You mean... 1080p games will loook better than 720p/1080i games? You don't say!Avalanche said:More suggestions that the PS3 is more powerful than the 360. We all knew the PS3 had the slight edge, and no doubt with time the best looking PS3 games will have a slight edge graphically over the best looking 360 games.
For now, the 360 still has the best looking games. The PS3 will catch up and surpass within a year.
Given the consoles are so close in terms of power, it's not that much of a stretch to think a better looking game might be developed on the PS3 in the near future.SpiderFan17 said:Not saying it's not potentially true, but you ARE really jumping the gun on this.
The thread was about PS3 games looking better than 360 games according to Activison. Therefore, talking about how PS3 games may gain a graphical edge in the future wasn't off-topic at all. The topic was about PS3 games looking better. Shaders were just one justification used.Zordon said:You never mentioned shaders? That's great. This thread is about a game that looks better because of shaders. So in essence, you made a post that was off topic in addition to being wrong. Nice to know.
So the first post, the post that determines the direction of the thread, isn't about a guy who was invited to Activision to view their games, Ultimate Alliance in particuliar? And that guy didn't specifically mention shaders as the reason it looks better? Wow. Once again, the bar on the internet has just been lowered. You know, occasionally, it's ok to be wrong in a real life conversation. It's in real time, so you don't always have the time to think, and you also don't always have the information you need right in front of you. The internet is an entirely different story. The information you needed to view to be correct (the first post, something you should view by default before posting to threads for future reference by the way, no need to thank me) was but a mere click away, and you had all the time in the world. And yet, still wrong. BafflingAvalanche said:The thread was about PS3 games looking better than 360 games according to Activison. Therefore, talking about how PS3 games may gain a graphical edge in the future wasn't off-topic at all. The topic was about PS3 games looking better. Shaders were just one justification used.
Sheesh. You are having trouble following these discussions.
A better looking game? Definitely. I have no doubt. A few? Why not?Avalanche said:Given the consoles are so close in terms of power, it's not that much of a stretch to think a better looking game might be developed on the PS3 in the near future.
No, I'll agree with you there. I don't expect PS3 games to look better than 360 games across the board. Just that at some point the PS3 will have a game that looks better than any 360 game before. The two systems will probably alternate between which has the better looking game a few years down the line.SpiderFan17 said:A better looking game? Definitely. I have no doubt. A few? Why not?
All of the best ps3 games being better than ALL the best 360 games? THAT is what I take issue with, and say is a bold claim. You are guaranteeing 100% that the PS3's top-tier games will beat out the 360's. That exact statement is very doubtful, you have to admit.