The Shape
In the shadows
- Joined
- May 30, 2006
- Messages
- 21,572
- Reaction score
- 4,473
- Points
- 103
They weren't ostriches, nor were they dodos like someone else suggested!
Jeez, if ignorance was bliss, some people would be in pure paradise.
They were prehistoric flightless birds, of which there were many species.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phorusrhacid
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gastornis
I think, regardless of the negative views, I'm going to see this movie, as it has to be seen on the big screen. I'm not expecting much more than a prehistoric fantasy epic, it's not supposed to be a documentary on the Discovery channel. I shall judge it for myself!
Does it really matter? They looked like cartoons. It doesn't matter to me whether the movie was historically accurate or not (and it was not AT ALL). What matters it that it wasn't entertaining, which is what movies are meant to be.



SERIOUSLY THOUGH I JUST GOT BACK FROM SEEING IT AND IT WAS FUN!!! I ENJOYED IT, BUT I ALSO KNEW WHAT I WAS GETTING WHEN I WENT, A FUN POPCORN MOVIE WITH SOME GREAT FX, IN THAT ASPECT THE MOVIE SHINES!!! THE PLOT IS WELL, THE PLOT, LOL!!!

