• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Bale Faces Crowe in 3:10 to Yuma

Rate the movie

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1


Results are only viewable after voting.
P.S. Speaking of the Proposition, anyone seen Seraphim Falls?

Falls is essientially a variation on The Proposition, except more Ford-ish.

It starred Liam Neeson and Pierce Brosnan and surprisingly Brosnan upstaged Neeson in it. I thought it was average (not bad for a western these days) with pretty imagery and great subtle acting in the large landscapes of New Mexico and Colorado (where it was shot) but the storyline was too thin and conventional.

It also would have worked better without *the* flashback where the past is revealed and it is far less dark than the movie implies and the mind conjures by itself. The movie would have been better without that scene. A lot better. As it is, it has several extremely intense and satisfying scenes one involving a waterfall, another a horse and another a bullet wound. It's cereberal finale is religious, biblical and satisfying, yet somewhat empty and hallow at the same time.

It was disappointing but any fan of the genre should give it a try though.

I saw Seraphim Falls a long time ago. Bronson was great in it. And yeah...I pretty much thought the whole ending kinda ruined the movie for me. I see what they were trying to do...but it was just too unsatisfying...though....I can't imagine any other way to do it. Cause both men were wrong...and right in what they doing. There was no bad guy.
 
Bale has played JESUS...then a serial killer...then BATMAN....rightttt...he has no versatility.:whatever:
Let us not forget one of his best performances to date, Dieter Dengler from Rescue Dawn, a character who was so optimistic and happy, even when captured. One of his best.
 
Let us not forget one of his best performances to date, Dieter Dengler from Rescue Dawn, a character who was so optimistic and happy, even when captured. One of his best.


I just saw that last week. He was great in that. Kind of like Steve McQueen from the great escape....only messy.

that part when steve zahn suddenly gets killed was the most suprising
A great movie more poeple should have seen.

Anyone seen that movie he did...Harsh Times. He was intense in that one.
 
I still dont know abot bales versatilty as an actor all his roles seem to be variations on the dark grim character to me he is good but someone like Val Kilmer or Gary oldman are miles better IMO.

Empire of the Sun
Little Women
VELVET GOLDMINE

he's versatile.
 
hopefully amazon will ship out my copy on Blu-Ray tomorrow :word:
 
Bought this today...can't wait to watch it :up:
 
Just asking cuz I've seen very few of his movies. Batman and Yuma...two very different characters.

I also saw that dragon movie and Shaft but don't remember much and there probably wasn't much to work with in those roles anyway from what I recall.
 
But did he play them all alike?
no way he's brought something different to every character he plays. and he doesn't just play the character he becomes the character, he doesn't break until the movie is done shooting.(although he said he'd never do that for his daughter)
 
Saw it. Pretty good. I don't like giving number ratings to movies, but I give it an 8. Nothing truly spectacular, but a pretty good movie none the less.
 
Saw it again.

A decent, pretty mindless action western. I still don't understand the praise it's getting for being some deep, ambiguous character study between Crowe and Bale. The script is pretty piss poor, and the characters are all pretty much cookie cutter cliches. Giving the hero a skeleton in his closet and having the anti hero kill a few "eeevil" cops doesn't really change that for me.
 
The Original with Glenn Ford and Van Heflin was a character driven movie. In fact it is almost a different movie all together. Hollywood took a great film and made it mediocer.

Glenn played Wade calm. Like killing wasn't a big deal, it was just something that happens. Wade was always calm and collected. He was a talker, ver smooth and manipulative.

Van Heflin's Dan Evans was an everyman. He fought in the war and was tired of killing. But when Wade came to town and no one else would take him to the train he volintered. $200 would get him water rights and save his cattle.

The movie was short on action. Instead it was character driven. The majority of it was Wade trying to tempt Dan to let him go. Very psycological. Something the new one lacked.

We got Wade as a wack job killer, Dan as a guy trying to redeam himself for something I missed, and a whinny little kid. The only thing it had in comen was they were trying to make a train.

Where was Alex, the town drunk? In the original he was the only one who stayed with Dan. It cost him his life. Dan gave a powerful speech after Alex died that summed up what the movie was about. That you have to believe in something enough to die for it. The new one made it all about money.

In the end it was an okay movie. Not one that stands out. Instead of keeping what was great about the original it tried to conform to the typical modern western.
 
I'm not a big fan of the original. I enjoyed this version a lot more.
 
Tremendous flick, hands down. :up: I had absolutely no expectations (except expecting Bale to be awesome) and was really surprised how good it was. I should rewatch it.
 
1st half was great, particularly the sloshing sounds of Crowe stabbing the neck. something happens towards the middle/end and it just threw me right off. great acting! Foster rules this...
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"