sinewave said:Hey, Rayne's back! Yay!!!
roach said:as a member of the US military this story puzzles me on several levels.
If I was in another country and the US started attacking the country my first inclination would be to get out. Now if I decided to stay to complete my filming the instant US troops came up on me they would know I was an American and prior service. The troops in Iraq have email capability as I have recieve several emails from my buddies over there. The military has a database they can go to to check to see if he was in the military. All this verification takes about a day or two....which leads me to question what really happened....
....and for the guys crying out for the people held at Gitmo...where is the public outcry for the soldiers accused(not charged) of the massacre in Hayditha. They are being held in a maximum security military prison in California.
But you're not, so the hypothetical helped nothing but post countWar Lord said:That depends on secure they needed the transmission of the identity of the ex-soldier. If in the commander's eyes that email wasn't sufficiently secure, than they would have had to courier the information back and forth.
If I were military and I had ex-military running around a war zone for no real reason other than self-proclaimed ones and being caught with bomb making material, I'd be vetting this guy's butt until the cows came home.
Addendum said:But you're not, so the hypothetical helped nothing but post count
Addendum said:So who cares what you would if you were in the Canadian military?
Addendum said:Which is in your mommy's house, looking over your shoulder for your nephew's dangerous wet spaghetti punches...
...That was a joke...
http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/fic_ton.htmlTruthteller said:Hmmmmm... green flag, black cross with a white border. That looks vaguely Scandinavian. What flag is that Addendum?
Thanks Rayne. Hope you are as well and good to see you.Rayne said:...Hope you all are well.
I've liked it since I first saw it in '96. Been a Type O Negative fan since I first heard them in '93.Truthteller said:Ahh. Interesting. So I was partially right. It does have some derivation from the Norse lands... Looks good.
War Lord said:That depends on secure they needed the transmission of the identity of the ex-soldier. If in the commander's eyes that email wasn't sufficiently secure, than they would have had to courier the information back and forth.
psst...bored said:Okay, I'm only half sure what you said, so let me see if I can clarify: you're saying that if the C.O. isn't sure that the e-mail is secure, it could take them a long time to figure out if the guy was legit or not?
bored said:I've noticed. Especially with what I think he was saying, pretty weak against the word of an actual member of the US Armed Forces.
bored said:Okay, I'm only half sure what you said, so let me see if I can clarify: you're saying that if the C.O. isn't sure that the e-mail is secure, it could take them a long time to figure out if the guy was legit or not?
Addendum said:psst...
Jonty just wants to be like O'Reilly and other "pundits" on the tv. He's an expert on nothing
Addendum said:No, I'm keeping a healthy amount of skepticism.
I have never blindly trusted anyone, nor is anyone deserving
Addendum said:So when should I care
lolWar Lord said:When your ass is in court because somebody's suing you for libel.
That's a pretty good time to care.