Wrestling

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Face it Vile you want to be a smark but that involves being unbiased and you can't do that"

Whoa...lmao. But honestly....smarks are pretty much biased. Like McMahon dotes on Big Men, Smarks dote on technical wrestlers, regardless if they actually have charisma or not
 
hunter rider said:
You mean unlike the completely meaningless 4 way at AAO or the endless 4CS on ROH shows ?

Nope. At Against All Odds, it elevated Jay Lethal and gave him his first win in TNA. From that he got a spot on the TNA X cup team. It was the true start of his TNA run.

4 Corner Survivals in ROH are usually a lot of fun and they are great at advancing storylines. Plus, the 4 Corner Survival matches go a lot longer and aren't just pointless schmozzes, they have pscyhology and storytelling aspects integrated into them.

The 4CS match at Final Battle wasn't just all about throwing 4 guys into a match. It was about Joe vs. Daniels, Joe vs. Lethal, and Whitmer vs. Daniels. They worked 3 different feuds into one match.

You mean like Styles Daniels and Joe fighting each other Yet again ?

For the third time in less than a year, :p .

Plus, if ever given the choice of Angle/Taker and Joe/Daniels/AJ I will ALWAYS pick the latter.

Has no bearing on the quality of the match

I bet you the match is nothing truly special.

The last 2 matches of that series between Benoit and Orton were better than any of those WCW 7 serie's matches and Booker and Benoit have PPV time tonight.

WWE wishes as such. Oh and you mean the matches that ended in DQ and screwy finishes that led to Booker T winning the belt without doing jack? What a joke. That Orton had to sub for Booker T was just symbolic of how pathetic their Best of 7 was. When Booker T and Benoit's best of 7 match, only once ended in DQ, they had a rematch to make up for it.


No MNM are the best,just cos strong and Aries smack the **** out of opponents and do some head drops doesn't make them the best,MNM draw heat and make their opponents look good,they are perfect heels
as for the match,well it couldn't be any worse than the AAO tag title match

Seeing MNM, then most of GenNext matches along with Aries and Strong...you are way off the mark. Aries and Strong do a lot more than just chops and head drops.

The 6 man at the Rumble was better than all the recent XD "throw in every spot you have" matches have been
Face it Vile you want to be a smark but that involves being unbiased and you can't do that

There's more to them than just throw in every spot you have. They actually WRESTLE and do the spots in the matches as well.
 
TheVileOne said:
Nope. At Against All Odds, it elevated Jay Lethal and gave him his first win in TNA. From that he got a spot on the TNA X cup team. It was the true start of his TNA run.

4 Corner Survivals in ROH are usually a lot of fun and they are great at advancing storylines. Plus, the 4 Corner Survival matches go a lot longer and aren't just pointless schmozzes, they have pscyhology and storytelling aspects integrated into them.

The 4CS match at Final Battle wasn't just all about throwing 4 guys into a match. It was about Joe vs. Daniels, Joe vs. Lethal, and Whitmer vs. Daniels. They worked 3 different feuds into one match.



For the third time in less than a year, :p .

Plus, if ever given the choice of Angle/Taker and Joe/Daniels/AJ I will ALWAYS pick the latter.



I bet you the match is nothing truly special.



WWE wishes as such. Oh and you mean the matches that ended in DQ and screwy finishes that led to Booker T winning the belt without doing jack? What a joke. That Orton had to sub for Booker T was just symbolic of how pathetic their Best of 7 was. When Booker T and Benoit's best of 7 match, only once ended in DQ, they had a rematch to make up for it.




Seeing MNM, then most of GenNext matches along with Aries and Strong...you are way off the mark. Aries and Strong do a lot more than just chops and head drops.



There's more to them than just throw in every spot you have. They actually WRESTLE and do the spots in the matches as well.

Vile i would bother going point for point but i was correct the first time
really you shoiuld have no point to make here as if all your posts of "WWE is crap and sucks" are true then you shouldn't have seen any matches of most of the guys you are critiquing
 
TheVileOne said:
I've watched enough :p . Probably a lot more than you have rider.

That makes no sense since i watch RAW and SD every week and watch all the PPV's and you claim to hate it
 
for the first time in a while, i'm not gonna see a wwe ppv... and i actually don't care. in fact, i'm kinda wishing i hadn't missed tna last night.
 
im getting a WWE ppv for the first tiime in a while also, because I actually like SD! I said it I watch Raw & it has its moments but i enjoy SD! Now. even the goofy gimmicks & Pirate Paul is the ****
 
I've been wondering, what did the Heartthrobs do on Byte This that led to their release? Apparently, they've even cancelled the segment as well now. It must've been something pretty ****ed up.....
 
I thought they were released because...y'know...they were kinda useless. :o
 
No, apparently they said or did soemthing on Byte This that was so bad that they didn't even air the segment. They were released just a couple days after that incident.

But so far, I haven't heard anything about what they did specifically :confused:
 
Eric Draven said:
No, apparently they said or did soemthing on Byte This that was so bad that they didn't even air the segment. They were released just a couple days after that incident.

But so far, I haven't heard anything about what they did specifically :confused:
Well, I guess it's for the best anyway. But I would like to know what they said.
 
hunter rider said:
That makes no sense since i watch RAW and SD every week and watch all the PPV's and you claim to hate it

I was doing all of that before you were :p .

Though I'm not doing it anymore.
 
He didn't come back because he's still rehabbing. I doubt he will be back until after Wrestlemania. I imagine he will feud with Angle.
 
Pretty good is not fitting for a 35 dollar show.

http://www.pwtorch.com/artman/publish/article_16140.shtml

The Torch rated the tag title match *1/2. To me its pretty sad that the WWE doesn't even have a legitimate tag team to give the titles to and instead another lame mismatched tag team in Hardy and Tatanka. I feel bad for Hardy being saddled with that guy when he should be a singles contender.
 
TheVileOne said:
Pretty good is not fitting for a 35 dollar show.

http://www.pwtorch.com/artman/publish/article_16140.shtml

The Torch rated the tag title match *1/2. To me its pretty sad that the WWE doesn't even have a legitimate tag team to give the titles to and instead another lame mismatched tag team in Hardy and Tatanka. I feel bad for Hardy being saddled with that guy when he should be a singles contender.
Yeah....I think we get it now. :o
Also, the tag match was non title.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"