Agreed with everything in this post
Thanks.
I can understand people wanting Angle back in WWE but I just don't get how some people can ignore long term what more people going out and trying to help more companies means to the business and WWE.
If there were no other companies in the 70's and the 80's we wouldn't be sitting here talking about WWE and all those great matches we loved in the 80's, 90s, and early 2000's in WWE never would have happened.
Vince has a HANDFUL of success stories of grooming talent from the ground up himself. The Rock, Kurt Angle, Brock Lesnar, and arguably John Cena. I can think of very few others on that level. Angle is one of those guys that has a natural aptitude in athletics and I'd give the Rocks UPBRINGING and family just as much credit as I'd give Vince for his talent.
Every other star learned some of their fundamentals outside of WWE. Hogan, Foley, Austin, Savage, Rude, Taker, Michaels, Hart, Guerrero, Mysterio, Benoit, Jericho, even Triple H. I'd even argue Edge and Christian learned a lot outside of WWE working in Canada and overseas. I could go on and on. Point is most off these guys had some invaluable experience in OTHER companies working with other veterans. Learning away from the WWE style probably helped them immensely when it came time to play to different crowds with different tastes and how to improvise.
WWE has had more successful stars that worked in WWE and other companies than stars that have worked solely in WWE. There's a reason for that.
WWE has better athletes than they did 20 years ago but not better workers and it shows. Bryan and Punk are two of the best workers in WWE and two of the legitimately good talents and they also had a broad range of experience outside of WWE. Thats why they are so good.
Just like I said with Kong...she's popular right now because she is UNIQUE. And she became what she is outside of WWE. If it were up to WWE to build a unique diva up from nothing they wouldn't do it today. She had to get herself noticed by people like Austin and Ross outside of WWE and she did a lot of that in TNA. Vince has ALWAYS been good at seeing another companies talent and how good they are and then bringing them into WWE teaching talent from scratch.
Vince McMahon takes great talents and makes them stars. He usually doesn't make great talents.
Kurt Angle is a bigger draw than Jeff Hardy was/will ever be. So that isn't the best comparison.
Its not so cut and dry as that. In WWE Hardy is a bigger Draw than Angle. But Angle had years to show what he was worth in WWE's main event while Hardy had JUST reached the cusp of what he could be when he left.
Hardy has that intangible megastar aura that Angle just doesn't have. Angle is by far more talented but what I'm talking about goes beyond pure mechanical ring talent. Hardy has more of that it factor. Put Hardy in a proper Wrestelmania main even scenario with the same support system Angle had and he'd probably outdraw any Mania main event Angle was ever involved in.
Its the same way a lot of guys where better wrestlers than Hogan but Hogan had that magic and that charisma in his prime.
In TNA Hardy has more POTENTIAL to be a bigger draw but so far Angle has simply proved to be more valuable to that company as a whole than Hardy has partly because they used Angle better and partly because Angle was there longer and more reliable than Hardy.