yeah, lizard was just a big dud of a character.
- connor's struggle as an amputee was never shown. he seemed to function proudly, and competently, without it. he didn't cut his clothes like amputees so often do. we probably would have cared more about his character if we saw how hard his life was without an arm. this could have been very easily achieved.
- no family. lack of sympathy/empathy as a result. how did his work impact his family life? how did his missing arm impact his family?
- lizard transformation was inconsistently shown and there was no explicit statement by the filmmakers that he was getting progressively more mindless. once he was the lizard, he switched back and forth between a creature of rage and an intelligent man who just happened to physically be a lizard
- so was the lizard still connors? or did it corrupt him? we never got a clear answer. the lizard spoke as connors numerous times, and connors spoke like the lizard when still in human form. it's like, huh? is connors good or not? he clearly devised the plan to turn the world into lizards etc while he was human, so his transformation is lacking as a result. there's very little dr. jekyll and mr. hyde about it in the end, which is so ironic given how often it was cited as inspiration....
- lizard's plan was stupid. the gas would have worn off eventually, and everyone would have returned to being human. movie could have established that he had made the transformation permanent, but it did not.
- connors turns back into a human at the end and suddenly is good again. he laments the captain's demise, save's peter (even though peter can stick to walls???) and is generally shown to be normal and good. yet, this contradicts how he was still malevolent as a human earlier in the film, and it also ignores how the lizard's motivations to cure all amputees mirrored his own.
lizard/connors was all over the place.