Arnold Is Back for Terminator 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think you need to lighten up, man. And I was referring to Terminator 3, not you personally with ass pulls. Unless you had a hand in writing it.

Anyway, if it's going to make you all upset, forget about it.

That's fine, and I'm cool with that. But still the Bay remark, I did not care for that. However, I did have these ideas before they made T3, they generalized em and made them not very good IMO. But to me even before T3 I always saw T1 and T2 as this knowing they would have to continue T3 which I wish they would have under better circumstances.
 
I also want to mention that there were still things to get done. Dyson makes the claim, "Baby, I am this close!" I don't doubt he was the only man doing research on this. I'm ready to believe that the Board of Directors gave it to a few others and said, "go to town." And if they have research Dyson has, they might have had it on their own personal computers at home as well.

But, Dyson is the one that makes the break-through according to the Uncle Bob. He doesn't do that at the end of T2. He dies with his research because... "Baby, I am this close!" That means that CyberDyne would looking to their other living scientists and making conclusions based on their research and understanding of the material. CyberDyne might not actually have been aware just how close they were with Dyson because they were still signing the physical property out for more testing just two days before the building blew.
 
I doubt you could get much out of a severed, mangled arm. If it was even recognizable as an arm.

No one ever brings up the original Terminator's legs.

I don't think it was damaged that badly, albeit it was left in worse condition than the original T800's arm :oldrazz: I'm just saying -- it's there if Cyberdyne wants it. If they lost one arm, they might just be interested in another one.
 
Obviously the intern with the lollipop finished the work. It's all his fault.
 
I don't think it was damaged that badly, albeit it was left in worse condition than the original T800's arm :oldrazz: I'm just saying -- it's there if Cyberdyne wants it. If they lost one arm, they might just be interested in another one.

There isn't anything to get out of the Terminator arm. It's the chip, and it's always been the chip.
 
chip1hd.jpg

The chip from T2. From the T-800 from T1.
 
The best scene in salvation was with the robocycles and GnR man they should have dragged that out a few more beats.

You got to admit the movie had some cool visuals...also loved the giant T scene
 
So I'm watching the original and Reese clearly states to Sahrah that he's from "one possible future" "i dont know (how it works)...


So I think Cameron even in Part 1 established the possibility of different timelines.


I do agree that it was not smart to get to convuluted here..but it's not like it was a violation of the principals the series was based on.
 
Yes but Reese even admitted he does not know how it works. So to me that always canceled out that line. He was just a grunt, not Skynet. So to me I never took what he said about that to be nothing just because he admits he has no idea.

But I'm interested to see what Ellison does with this, she and her Brother are great producers, and I admit that gives me hope for Terminator that I have not had in a long long long time.
 
Yes but Reese even admitted he does not know how it works. So to me that always canceled out that line. He was just a grunt, not Skynet. So to me I never took what he said about that to be nothing just because he admits he has no idea.

It's possible...really what it does is confuse the viewer more. I don't know if there was a lot of calculation behind it at the time either. It may have been said as a roundabout way to reassure the audience.
 
*cough*Self-promoting ****e*cough*


:oldrazz:
 
Offering sexual favors. What's your point? :o
 
NOBODY ASKED YOU, PATRICE!!! :cmad:
 
The trouble with any of the sequels is that they don't address why they chose the particular time periods to go back into. Why do they keep waiting until John gets older?


I'd be very interested if this was Terminators and something like Arnold playing a Terminatrix that has to take down other terminators
 
The trouble with any of the sequels is that they don't address why they chose the particular time periods to go back into. Why do they keep waiting until John gets older?

Actually this is explained. Skynet have limited records and send terminators back to the points they can locate Connor activity. The original script for T2 included a scene in the future where John sends a protector back and it is implied that Skynet sent the original T-800 and the T-1000 prototype at the same time. The T-1000 is sent to the only time John Connor appears on "the grid", as his mother kept him in hiding until she was arrested, and they go back into hiding after the events of T2. The events of the original film can be seen as a plan B, where Skynet target Sarah before she disappears herself with a regular terminator model.

T3 is a little more shakey because it isn't as strongly scripted. The TX is sent back to kill John's leutenants, but I've always thought the timing and its' actions imply that it was also instrumental in jump-starting Judgement Day itself. We see it connect to the internet and shortly after CRS starts to have issues with a "computer virus".
 
Kalogridis and Lussier to Write the New Terminator Movie

http://www.superherohype.com/news/a...and-lussier-to-write-the-new-terminator-movie

Patrick Lussier and Laeta Kalogridis are teaming up to script the next installment of The Terminator franchise, reports Deadline.

Lussier directed Drive Angry and My Bloody Valentine 3D and Kalogridis penned Shutter Island and did some script work on James Cameron's Avatar.

The new film is being spearheaded by Skydance Productions and Annapurna Pictures.

Lussier and Kalogridis were previously rebooting The Rifleman for television with a pilot to be directed by Chris Columbus. There has been no word on that in a while.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,272
Messages
22,077,927
Members
45,878
Latest member
Remembrance1988
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"