🇷🇺🇺🇦 Discussion: Relations with Russia and the war in Ukraine

, but you don't see people being arrested for not saying "special military operation".
Different societies draw their lines in different places. Here, it can be quite dangerous to be a campus protester. You might be arrested, or worse things might happen to you such as losing your home, being denied graduation or being blacklisted by employers.

.the problem is that their economic infrastructure is now as screwed up as their political structure.
That is something that you keep repeating but it's not backed by the numbers.

Russia has a smaller gini coefficient than the USA, a lower rate of infant mortality than the USA, a higher rate of literacy, a lower rate of homicide, and higher rates of economic growth (3.6% this year). They also actually have high speed rail and universal health care, a debt to gdp ratio of 19%, and they punish people for corruption.

Your descriptions consistently and correctly describe the Yeltsin years.
 
Last edited:
Yeah.......well Russia has always had a deformed political structure. If you like authoritarian regimes, you probably like what Russia is doing. With the fall of of the USSR, it also became a less effective economic system and experienced privatization (piratization LOL) of its factories. With that came the same problems you'll see with any other privatized economic system.

What they really need is an effective opposition party; something that all dictators fear and oppress. It's held them back forever (even during the time of the USSR). They got rid of a more efficient economic structure and kept the same old repressive political system. It's a shame really......Putin was right about the fall of the USSR being a shame. He just, naturally has it backwards. What was really needed after the fall of the USSR was to cast off the repressive politics that have defined the country for virtually ever.
 
Different societies draw their lines in different places. Here, it can be quite dangerous to be a campus protester. You might be arrested, or worse things might happen to you such as losing your home, being denied graduation or being blacklisted by employers.


That is something that you keep repeating but it's not backed by the numbers.

Russia has a smaller gini coefficient than the USA, a lower rate of infant mortality than the USA, a higher rate of literacy, a lower rate of homicide, and higher rates of economic growth (3.6% this year). They also actually have high speed rail and universal health care, a debt to gdp ratio of 19%, and they punish people for corruption.

Your descriptions consistently and correctly describe the Yeltsin years.

Also jail people for being gay, which as much as many here in the US want to, not quite there yet.

Just because America=bad does not mean Russia and China are good.
 
Also jail people for being gay, which as much as many here in the US want to, not quite there yet.

Just because America=bad does not mean Russia and China are good.

There are certainly shades of gray. IMO the political structures in Russia and China, for example, are more repressive than those in the US; although some in this country seem to want to make a rapid race to the bottom. I think the difference is that there is an opposition party here that will, to an extent, protect some very fundamental freedoms.

One major problem in the US is the abnormal influence of corporate money in our "democracy". If you can control the narrative, you can, generally, control the outcome. If 60% of the people in the US decided we wanted worker control of industry, supported by the tax dollars we pay, would there be a peaceful transition? I think that's something of a coin flip, but, relatively speaking, we have a pretty advanced political system with well established rules and that's important to effectuating change.

I don't see the same possibility in, the same example, Russia and China. A fundamental question that needs to be asked is "Can the populace effect meaningful change without encountering violent opposition?" I have my doubts that any ruling class will give up their privilege without violent struggle, but my thought is that if it is possible, it will be because of a political structure that holds to democratic principles. That will stress any such system.

I could go on and there are so many nuances to what I've written above, but this just isn't the forum to expound upon them.
 
Also jail people for being gay, which as much as many here in the US want to, not quite there yet.
Homosexuality isn't actually banned in Russia, but in general the USA is better on gay rights and representation. It's one of the few things that have gone well here in the past twenty years.
 
I don't see the same possibility in, the same example, Russia and China. A fundamental question that needs to be asked is "Can the populace effect meaningful change without encountering violent opposition?" I have my doubts that any ruling class will give up their privilege without violent struggle, but my thought is that if it is possible, it will be because of a political structure that holds to democratic principles. That will stress any such system.
It's exceedingly unlikely for any ruling class to ever willingly give up substantial power just to be kind or entirely due to internal peaceful opposition. It's not clear if this has ever happened.

But treating the working class well isn't just about being kind -- it's a sound investment. Russia, for example, provides 140 days of maternity leave by law, compared to 0 in the USA. Does that only happen because of democratic opposition? No, it happens because in the long term it benefits everybody in the country. They even have some maternity leave before birth, which makes sense because women need to rest at 8 months pregnant.

In the long run even US billionaires would benefit from a stronger social safety net in the USA, but there's too much ideological and intellectual pollution for them to realize it. They'd rather ask who John Galt is then have an effective labour force.

There's no current need for violent opposition there. Putin is a Russian nationalist, so he's enthusiastically investing in the long term health of Russian society, that goes beyond maternity leave. Our Congress meanwhile is full of people who are into insider trading and the revolving door.
 
Last edited:
For people who are interested in perspectives from beyond the Western corporate media blackout, here's the perspective on recent events with retired Indian Major General G.D. Bakshi. He is predicting rapid progress by the Russian forces in the next month or two.

 

Russia says Ukraine makes 62-drone attack on Russia, oil refinery halted


Ukraine destroys all 37 drones launched by Russia overnight, air force says



Zelensky wants China at Ukraine peace talks, cites ‘influence on Russia’



 
So, finally some good news out of Ukraine. .:)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,381
Messages
22,094,567
Members
45,889
Latest member
Starman68
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"