EnderWiggin
Civilian
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2013
- Messages
- 103
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 38
I know.
We've got a great, well matched game on our hands and we're stuck talking about a football.
That's the media for yall
I know.
We've got a great, well matched game on our hands and we're stuck talking about a football.
ESPN's Adam Schefter says the Colts' suspicions date back to their Nov. 16 game against New England, a 42-20 Patriots win. In that game, Indianapolis safety Mike Adams intercepted two passes and handed both balls to the Colts' equipment manager to hold as souvenirs. Both balls, Schefter's sources say, were noticeably underinflated.
Those sources said the Colts raised concerns to the league, which was aware of the issue going into this weekend's AFC title game.
The timing of everything else then falls into place. Reportedly, the Colts' Sunday suspicions were confirmed the first time they got their hands on one of Brady's balls: when D'Qwell Jackson picked him off in the second quarter. The equipment manager told coach Chuck Pagano, who told GM Ryan Grigson, who told the NFL's director of field operations, who alerted the officials working the game. At the half, they inspected the balls.
Then, on the very first play of the second half (not counting the kickoff, which would have used one of the "K-balls" kept separately from the others), officials checked out the Patriots' ball and found it unsuitable for play:
They should have waited to after the Superbowl to release this story. All the media outlets are going to have a field day with this crap and it's going to overshadow the actual game.
I know.
We've got a great, well matched game on our hands and we're stuck talking about a football.
Would the Pats have won without this? Most likely yes. But it is past that at this point. They continue to do this stuff. It was coming down pretty good during the game, so making a ball easier to catch, easier to hold onto, does matter. It matters a lot. When running backs are making crash catches down the sideline, it means something.
And while it ended with a huge difference, it is easier to run away with a big lead and young team trying to catch up.
Did you get an actual ticket for the game?As a Pats fan I was beyond pissed when I woke up to the 11 out 12 news this AM. Especially since I just booked a God **** ticket to Glendale. They didn't need to do this and it's getting way to hard to defend BB and crap like this. Un****ing real.
This is classic deflection. What others do is irrelevant. Especially when you consider most are probably not ridiculous enough to try this kind of thing during the game.I cannoy believe this s***.
We all know Aaron Rodgers alters his footballs but he receives no criticism. Brad Johnson talks about deflating footballs and nobody cares. But everyone now wants New England to be burned on the stake. Oh my god, the integrity of the game is ruined. How could Belichick dare do this? They should be kicked out of the Super Bowl. Every team does it.
This is Bountygate all over again. People demonized New Orleans when almost every team did the same s***. They were just the ones who got caught on video. The worst part of it all is that this will overshadow the Big Game.
Biased ass football fans. Some especially salty Indianapolis fans as well.
Did you get an actual ticket for the game?
Nice. I hope you have a great time.Yes I have an actual ticket for the game.
Who cares if it overshadows the game? It should. Who knows how many times they've done it before, because we all know this isn't the first time. It hurts the integrity of the game to begin with. And yes, they would've beaten the Colts anyway, but that isn't the point. Belicheat doesn't know how to stop himself from being a shady liar. What if they did it against the Ravens? We won't know, but now we have to suspect it.
Hopefully Seattle wins, otherwise it'll just get much bigger. They already have the Spygate asterisks.
Would the Pats have won without this? Most likely yes. But it is past that at this point. They continue to do this stuff. It was coming down pretty good during the game, so making a ball easier to catch, easier to hold onto, does matter. It matters a lot. When running backs are making crash catches down the sideline, it means something.
And while it ended with a huge difference, it is easier to run away with a big lead and young team trying to catch up.
"Cheating is not cheating unless it is the exact and direct cause for one team beating another"
~Every Pats Fan Right Now
Yeah I doubt every team does this and finally in 2015, 45 years after the 1970 merger, a team finally got caught. The same team/coach that previously was caught doing something against the rules and got punished once.
If this is an issue, I don't know why teams are allowed to handle their own balls at all.
Exactly.Frankly, they shouldn't... no other sport does.
I am sorry, when did this become college ball? And it is flippin' adorable when the response to cheating is, everyone else does it. So we really didn't do anything wrong.Damn Pats... doing what every team ever does! Screw them.
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/not-f...nager-everyone-cheats-deflates-184104713.html
Frankly, they shouldn't... no other sport does.
Exactly.
I am sorry, when did this become college ball? And it is flippin' adorable when the response to cheating is, everyone else does it. So we really didn't do anything wrong.
Rodgers said he inflates them more. Now whether he gets away with it, who knows. It actually does the exact opposite of making the ball easier to catch, which is what the Pats are being accused of here. Or maybe I am wrong. Rodgers also says be believes there should be a minimum number, which goes against what the Pats did.Because Rodgers admitted that he does it, and it was Manning who wanted the ability for teams to handle balls. Everything you read up on this says it's likely an unwritten rule amongst QBs and trainers.
The football is the equivalent of the puck, not the stick.The stars (Brady, Manning, Rodgers, etc.) want it. Stars get what they want when they are the marketable assets that bring in the $$$$$$$$.
I actually don't think it's a bad thing... having different hardness of balls. It's like in hockey with sticks -- some players are using new technology with flexes with get better shots, and gain advantages.
Nice. I hope you have a great time.![]()
If this is an issue, I don't know why teams are allowed to handle their own balls at all.
The stars (Brady, Manning, Rodgers, etc.) want it. Stars get what they want when they are the marketable assets that bring in the $$$$$$$$.
I actually don't think it's a bad thing... having different hardness of balls. It's like in hockey with sticks -- some players are using new technology with flexes with get better shots, and gain advantages.