Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter Movie in the Works

Which is why most Hollywood movies are average. Lower standards equals people paying to see anything and everything. I expect the next Avenger films to decrease in quality due to pressure on Disney from other studios pissed that they lost so much money this summer.


Disney would laugh them out of the building with such request. Maybe the other studios should make better quality pictures. Do you think target, jcpenney and macy's would pressure walmart to be less competitive the following christmas time because they got there butts kicked so bad in sales?
 
Which is why most Hollywood movies are average. Lower standards equals people paying to see anything and everything. I expect the next Avenger films to decrease in quality due to pressure on Disney from other studios pissed that they lost so much money this summer.

Doubt it. But, then again I might be entering things from a different perspective. I'm a young writer in the industry. To me 'The Avengers' only challenged me to bring my A game. It threw down a gauntlet. I took it up to say "okay, this thing has to be a million times even more amazing now in the Hollywood to come out of this." Now I could be wrong, but I'm hoping it inspires others to work harder.
 
okay i think avengers is a good movie and all but fans are going overboard with game changer posts

TDK was a game changer avengers was just a fun action movie
 
okay i think avengers is a good movie and all but fans are going overboard with game changer posts

TDK was a game changer avengers was just a fun action movie

They're both game changers.

TDK brought in the side of "make everything dark, gritty and realistic - THEN you will really have a crowd!" Executives and Vice Presidents and a lot of people seriously latched onto this notion that darker was better, I saw that first hand.

What AVENGERS did? It emphasized what you need to make money is a great story, great characters, everything about it extremely well done. It is the same as TDK only on the opposite side of the coin. What did this do? It taught people who thought "audience loves darkness" to re-think that idea entirely.

So TDK shuffled the gaming board, tilting it to one side. AVENGERS leveled it back out and focused everything on how a film is told rather than the tone a film has. It's kind of hard seeing why so many thought TDK was successful because of it's tone and not just telling a good story, but there you have it. Not many outside of Hollywood will see that come into play, but within the gates it's definitely changed things - there's no going back.

Don't think many would see this unless they have seen up close the effect TDK used to have over higher ups.
 
If you think that's what TDK brought to the table... wow. And if you think TDK's contributions to cinema weren't great characters and story, and just the tone... then double wow.
 
great story? come on now

avengers is a fun movie but it is based solely on the characters

character overtake story in avengers

avengers while a good film has a very simple paper thin plot
 
If you think that's what TDK brought to the table... wow. And if you think TDK's contributions to cinema weren't great characters and story, and just the tone... then double wow.

1) I didn't say that.

2) Look at what happened following TDK. Look at the interviews that proceeded it from other companies. Hell, audiences on here thought that was the case too - I denied it, but then saw that they were right first hand - "everyone's making things darker because of TDK!" And yeah, in fact, they were.

Guys you can believe whatever you want to believe. FACT IS? I experienced the effect TDK had on Hollywood at large FIRST HAND. The "make this darker, audiences love darkness like TDK!" FIRST HAND. That's how studios approached it. Many actually picked up on it and those who did? Were right. That was EXACTLY Hollywood thinking during that time.

And PROJECT... Avengers is still ranking SUPREMELY high on Rottentomatoes. Not to mention it's the number 1 movie EVER off of basically a first time at bat. There's no way to notice that.

As said, in Hollywood TDK tilted the playing board -AVENGERS leveled it and now hopefully Hollywood can see the true reason why these movies are successful.
 
Last edited:
Name 5 movies that came after TDK, 5 superhero movies, that were influenced by this supposed trend.
 
If you think that's what TDK brought to the table... wow. And if you think TDK's contributions to cinema weren't great characters and story, and just the tone... then double wow.
i agree imo what TDK did is it transcended the comic book genre tdk was'nt just a batman movie or a comic book movie it was a great crime drama in the vein of HEAT but with a comic book hero at least imo

had nothing to do with it just being dark and gritty
 
1) I didn't say that.

2) Look at what happened following TDK. Look at the interviews that proceeded it from other companies. Hell, audiences on here thought that was the case too - I denied it, but then saw that they were right first hand - "everyone's making things darker because of TDK!" And yeah, in fact, they were.

Guys you can believe whatever you want to believe. FACT IS? I experienced the effect TDK had on Hollywood at large FIRST HAND. The "make this darker, audiences love darkness like TDK!" FIRST HAND. That's how studios approached it. Many actually picked up on it and those who did? Were right. That was EXACTLY Hollywood thinking during that time.

And PROJECT... Avengers is still ranking SUPREMELY high on Rottentomatoes. Not to mention it's the number 1 movie EVER off of basically a first time at bat. There's no way to notice that.

As said, in Hollywood TDK tilted the playing board -AVENGERS leveled it and now hopefully Hollywood can see the true reason why these movies are successful.

See, you're talking about how producers took it. I'm talking about how history took it.

Anyway, the problem is you made it sound as if TDK only brought "teh dark" and The Avengers actually brought "teh art". Which is not the case at all.
 
i agree imo what TDK did is it transcended the comic book genre tdk was'nt just a batman movie or a comic book movie it was a great crime drama in the vein of HEAT but with a comic book hero at least imo

had nothing to do with it just being dark and gritty


Ive been saying that non stop the only comicbook movie that looked to take the dark approach is ASM. Green lantern, IM2, Thor, CA, Avengers all standard lighthearted affair. I think people get it confused with what the dark knight did really. People hear dark and gritty and assume thats what it did but they actually made a really good movie and if you take batman and joker out of that story and insert kingpin bad guy and and upstanding cop you get the same drama. but it just so happen to have batman and the joker. Star wars was a game changer because they influenced scifi movies by making everything looked run down and dirty as opposed to clean prestein like scifi moves that had come before it and it felt not so far in the distant. Plus the introduction of the force aspects and the lightsaber.
 
Lmaol. Guys READ A SINGLE WORD I AM SAYING.

Once again I AM NOT SAYING it had to do with the tone, I thought that would be OBVIOUS by now. Yet again, here I am having to say it again.

Also it wasn't just superhero movies. Thinking that way is... kinda... beyond wrong. It effected A LOT of movies out there. How do I know this? Sit in a meeting where you hear "make it TDK level dark" and you've got the notion. Films in general went bleaker directly following it.

As said, you guys can believe whatever you want - hell you can believe I think it's just the tone when I haven't said ANYTHING of the sort and actually the contrary of that, but hey free countries - I know what I saw and what I heard first hand from within studio walls. And I know AVENGERS being the success that it was did offer me freedom to go back to being lighter without seeing studios watching over me wanting it to be "TDK level dark."

Anyway, the problem is you made it sound as if TDK only brought "teh dark" and The Avengers actually brought "teh art". Which is not the case at all.

Um nope, not at all. I said all the things Avengers has and what makes a good film. Not that TDK didn't have that. Basically Avengers pointed out that THAT is what TDK had going for it - not the tone. That the reason why these films are successful is THAT, not the tone. TDK blinded the people behind the scenes, how? I have no idea. But, it did for a couple of years and now I think they can finally see it was its components and not the tone that made it successful. As said, it got rid of that ball and chain of Hollywood thinking. All those people saying "not everything has to be dark!" ? They picked up on it. I didn't want to believe they were right at first, but sadly got proven wrong.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I'll drop it, I was just compelled to point out my extreme disagreement with Ultimatehero.

PS: Ulty, I wish you the best in the industry. It's tough out there and I hope you can make it. But come on, if you want to bring your A-game, there are hundreds of other movies that can challenge and inspire you in the writing department. Step it up, man!
 
okay i think avengers is a good movie and all but fans are going overboard with game changer posts

TDK was a game changer avengers was just a fun action movie

TDK encouraged gritty realism for future comic book movies and reboots. Avengers completely destroyed the prospects for 2 entire months of summer movies by raising the public's standards.

Both were game changers in different ways.
 
TDK encouraged gritty realism for future comic book movies and reboots. Avengers completely destroyed the prospects for 2 entire months of summer movies by raising the public's standards.

Both were game changers in different ways.

Again, that was what the studio suits started thinking, not the people. As soon as WB announced a darker and grittier approach for Superman, there was a fan backlash.
 
Ultimatehero, gotcha. Sorry for the misunderstanding! And again, good luck with your future endeavours!
 
Its amazing sometimes how batman can immediately spark a huge debate in any thread. its always batman vs insert any marvel movie. It really shows how much DC is a puccy company for not crreating many other characters except for the CW network.
 
TDK encouraged gritty realism for future comic book movies and reboots. Avengers completely destroyed the prospects for 2 entire months of summer movies by raising the public's standards.

Both were game changers in different ways.
:ox men did that over 10 years ago
 
Yeah, I'll drop it, I was just compelled to point out my extreme disagreement with Ultimatehero.

PS: Ulty, I wish you the best in the industry. It's tough out there and I hope you can make it. But come on, if you want to bring your A-game, there are hundreds of other movies that can challenge and inspire you in the writing department. Step it up, man!

Unsure what disagreement since I believe TDK was success for being a great movie, not the tone, and saying the execs vps etc believed it was the tone - NOT that I believed it was the tone. Which for some reason you took it as.

Got the connections. It's set. Let's just say after one brash with "make it TDK level dark!" during a meeting I almost sold out with another property that HAS to be light and the complete opposite of TDK dark. What that made me do was go back to the drawing board, back to how I like telling stories and no longer feel pressured to make what should have been a light tale dark and gritty to appease the guild of elders. Basically how Mark Steven Johnson went from DAREDEVIL: DIRECTOR'S CUT to GHOST RIDER - how Fox handled it, I seriously think sent him for a loop. Hear what they want from you? Hear some of the backward thinking? Yeah, especially starting out - it can get to you.

:ox men did that over 10 years ago

Actually BATMAN BEGINS started that trend which then really came to light with THE DARK KNIGHT. "We wanted Bond to be more like Batman in Batman Begins, going dark and grittier than before." Come on, I can't be the only guy to remember those kinds of quotes for DOZENS of movies over the years. Plus it didn't seem to create that mandate of "make it TDK level dark!" from the guys at large.

--------

TDK was a game changers in Hollywood because it focused things on dark and gritty. I should note it was a game changer to fans and general audience members because of it's quality. But to Hollywood - yeah, it was it's tone.

AVENGERS was a game change in Hollywood because it showed very light or very dark can equally be a powerful force both critically and box office wise to have to contend with. Basically it refocused everything on story and character and aesthetics bringing and even more powerful light to TDK making Hollywood realize the true reason of why that film was successful and that it didn't have anything to do with the tone. It evened both out.

If AVENGERS came first we would see a Hollywood that focused on expanding special effects, adding in over the top wars, and making everything lighter to then be balanced by TDK rather than the other way around. One of them - eh, Hollywood's gonna be confused. Two of them equal the other to it's true intent and purposes.
 
Last edited:
So yeah, about AL:VH, anyone have a favorite scene?
 
I think I can honestly say I hope ultimatehero fails horribly in Hollywood purely so maybe then he'll stop talking like he's our own personal Harvey Weinstein. :o
 
I wish you all the best, S. :up:
 
Good luck Kane you filthy bastard. :up:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"