MagnarTheGreat
Web Magician
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2011
- Messages
- 46,432
- Reaction score
- 26,958
- Points
- 103
Yeah as I said earlier in the thread, the U.K. press could potentially just be weighing down the RT% for you watchers out there.
That review actully has postive things to say about viper.
Wow, I love that it's ratcheting up now (76%!) as some of the more mainstream (non-UK, LOL) review sites start to chime in in. Hoping the trend continues. And the wait to see it is killing me.
Well most reviews have called her the low point of film.Although maybe she Is too much of a comic booky villain for most critics.She has been compared to poison Ivy but nothing I have seen In promation hints at her being that bad.
She's not bad. She just doesn't mesh with everything else going on in the movie because her outfit/powers/portrayal are purposefully campy.
Think of it like this: Throw Hugo Weaving's Red Skull in The Dark Knight. Not as a replacement villain, just an add on. Would feel off, no?
That's some terrible journalism from Contact Music.
Yes, a "slamming" from critics. That did not happen at any point.
72% hopefully some more positive reviews show up fast.If it can stay in the mid/high70's until 2moro then the fresh stamp is inevitable.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/24/wolverine-review-hugh-jackman_n_3646512.htmlDon't get us wrong. We don't mean to take anything away from the more substantial qualities of "The Wolverine," a fairly satisfying if not stellar installment in the saga of the famous mutant that Hugh Jackman's been playing since, wow, 2000. (For a little perspective, Bill Clinton was still president.)
But let's just point out that Jackman bares it all in a brief but memorable scene in a bathtub, and the studio would be wise to advertise this scene as much as possible. Because Wolverine is all about Jackman, and not only is the actor in amazing shape, but he's funny in the scene, too. So why not flaunt it?