Why did you attack me instead of my arguement?
To provoke you to respond. Seems like it worked.
Uneccesarry use of montage can be seen in most of his work, Batman Begins has suffered the most from this in the public eye.
Of course, I too agree that the needless exposition in Begins was more than a bit annoying and dragged the film down a bit, but it's still not a travesty like you're crying about. I mean, with you chimps anything has to be either
divine or
disastrous. There is no middle ground.
I find it curious as to why you just go after the poster and not the post, this is not the place for this though, and we shall let it alone, I just hope we can have a discussion rather than you hurling insults next time.
And first of all, I find it curious as to why you are discussing a topic in the wrong forum.
And I find it curious as to why you had the thread we were discussing this subject earlier closed.
And I find it curious as to why you didn't respond to my arguments in the BB forum that clearly exposed your unsubstantiated and ill-conceived arguments for what they were.
And I find it curious as to why
your own condescending treatment of people who liked Begins by implying they are ignorant of the art of cinema simply because they don't have pretentiously sophisticated tas
My point however, is the practicality of the bike, a carapace of armour, to protect the rider more and the vital area's of the engine also.
If you hadn't indulged so much in your girlish sensitivities, you would have realized that I am not objecting to your opinion of certain aspects of TDK, but rather the shameless recycling of the same tired old points in a forum they don't belong in, points that were more than adequately refuted earlier.
I mean, have some dignity and at least stop lying to yourself. I know there are people who think that Nolan isn't the genius mastermind revolutionary some people hail him to be, but in all fairness he is still a very talented and respected filmmaker by all accounts in the moviemaking industry, both arthouse
and commercial. Accusing him of using gimmicks in his films only shows how downright illiterate you are yourself on the subject, considering the fact that the unconventional structure of his films (particularly Memento and The Prestige) is a deliberate choice and actually have a purpose, such as the reverse narration being used as a device for the audience to empathize with Leonard's condition in that they too don't know what happened before and are just as confused he is while in The Prestige, it's clearly utilized as a method of misdirection to keep viewers off balance which too is very much in keeping with the central theme of the film.
This, alongside many other arguments, have been dealt with in greater detail before, and I find it a rather incorrigible exercise on your part for needlessly repeating the same old drivel again.