe not put her on the poster as a member of the team then? As I already stated in another thread, the film didn't need to be about her in order for her inclusion. I feel like this is just a lazy excuse to handwave poor writing and character development. She barely had any lines. She barely spoke to anyone. If you weren't going to integrate her into the plot in a more meaningful way then maybe don't set her up in your previous movie, only to pretend she doesn't exist for most of the next film. No one ever said the movie needed to be about her. The movie wasn't about Rocket, Nebula or War Machine either. They still had interactions and parts in the plot. In Civil War, the movie wasn't about Scarlet Witch or Spider-Man,they were still integrated into the plot as well. It's either a film that includes ALL of it's characters or just the original 6. You can't have it both ways.
How about instead of doing some dumb **** like killing off the villain you setup for 11 years in the first 10 minutes of the movie, you keep him alive, have him escape to give the movie some stakes. This could've setup a mission with Captain Marvel, Thor and other Avengers to go look for him etc. Or maybe leave Thor behind and let her be on the Time Heist since apparently Thor was only good for getting drunk and crying in this movie. I don't think they even needed a Time Heist team anyway since they could've just sent Cap to get them all on his own.
Captain Marvel in Endgame was wasted and horribly written. Instead of giving Captain Marvel a character, she was nothing more than a deus ex machina.
Get Kathryn Bigelow.
I dunno, you think? She's a great director, but I don't know if she's so above a Marvel feature. Hurt Locker was a long time ago
No, the Russos didn't use CM because they didn't want to do the hard work they displayed with their previous films and just decided not to. Maybe not put her on the poster as a member of the team then? As I already stated in another thread, the film didn't need to be about her in order for her inclusion. I feel like this is just a lazy excuse to handwave poor writing and character development. She barely had any lines. She barely spoke to anyone. If you weren't going to integrate her into the plot in a more meaningful way then maybe don't set her up in your previous movie, only to pretend she doesn't exist for most of the next film. No one ever said the movie needed to be about her. The movie wasn't about Rocket, Nebula or War Machine either. They still had interactions and parts in the plot. In Civil War, the movie wasn't about Scarlet Witch or Spider-Man,they were still integrated into the plot as well. It's either a film that includes ALL of it's characters or just the original 6. You can't have it both ways.
How about instead of doing some dumb **** like killing off the villain you setup for 11 years in the first 10 minutes of the movie, you keep him alive, have him escape to give the movie some stakes. This could've setup a mission with Captain Marvel, Thor and other Avengers to go look for him etc. Or maybe leave Thor behind and let her be on the Time Heist since apparently Thor was only good for getting drunk and crying in this movie. I don't think they even needed a Time Heist team anyway since they could've just sent Cap to get them all on his own.
Captain Marvel in Endgame was wasted and horribly written. Instead of giving Captain Marvel a character, she was nothing more than a deus ex machina.