X3 Box Office Tracker

Jan Irisi said:
No, kurosawa does not want a Wolverine movie, because he blames Wolverine for everything from global warming to the common cold. He hates Wolverine, and Wolverine fans, so........
Wolverine killed my Aunt :(
 
mr jinx said:
i dont understand your reasoning. not to be rude, but you were wrong last year, as F4 DID make more than $140 million. so by "deja vu" are you saying we should discount you again this year?


Ummm...I was right on the money last year, as I was last week...... FF only limped to 154M domestic.....and X3 is dropping 65-70% as I predicted last week as well. So yes perhaps you should listen to me when I say that the first Saturday is the only day to look at for legs on a movie. This is the reason X4 was not greenlit as well. This movie cost 210M to make....that number looks about what it will make back domestically. I just saw the movie again and the theatre had 20 people in it....not a good sign.
 
FOR GODE SAKE X3 COSTED $165 million to make NOT $210 million. If u believe in boxofficemojo.com then you know what when Superman returns budget is posted on that site and if it doesn't make enough money i will make fun of that movie.
 
I dont know why some people keep saying the movie is doing terrible. The movie has over 150 million and it has been open for just over a week, thats more than some movies will ever make period.
-Another thing, I love how they are saying The Breakup is doing so well when I'm guessing that movie might not even hit anywhere near the 100 million mark.
 
Jan Irisi said:
That bastard!! :mad:
I know. He shall pay.

*puts Daredevil mask on*
LoGaN's RuNNer said:
I dont know why some people keep saying the movie is doing terrible. The movie has over 150 million and it has been open for just over a week, thats more than some movies make period.
lol, I know
 
Aiden said:
No, it´s only the production budget. Studios aren´t letting out the marketing costs these days.

Well, Mr Rothman, looks like your punishment has arrived... This is no ordinary drop, it´s a Hulk-like one... Your movie had a huge potential at the BO, could have been a true smash... But because you hurried it and made it choppy and unfinished, it failed to live to that potential and the audience has realized and you burned out what could have been a gold mine for years to come. If I were a Fox stockholder, I´d demand your resignation.

And I couldn´t care less if Singer was a little more or less faithful than Ratner... He made better movies, period.
 
danoyse said:
He stole my puppy. :(

He peed in my neighbor's flower garden. :(

(her roses are doing wonderful, but that's beside the point)
 
Jan Irisi said:
He peed in my neighbor's flower garden. :(

(her roses are doing wonderful, but that's beside the point)

LOL!

I guess that means he's the one whole took all the beer out of my fridge. :(
 
ultimatefan said:
No, it´s only the production budget. Studios aren´t letting out the marketing costs these days.

Well, Mr Rothman, looks like your punishment has arrived... This is no ordinary drop, it´s a Hulk-like one... Your movie had a huge potential at the BO, could have been a true smash... But because you hurried it and made it choppy and unfinished, it failed to live to that potential and the audience has realized and you burned out what could have been a gold mine for years to come. If I were a Fox stockholder, I´d demand your resignation.

And I couldn´t care less if Singer was a little more or less faithful than Ratner... He made better movies, period.
The overall cost is 210

Production was 160
 
danoyse said:
LOL!

I guess that means he's the one whole took all the beer out of my fridge. :(
emm...

*runs and hide*
 
Jan Irisi said:
This has been discussed already. BOM combines the two costs together.
Not that I know of. They used to show both costs, then at some point more and more studios were not displaying the marketing costs, so much that some movies had production budget but marketing costs were listed as non-available. Now no studios report the marketing costs, so they removed the space dedicated to them. If both costs were combined, the site should specify.
 
Look back in the thread a few pages. Many different sources have been cited and each says that the 210 is the combined total.
 
Jan Irisi said:
This has been discussed already. BOM combines the two costs together.

That's not true. Look at the FF costs....and X2 costs...the Spiderman costs.

Either way, I don't think BOM is entirely accurate. And I doubt the budget was that high for X3.
 
ultimatefan said:
Well, Mr Rothman, looks like your punishment has arrived... This is no ordinary drop, it´s a Hulk-like one... Your movie had a huge potential at the BO, could have been a true smash... But because you hurried it and made it choppy and unfinished, it failed to live to that potential and the audience has realized and you burned out what could have been a gold mine for years to come. If I were a Fox stockholder, I´d demand your resignation.

Are you honestly expecting some sort of apology for all this?

From where I work (a Fox rival), no one's going to be hanging their heads in shame if the movie is #2 this weekend. They're going to be all about the big opening weekend, the subsequent grosses it makes from here on in domestically and worldwide...and eventually the DVD and TV revenue.

The percentage drop doesn't show up in the stockholder report. The final profits do, and there will be plenty to keep the stockholders happy.
 
Pickle-El said:
That's not true. Look at the FF costs....and X2 costs...the Spiderman costs.

Either way, I don't think BOM is entirely accurate. And I doubt the budget was that high for X3.


Yeah, all the other sources that were cited said 160-165 with 50 million for marketing. Total=210 million.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"