He doesn't know what "begs the question" means. He needs some education. He should take a college class or something.
I agree with him for the most part though. However I would say that "education" is valuable while "information" is not. In college I was often told "do not use the internet to research" and I just saw an episode of X-Men Evolution (shut up, I was bored) where the same kind of teaching was done to Xavier's kids.
Is that bad? Necessarily it isn't. What the "internet" revolution does to education is not liberate it and make it free what the internet revolution does is make information easily available.
However practically employers are not in the business of hiring people who have access to information but who are educated. Institutional education isn't about providing information to a person it's about sparking interests so that students who are educated can go and do something and build creativity onto their education and experience.
That being said: I use NONE of what I went to college for in my job and my job doesn't even require a college degree, but I'm sure that having a college degree helped me get the job because my employer can see that I have the desire to complete practical education.
Futhermore if someone has the necessary drives to build creativity on their education they can be every bit as successful and have every bit as much impact with or without institutional education. But that person will not have as easy a time as someone with a degree.
So it amounts to this. He is right totally and completely. But no one is going to hire someone who's education comes from the internet so buck up and do the ****.