2014 NFL thread: You kiddin me? Playoffs?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Get out of here with your new video technologies. I knew what I remember. :o
 
I would have agreed with you a long time ago, but after watching this last year, I believe that it was legal.

[YT]K_zg-J0q42M[/YT]
The proof is undeniable and 100%, it was legal and a lateral.

gMgm.gif
 
Still didn't win the Super Bowl, so it doesn't matter. :hehe:
 
Get out of here with your new video technologies. I knew what I remember. :o
Don't try to be a revisionist! Clear evidence it was 100% lateral. Anyone trying to argue that, had some kind of bias or something clouding judgment! :shr:

Again...

gMgm.gif


:D
 
Btw looking back at "Calvin Johnson" rule, I think the Dez catch looked far more legit :o Calvin's catch with contact to ground, had the ball like literally parallel to the ground when touching.
 
I think the NFL makes these catch rules far too complicated. If ANY part of the ball hits the ground it should be an incomplete pass. Just my opinion though.
 
The short passing game is so much better then our running game.
 
I think the NFL makes these catch rules far too complicated. If ANY part of the ball hits the ground it should be an incomplete pass. Just my opinion though.
Johnson's wiped out catch though, was much more clear cut imo. Would you agree?

gMgB.gif
 
Many of us may have made quick assumptions on the Bronco's tearing through this game. Luck is in beast mode. :o
 
Looks like Peyton will be spending the next few weeks making more Nationwide commercials.:hehe:
 
Johnson's wiped out catch though, was much more clear cut imo. Would you agree?

Yes. This shouldn't have been a catch since the ball hit the ground on his way down. If he had brought it into his chest, then it should be a catch.

These are the kind of plays that will have a mixed reaction. I just don't think they should be catches if the ball hits the ground in any way, shape or form.
 
Yes. This shouldn't have been a catch since the ball hit the ground on his way down. If he had brought it into his chest, then it should be a catch.

These are the kind of plays that will have a mixed reaction. I just don't think they should be catches if the ball hits the ground in any way, shape or form.
What about ground can't cause a fumble rule?
 
Oh Jesus, Cribbs got killed there. And that might just be what the Broncos need.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,288
Messages
22,079,982
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"