Spidey Lover 10
Sidekick
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2007
- Messages
- 1,115
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Nice!
A history of 20+ years does not equal to a plot worthy of 2 hours.
The "just" of the cartoons is about transforming robots, both good and bad, who have made earth their home.
Anything else is an extension of plot presented through each episode.
Which is why I still dont get why the plot we KNOW the movie has should be considered "paper-thin".
That doesnt seem fare to me, because I like the story this film has.
Every character has an objective in this film; the Autobots, the Decepticons, Sam, Sector 7 etc ....
Nobody watched and loved the cartoon because it had 20+ years of bible-thick plot -- it had to TAKE 20 years to create that, lol !
They CHOSE to base this movie solely on the cartoon. And then they took the cartoon origin and simplified it even more. It now boils down to "let's chase this cube thing all over the universe".
We were kids back then...do you think adults were into that stuff back then? Transformers is what it is NOW because of that 20+ years.
.... And since there is over 20 years of "story" that could be used, what exactly should have been the plot for this film ?
Hahaha no, no.
I just dont think ppl should say the plot is paper-thin cus that implies the story sucks and I like the story.
Of course im not worried about it, nor am I worried about the cgi ( !!!! ) in this film ...
I just gotta wonder, if the first reviewer thought this was a paper-thin plot, what the hell was he comparing it to ?
The Transformers cartoon or another action/fantasy/mythology film that wouldnt be fare in comparison ?
And now I understand your avatar, nosebleed.
I couldnt for the life of me understand what was happening with Prime in that pic ....
Lots of nosebleeds as a kid I assume ??