Invader Joker
Superhero
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2012
- Messages
- 9,249
- Reaction score
- 7,445
- Points
- 103
Robin is a teenager with no superpowers. Having him in the movie would make Batman seem like a child abuser.
Robin is a teenager with no superpowers. Having him in the movie would make Batman seem like a child abuser.
Damn son, that's just wrong!!!Graysons have a tendency of being grounded.
Would you put your son into life and death traumatizing scenarios? There's a reason why even comic book writers like Scott Snyder don't feel that comfortable writing the robins.
There's a reason Nolan avoided the Bat Family entirely.
I doubt Barbara will show up in this film. The DC films are rumored to be back to being independent of each other. If they are planning on making a Batgirl film in the near future then they may not want to introduce another version of the character in this film.
Anyway Thandie Newton's daughter Nico Parker (from Disney's live action Dumbo film) would be my pick.
That was a comedy..
If IT (a horror film that features children being brutally murdered by a monster clown) can become the highest grossing horror film of all time
Then they can accept a 14 year old, orphaned Dick Grayson, being taken under Wayne's wing and trained to avenge his parents in the same way Bruce goes out every night to avenge his
No matter which way you frame it, Batman will still look like a child abuser especially if it's a "grounded" take again, which it seems like it'll be.This kind of sums it up for me. I want teenage Robin. Not little kid Robin. Not 20-something Chris O'Donnell Robin. 14-16 years old. We haven't had a believably teenage Robin in decades, and that needs to change. Without Robin 1) We never see the father/mentor aspect of Bruce's character and 2) We never get Nightwing. I'm sorry, but you can't skip the Robin stage and go straight to Nightwing. It's part of Nightwing's character development. He stepped out of Batman's shadow to be his own man. He can't step out of a shadow he was never really in, can he?
This isn't real life, people. This is a movie, where a bunch of kids/teens can go and evade murderous thieves to find a mythical pirate treasure (Goonies) or, as mentioned above, a bunch of kids can battle a child-eating demon clown (It). Even so, imagine a 15 year old boy who's been trained as a circus acrobat since he was little (and who knows what other skills he happened to pick up along the way) training day and night with the world's greatest athlete and martial artist in order to avenge the deaths of his parents. Even the most ardent critic of Robin has to concede it's a little different than bringing some random kid out with you. Dick Grayson was prepped for this. He was trained to be Batman's heir. He NEEDS to show up, AS ROBIN, in this new trilogy.
Hell, you can even make that a point in a future film of why Jason Todd is Batman's greatest failure: he was kind of rushed into it and never given the kind of time to learn that Grayson got.
Who cares what he looks like? Why not tell the story to develop the situation? But with the supposed seeming more villains being involved, I don't see it being that grounded.No matter which way you frame it, Batman will still look like a child abuser especially if it's a "grounded" take again, which it seems like it'll be.
I don't see why Dick can't be be 18 or a little older.This kind of sums it up for me. I want teenage Robin. Not little kid Robin. Not 20-something Chris O'Donnell Robin. 14-16 years old. We haven't had a believably teenage Robin in decades, and that needs to change. Without Robin 1) We never see the father/mentor aspect of Bruce's character and 2) We never get Nightwing. I'm sorry, but you can't skip the Robin stage and go straight to Nightwing. It's part of Nightwing's character development. He stepped out of Batman's shadow to be his own man. He can't step out of a shadow he was never really in, can he?
That movie also had her gunning down goons.Ah yes, that movie where an 11 year old has to watch her father burn to death in front of her.
100% a comedy, deeeeeeeeeefinitely.
That movie also had her gunning down goons.
I think a comedy can have serious, darker, dramatic elements.
I think it was more comedy aimed. I thinl Nic Cage's performance is a showcase of that. But I also wouldn't say that this movie is a showcase of non negative vigilante child raising.It had comedic elements, definitely. But it was more a drama with said comedic elements, rather than a strict comedy. It's about as much of a comedy as Spider-Man 1 or 2, in my opinion. It isn't the main point of the movie, it isn't necessarily just trying to make you laugh. Some scenes are, but not the movie as a whole.
I think it was more comedy aimed. I thinl Nic Cage's performance is a showcase of that. But I also wouldn't say that this movie is a showcase of non negative vigilante child raising.
Honestly if people are that bent out of shape about it then I don't know what to say. It's a movie set in a world where mythological gods exist, humanoid aliens shoot laser beams from their eyes, there's an entire underwater civilization and a billionaire punches gangsters dressed as a giant demon bat. I guarantee that 90% of the audience wouldn't sit there and go "Eew, Batman is, like, such a child abuser..." they would go "Oh ok it's Robin"No matter which way you frame it, Batman will still look like a child abuser especially if it's a "grounded" take again, which it seems like it'll be.
Reeves has picked two "unconventional" choices already in Pattinson and Wright. The conventional choices for Barbara are those aged 19-23. I say there's a good chance he'll cast an actual teenager (below 19).
My fan cast for Barbara (Amiah Miller) is younger than Dick (Finn Wolfhard). Come at me.Make sure you cast her younger than Nightwing, or someone is gonna have a meltdown