Why three dimensions?

Corinthian™ said:
Because we don't know what the other 7 dimensions are exactly. We just *think* we know that they are there...
then how exactly was the number 11 reached if we arent really sure what those other 7 dimensions are. see if it were up to me i would have at least picked a number like 42, try and have a sense of humor to it or something :o
 
Tanalist said:
it's slow methodical and always the same, just like you. sounds boring to me.

So, you ignored my "on-topic" assertion and chose instead to be a champion of ignorance.

O-kay.:confused:
 
Wilhelm-Scream said:
Seriously, it's so helpful (most of the time).
" "I" before "E" except after "C".

:(
Except for words that rhyme with neighbor and weigh.
Although that still doesn't explain seizure.

Corinthian™ said:
Manic said:
Why 11? Can't we just increase the output of the 10th dimension?
Because we don't know what the other 7 dimensions are exactly. We just *think* we know that they are there...
My Spinal Tap references are wasted here.
 
you never responded to post 43 on topic. since then i've just been playing games with you. based on what ever old tactic you're going to bring up again. i'm ignorant of spelling at times. big deal. your concentrating on details insignificant to the flow of the conversation continues unabated. well done.
 
AlteredEgo said:
then how exactly was the number 11 reached if we arent really sure what those other 7 dimensions are. see if it were up to me i would have at least picked a number like 42, try and have a sense of humor to it or something :o
How about 47?

In a row? :eek:






And How we came up with that number?


Gods, read aa book of string theory because I don't know either, but I know we think we know. I think
 
Danalys said:
heh ironic. ever seen a truely 2d object in 3d space wilhelm?
No. Impossible.
Danalys said:
everything in the universe exists in all the dimentions of the universe. we only percieve 4 of them as was said before. close one eye and keep your head still and you'll see this world in 2d. doesn't change the world tho just the perception of it.
Again, I agree, only I take the time to spell correctly.

I guess if you're right, and I agree with you, I'm one up on you.:)
 
Danalys said:
heh ironic. ever seen a truely 2d object in 3d space wilhelm? no, because you can't. everything in the universe exists in all the dimentions of the universe. we only percieve 4 of them as was said before. close one eye and keep your head still and you'll see this world in 2d. doesn't change the world tho just the perception of it.

Wilhelm-Scream said:
I KNOW! That's what I'm SAYING!


Looks like you have an irrational desire to find fault with me where there is none.
At least, when I find fault with you, it exISTS.:up:
 
i didn't believe you when you said that was what you were saying. since anyone who ment anything close to what i ment wouldn't have butchered the meaning so much that it ending up reading as something completely different.

two options you either didn't mean that at all; and now think saying you did will convince some people making you look oh so flawless.

or you actually did have a good idea but failed in the execution of conveying it. then couldn't possibly admit your flaws so you shift the argument to spelling instead.

i don't purposfully find faults. they are just easily aparent. that's perception for you. how spelling mistakes jump out at you, the incorrect meaning of your post (as presented) jumped out at me.
 
i so need to take over the world so i can fix the language in such a way that i can then spell everything correctly. taking over the world is difficult tho :( you know i ment meant :)
 
In my ideal world, I would spell things differently than the girl downstairs would.
That's why we have to have a standard.

It's an interface, and a diplomatic gesture.

If you go to Japan, and meet with dudes, and don't bow, they'll be put off to the degree that they won't see through to your real intent.

It's just a fact in this 4-Dimensional world.:up:
 
Corinthian™ said:
If we could move faster then the speed of light in the oposite direction of the speed of light we could travel back in time :cool:

Or we could just drive a delorean at 88 mph :p
 
i'd like some system of variable spelling actually. each different spelling would contain a core componant which would differenciate it from other words. but there would be room for change sort of like hello hallo hullo all mean the same thing. it would possibly be structed to allow easier rhyming and puns aswell.
 
DV8 said:
well . . . I think Einstein believed that time was the fourth dimension . . . and if you take a hit of acid, you'll see at least 6 dimensions . . . but be warned!!!

Einstein was right, time is the fourth dimension. Though the 3 dimension define space, so there are actually a number of dimensions that define time. However, humanity only has access to one of the time dimensions... travelling forward. Once we can pass the speed of light we will have access to a second time dimension, backward. And if the theory of wormholes is correct and we ever manage to solve the problems of travelling through them we may get access to the 3rd time dimension... but I wouldn't hold my breath waiting to get access to the 2nd & 3rd time dimensions.
 
i've been thinking that you could consider energy and gravity as other dimentions of time.
 
Not too long ago my brother showed me an article that could possibly be a basis for time travel. Basically some guys were making an experience were they were shooting beams of light trough optic fiber. The thing is, the light got so fast that it reflected back before reaching the other end of the fiber. Really weird.
 
^ i've heard of that, but you can alter time depending on how you fly around masses in space too. Some guy came back on a shuttle 3 seconds younger than other people on earth born at the same moment.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory#Extra_dimensions

A standard analogy for this is to consider multidimensional space as a garden hose. If the hose is viewed from a sufficient distance, it appears to have only one dimension, its length. Indeed, think of a ball small enough to enter the hose but not too small. Throwing such a ball inside the hose, the ball would move more or less in one dimension; in any experiment we make by throwing such balls in the hose, the only important movement will be one-dimensional, that is, along the hose. However, as one approaches the hose, one discovers that it contains a second dimension, its circumference. Thus, an ant crawling inside it would move in two dimensions (and a fly flying in it would move in three dimensions). This "extra dimension" is only visible within a relatively close range to the hose, or if one "throws in" small enough objects. Similarly, the extra compact dimensions are only visible at extremely small distances, or by experimenting with particles with extremely small wave lengths (of the order of the compact dimension's radius), which in quantum mechanics means very high energies (see wave-particle duality).

Another possibility is that we are stuck in a 3+1 dimensional (i.e. three spatial dimensions plus the time dimension) subspace of the full universe. This subspace is supposed to be a D-brane, hence this is known as a braneworld theory.
 
8Ball/JanG5 said:
Another possibility is that we are stuck in a 3+1 dimensional (i.e. three spatial dimensions plus the time dimension) subspace of the full universe. This subspace is supposed to be a D-brane, hence this is known as a braneworld theory.
If we get into branes that makes everything much more complicated.

Manic said:
Why 11? Can't we just increase the output of the 10th dimension?
...but this universe goes to 11? :confused:
 
Sentinel X said:
I really dont see how time is a dimension...Ill have to do research.


but if someone can explain (since Im lazy) please do so

If time was not a dimension, then you would have a serious issue with everything you would do in life...Let's say you are standing on a street corner...If time wasn't a dimension, then every person that EVER stood on that same exact spot would still be standing in that same exact spot as well as everywhere else they have ever moved to within the 3 axis you choose to acknowledge. You would be destroyed, as would they, since two objects cannot occupy the same space simultaniously. One could argue that the Earth is moving, so you could stand on that same street corner...but seeing as you are moving with the Earth, as is the corner, time HAS to be a dimension that you are moving through. You ARE standing there NOW...they WERE standing there THEN. Time is very much a dimension that we all move through.
 
Leto Atrides said:
...but this universe goes to 11? :confused:
Npw that's how you reply to a statement like that.
 
The real reason that there is 3 is because if there was only 2 we would all be very very flat
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
202,289
Messages
22,080,692
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"