Ant-Man Ant-man's reviews thread

[Vincanws]

I actually didn't think Guardians looked all that great in 3D. I'm a little nervous about how it might work in Ant-Man.

Fair enough. For me, a movie like Guardians has more of a demand for the 3D opportunities it can offer, albeit as with any 3D feature, the moments of any real added value are still quite few and far between.

 

[DACrowe]

Another average movie from Marvel Studios. I liked the creative flourishes leftover from Edgar Wright (like all the secondhand storyteller flashbacks and a few of the action sequences with their tongue in their cheek while on a toy train set, etc.). But it was otherwise a generic superhero film. Yawn. 6/10

Marvel, do better.

 

[Thegeekfreax]

I thought it was a great film, very entertaining and enjoyable, the cast great performances.
I give it 9/10

 

[Guard82]

I just saw it and I loved it. It was immensely satisfying, with an engaging story that has lots of heart and energy. I loved the interactions among Scott, Hank, and Hope. The three of them worked so well together. I also loved the hilarious contributions from Michael Pena's character and the rest of Scott's friends.

The cinematography and the visuals were terrific. This movie did a great job of showcasing Ant-Man's powers. The way they depicted the shrinking and the control of ants made for some excellent visuals. Finally, I loved how they utilized the concept of passing on the legacy of a superhero to a new person, which is something you don't see every day in a movie. All in all, it was a really good experience.

 

[Keyser Soze]

ANT-MAN is another success from Marvel Studios, which has now gotten to the point where it can seemingly pump out solid blockbusters in its sleep. This one is noteworthy in that much of it doesn't particularly feel like a Marvel movie, boasting an aesthetic all its own. In a lot of ways, there are flourishes and story beats where you can really feel this film's origins as an Edgar Wright project. And there is a certain ghost that hangs over ANT-MAN where, as good as it is, is there an Edgar Wright ANT-MAN out there in a parallel universe somewhere that's even better? But that doesn't detract too much from the enjoyment of what is a deeply fun, inventive film.

Paul Rudd plays Scott Lang, a down-on-his-luck ex-con who dons the Ant-Man suit to stop the technology of Hank Pym (Michael Douglas, seemingly having the most fun he's had in a film in ages) finding its way into the wrong hands. Paul Rudd is one of the movie's big strengths. His natural charisma is perhaps more downplayed here than Robert Downey Jr's Iron Man or Chris Pratt's Star-Lord, but his inherent likeability shines through to make Scott Lang one of Marvel's most relatable heroes. Some Marvel Cinematic Universe enthusiasts might have wondered what place there was for Ant-Man in this shared universe, but Rudd gives Lang a blue-collar charm that marks out his own niche, with his relationship with his daughter making him even more sympathetic.

On the other side of the coin, if you were to tell me a couple of months ago that Darren Cross would be a more frightening Marvel villain than Ultron, I would likely have laughed in your face, but credit to Corey Stoll, he pulls it off. He has the corporate sleazebag routine I was expecting down pat, but under that veneer he also portrays a chilling psychopath one perceived slight short of snapping, all brimming rage and resentment, making him an often uncomfortable screen presence and quickly marking him out as one of the more memorable villains in the Marvel filmography. The supporting cast is filled out by a solid performance from Evangeline Lilly as Hope Van Dyne, and show-stealing turns from Michael Pena and co as Scott Lang's goofy sidekicks.

The movie as a whole is very good, but what elevates it into the great territory for me is the climactic action set-piece. All through the movie, the shrinking effects are magnificently executed, all the more impressive in immersive 3D IMAX, and it adds a new twist to an old genre to turn this into as thrilling a heist film as it is a superhero film. But director Peyton Reed really cuts loose and shows his chops once we get into the closing fight, filled with people and objects shrinking and growing, and the kinetic camera work keeping you on the edge of your seat. Plus, refreshingly (and appropriately, given the title), rather than going bigger like Marvel always seems to do in its third act, the climax here goes smaller, more personal, to great effect.

ANT-MAN wasn't a movie I was particularly anticipating, which is unusual, given how much I tend to be hyped for all the Marvel films. But I ended up enjoying it a great deal. Top notch summer movie fun!

 

[Flint Marko]

I'm seeing this again tomorrow so I can really get a feel for it, but I really enjoyed it on my first viewing. I went with two friends who both had their reservations about the movie, one of whom told me on the ride over there that he wasn't excited about it at all. They both walked out saying they would definitely pay to see it a second time.

 

[Man in the Suit]

I loved it. It's my third favorite Marvel movie behind TWS and GOTG.

I liked the creative flourishes leftover from Edgar Wright (like all the secondhand storyteller flashbacks)

That was Peyton Reed. http://www.aintitcool.com/node/72397

 

[Poetic Chaos]

This felt very unique as far powers/action goes compared to the rest of the MCU. His fight with Falcoln definitely has me excited for a Civil War appearance.

 

[Vincanws]

More on the differences between Edgar's script and the McKay/Rudd/Reed re-write:
http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2015...ins-the-differences-from-edgar-wright-version

Note spoilers. Reed has been frequently relaxed about spoiling every conceivable thing about his movie in interviews.

 

[jmc]

I really don't get this whole, "what's the point?" Attitude.

Ever since the Comicbook movie universe has exploded I can't help but feel that a handful of fans have become so pretentious towards the genre.

Ant-Man isn't a cinematic masterpiece, but it's just straight solid entertainment. It's not overly complicated nor is it taking itself too seriously. It's fun. Isn't that ultimately the point of summer movies?

If you wearn't entertained and didn't find it to be that good, fair enough. But to question the entire purpose of making the film? I'm sorry but that type of 'holier than thou' mentality is just off-putting.

I equally don't why so many of you are accepting of mediocrity.

 

[Keyser Soze]

More on the differences between Edgar's script and the McKay/Rudd/Reed re-write:
http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2015...ins-the-differences-from-edgar-wright-version

Note spoilers. Reed has been frequently relaxed about spoiling every conceivable thing about his movie in interviews.

That's interesting. That whole "he said/she said" sequence was one of the most Edgar Wright things in the film, so quite surprising that was added later.

 

[Vincanws]

I loved it. It's my third favorite Marvel movie behind TWS and GOTG.


That was Peyton Reed. http://www.aintitcool.com/node/72397

Indeed, it's another thing about certain reviews of this movie. This presumption that parts that worked must owe some debt to Edgar's involvement somehow. As it turns out, Reed has been pretty open about a lot of the changes that didn't involve Edgar and given Edgar credit for what he did bring, so a lot of those things are sort being stopped dead in there tracks..credit where credit's due and all that.

As a huge Edgar fan I personally look forward to the next Edgar Wright movie, but people should stop reviewing this one as if it's a missed opportunity and looking for Edgar's fingerprints all over it.

 

[Vincanws]

That's interesting. That whole "he said/she said" sequence was one of the most Edgar Wright things in the film, so quite surprising that was added later.

You can argue it might be Edgar-inspired, because as you say, it is quite an Edgar-like thing, with the quick camera moves and zips and what have you, but I still think that's doing a disservice to Peyton, as this is his movie after all. And doing such things is not like an Edgar invention or anything.

 

[Sean of Justice]

More on the differences between Edgar's script and the McKay/Rudd/Reed re-write:
http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2015...ins-the-differences-from-edgar-wright-version

Try saying that three times fast.

Note spoilers. Reed has been frequently relaxed about spoiling every conceivable thing about his movie in interviews.

Danny Boyle's kinda the same way. He doesn't really care about spoilers.

 

[TeeKay]

I equally don't why so many of you are accepting of mediocrity.

Speak for yourself.

 

[GNR]

Some of the best visuals in any MCU film.

Well developed characters and a great lead in Rudd.

Loved the light/comedic tone and the fact that this was a very isolated final battle with the fate of the world not in the balance.

A standout from the 12 movies we've seen so far.

 

[roach]

I thought this was an ok film. Not great, not bad.

 

[Sean of Justice]

Some of the best visuals in any MCU film.

Well developed characters and a great lead in Rudd.

Loved the light/comedic tone and the fact that this was a very isolated final battle with the fate of the world not in the balance.

A standout from the 12 movies we've seen so far.

12 entries in the one series in 7 years. Kind of amazing when you think about it.

 

[MaatMattos]

Good film.
Didn't expect any better, and also didn't disappoint me

 

[The Joker]

Loved this movie. Loved, LOVED it. Great cast, engaging story, fantastic humor, splendid action. What more could I want?

10/10

 

[Moridin]

Saw it earlier. It's just average. Most of it had a very lax way about it, like it was going through the motions. Didn't really have much snap or purpose to it, pace really dragged throughout.

Cast is good, but don't have much of anything to work with character wise. Liked Rudd in the role. Enjoyed Pena the most probably.

Story was standard, like characterisations felt kind of sparse..

Wasn't nearly as funny as I was expecting.

Effects were great.

That cameo section stuck out like a sore thumb. Actually both of them did, the one at the start and the other one.

Overall, ho-hum. 6/10

The new fiance cop thing, very much seemed like an Edgar Wright bit left in the script. I agree it was an unnecessary element, that they probably should have dropped entirely. The only bit I liked with him was at the very end at the dinner table.

Cannavale joined after the rewrites. So unless he took over Patrick Wilsons role, it was a new part.

Stoll, Greer, Slatery, & TI also joined after re-writes.

 

[JtheDreamer]

Long time lurker. Going to see this movie tonight and wanted to say how nice it is to see how well this movie has turned out in the eyes of many, especially considering the doom and gloom that was cast over this film when Wright departed. Heck, even I was a bit skeptical .... not because of the directorial change, but because I felt the property was corny.

I'm not surprised to see the usual suspects in here knocking yet another Marvel film though. It's the same handful of guys who's snobby contrarianism never tires. I bet it's driving them C-R-A-Z-Y that it's a percentage shy of 80% on RT.

 

[Sean of Justice]

Loved this movie. Loved, LOVED it. Great cast, engaging story, fantastic humor, splendid action. What more could I want?

10/10

I think yours is the first 10/10 review I've seen here.

 

[samsnee]

I loved it. It's my third favorite Marvel movie behind TWS and GOTG.


That was Peyton Reed. http://www.aintitcool.com/node/72397

And yet I've read negative reviews that have said those scenes were the best parts and you could tell it woild have been a better movie if Edgar had stayed on. Goes to show that some reviewers were gonna hate on this movie no matter what.

 

[Sean of Justice]

And yet I've read negative reviews that have said those scenes were the best parts and you could tell it woild have been a better movie if Edgar had stayed on. Goes to show that some reviewers were gonna hate on this movie no matter what.

Kinda reminds me of the critic in Birdman who said, "I'm gonna close your play. Would you like to know why? Because I hate you and everyone you represent."