Uncle Ben,
You killed him in the first movie and he continues to show up. It's like he is haunting Peter.
Call an exorcist. No wonder the kid became spider-man, his uncle probably nagged him from beyond the grave until he gave in
t:
In all seriousness, introduce a character only if the story requires it. Does Norman Osborn need to be introduced at the beginning of the mythos? Probably not. He owns his own company, and has a distant relationship with his son. The fact that there would be very little if any Norman Osborn in the first movie would make sense and show how he is more concerned with other matters other than his son's high school problems.
I would love the first spider-man villain to be Smythe. Spider-Man has created a real problem for New York's Underground, run by Hammerhead. They manipulate Smythe, who is an Osborn Robotics Engineer, to assist them in creating high-tech gear to fight off spider-man. He creates the Spider-Slayer as well as some other weapons for their use. by the third act, Hammerhead's right hand man Herman Schultz, as Hammerhead himself would not get his hands dirty, bares witness as the spider-slayer is destroyed. He takes on Spider-Man one on one using some of Smythes tech weapons (the shocker gauntlets). Only to be defeated and implicated as the head of illegal weapons being sold. Smythe goes missing, assumed killed by Hammerhead's men.
Hammerhead is under investigation due to his association with Schultz but with no direct charges, but more importantly, SHIELD is now threatening Osborn (making his first appearance by the end of the movie) as his company was tied to the engineering of the weapons which are now on the street.
just me daydreaming lol. Kind of went off on a rant there.