metaphysician
Not a Side-Kick
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2012
- Messages
- 16,124
- Reaction score
- 5,045
- Points
- 103
I always figured they'd deal with QS by having Hawkeye use his marksman skills on him.
I don't see any other method to stop him really, but wtf do I know, I don't even read comics.
God, I hope not. That's always one of the dumbest things in comics, where a guy running around at super speed somehow gets hit by an attack that should be stationary from his perspective. Only thing worse is when a speedster decides to run around their enemy, and somehow decides to clothesline themselves against a completely-stationary extended arm.
 
				 
						
 
 
		 
 
		 
	 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 He doesn't need the armour to be considered a 'hero'. He simply knows he's a hero with or without the armour. That was the whole damn point of IM3. He was using the armour as a comfort blanket, thinking that without it, he was nothing. IM3 basically showed he can do a lot of the stuff outside the armour and that his greatest weapon is not the armour, but his intellect. I'm not trying to justify anything, I'm elborating on what was shown and said in the film(something that clearly went over you head). It's fine if you didn't like the film but Tony's character arc was very clear and defined.
 He doesn't need the armour to be considered a 'hero'. He simply knows he's a hero with or without the armour. That was the whole damn point of IM3. He was using the armour as a comfort blanket, thinking that without it, he was nothing. IM3 basically showed he can do a lot of the stuff outside the armour and that his greatest weapon is not the armour, but his intellect. I'm not trying to justify anything, I'm elborating on what was shown and said in the film(something that clearly went over you head). It's fine if you didn't like the film but Tony's character arc was very clear and defined. 
 
		

 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		