Counter your post? I gave you a counter, you discounted it. And yes, SR was an homage to S:TM, I've never denied that anywhere -- so way to read in. It's just that its a much classier and sleeker S:TM, which actually attempts to create drama and conflict, whlie layering in some very radical and new dynamics.
Moving on to my supposed non-countering of your point:
It amounts to this. You're idea's better: Luthor should've invited Superman to live on New Krypton, despite him already having a Fortresss that resemebles Kryptonian in a beautiful monument.
Your idea. I like how you run over my point about the people not wanting Superman, something the film promised but did not deliver that would have made his sacrifice much more.
So, you're main things was: who's going to pay for that land and how are they going to eat and, what else, lemme check....oh, and Jason was a ploy considering that in the movie that has not yet been made there may be, may be, Kryptonian survivors coming.
I didn't say anything about who will play for the land but it's a good point. What good is currency on New Krypton? Jason WAS a ploy to show Superman he wasn't alone. It was cheap, and would seemingly rest upon a human Clark sleeping with Lois in the fortress before wiping her memory.
So, who would buy a bunch of HI-TECH land? Remember, Kryptonian land is almost living technology. It's technology and land mixed. So, when New Krypton would've FINISHED growing, we don't have a clue what would've come out. For all we know, the rocky protrusions we saw would have cracked and shed to create the glimmering crystal that we know since crystals do orignally start as ugly rock and some rocks are actually cracked open to finds gems. So, we know first and foresmot, an obvoius point nearly everyone missed, was that New Krypton was in its infancy, not even grown to full capacity -- it would've probably grown into a huge contininent of crystals just like the Fortress, with integrated technology and fortressed that could be created as Luthor continued to discover more about the crystals.
So it was going to suddenly turn into a highly polished World? Why didn't the fortress start off this way then? Rocks turning into the beautiful crystal structure.
Who would buy into that? Terrorists, for one. Warlords, two, Displaced peoples, three. To have access to those resources, an unlimited about of power, technology, and knowledge, would be priceless. And as New Krypton reached maturity, that would've been seen.
So Lex, with no real communication to the outside World is going to deal with terrorists from his New Krypton hub? Displaced peoples? Not sure what you mean here. I don't think Lex wanted to share his power with anybody he would just let them live on the land, not access to the crystals where people could fight back against him!
So, where's the food? Well, where was the food on Earth after the Big Bang happened? It takes time.
So how would Lex and co have survived in the futile hope of something growing? Would they go to land and get food, well surely they could then be apprehended there? How would he defend new Krypton? Start throwing chips of crystals into the sea in the vein hope they would turn into weapons?
So, we've established with logic who would buy. We've established that New Krypton was in its infant stages. And, let us also describe, that New Krypton wouldve been a new world order. Also, krytpo-rock is harmless to humans for now, but Luthor may have not seen the long-term effects, as he doesn't in the comics when he gets cancer. But that's good -- that's the fallcy of villanious arrogance.
No. You've generalised who might buy it. And you have assumed New Krypton was in its infant stages. It could just have well stayed like that.
Jason is a ploy? Useless. Well, think of it this way, Kryptonian survivors come back and Jason wants to go with them and not stay on Earth? Is he useless then, or have we introduced yet another dramatic strain that is hard for Superman to deal with? Or, Jason's biology continues to reject his hybrid nature and this group of Kryptonians can save him but have to take him with them. Is he useless then? That these Kryptonians, hope that Superman is not alone, is going to leave him alone on his planet, taking that hope with them, by taking away his son?
Jason's sole purpose in this movie was to show Superman wasn't really alone, as proved with the Brando speech at the end. We don't know when Jason's powers (if ever) will come into full fruition or when he'll find out who is his dad (how did the conception happen again? It's a bit...vague). Him going off with other Kryptonians won't happen until he's 16, unless you think Lois would let her five year old son go into a place where he may or may not survive? He sort of narrows any future films now he's fulfilled his main purpose.
So there's my refutations.