• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

The Dark Knight Rises 'BATMAN 3' Is alive and kickin

I think we can draw certain conclusions about the nature of Batman 3.

The overall theme of TDK was easily summed up by the line, "the night is darkest just before the dawn. I promise you, the dawn is coming." Or, as Alfred said, "things were always going to get worse before they got better."

Chris Nolan even said repeatedly in interviews prior to the film's release that this was the theme of TDK.

So what, do you think, would Batman 3 be about? We're dealing with a trilogy of sorts. TDK is the ESB chapter, where everything goes to hell. The next film would be time to redeem Batman.

That's not to say that it would have to be lighter - noooo, no no no. But it would have to offer a resolution to the problems set up in TDK.

To this end, I firmly believe that a character like Selina or Talia is required. Not just because Bruce needs a love interest (he doesn't NEED one, per se) but because the love of a woman can redeem a tortured man, and he will need a tough woman who can stand toe-to-toe with Batman. Someone who would understand his dual life. Someone who might give him hope that he can have both, his life as Batman, and a normal life with a woman.

Naturally I think Selina is perfect for this because she's not exactly a villain, and not exactly a hero. She's like an inverted Batman, she completes him in a sense but they can also never be together. It brings a balance to that side of Bruce.

But you know, I had this conversation with Norm the other night and he pointed out to me that these films have always had more than one or two villains. Begins had Scarecrow and Ra's, but also Zsasz, Falcone, Earle, Flass... TDK had a bunch as well.

So it's fair to say that Batman 3 can use a handful of those other villains that Goyer refrenced, in a limited capacity. But we also know that Nolan won't use just any of them.

Norm and I agreed that with Selina in an ambiguous hero/villain/something role, there's room for someone like Riddler to take the major spot (Riddler done right - wouldn't that be cool?) and give Cobblepot a smaller role like Maroni - maybe as the self-made man who tries to take over organized crime in the city. It would be fitting that one of the more "freakish" villains would try to take over a role normally held by more normal bad guys.

I also think that someone like Deadshot or even Killer Croc could have a good role as a hitman hired either by Cobblepot to get someone out of his way, or by Edward Nashton to play a minor role in a complex crime meant to confound the Darknight Detective.

Personally I like Croc because he was born with a skin condition that gives him zero opportunity for a normal life. He'd have led such a hard life having to rob and steal just to keep food in his belly that when a bad guy offers him a fat stack if he'll scrag somebody, Croc would leap at the opportunity and become, well, a Killer Croc. This is pretty much the only way to use a character like him, who is all muscle and no brains, but if you have a place for hired muscle on the side of a freak-friendly high-roller criminal, why not use Croc?
 
Personally I like Croc because he was born with a skin condition that gives him zero opportunity for a normal life. He'd have led such a hard life having to rob and steal just to keep food in his belly that when a bad guy offers him a fat stack if he'll scrag somebody, Croc would leap at the opportunity and become, well, a Killer Croc. This is pretty much the only way to use a character like him, who is all muscle and no brains, but if you have a place for hired muscle on the side of a freak-friendly high-roller criminal, why not use Croc?


boring. :whatever:
 
That's all you got? "boring" and an eyeroll?

Why'd you even bother posting, Quinn?

croc is all brawn, no brain. i would not want to sit through 2 hours of an idiot with absolutely no interesting character motivation and development. i rather sit and watch how TDK's major puts his guyliner on every morning.
 
equilibrium007.jpg
:woot:
 
Riddler is hired by GCPD to identify The Batman who first bumps off Coleman Reece so that know one else can spoil the puzzle. An unknown Mob figure assembles a group of assassins to hunt Batman (Black Mask, Deadshot and Bane) Catwoman rises as a jewel thief.
 
Riddler is hired by GCPD to identify The Batman who first bumps off Coleman Reece so that know one else can spoil the puzzle. An unknown Mob figure assembles a group of assassins to hunt Batman (Black Mask, Deadshot and Bane) Catwoman rises as a jewel thief.

You suck! Lol, I JUST thought of that today! Good one.
 
So it's fair to say that Batman 3 can use a handful of those other villains that Goyer refrenced, in a limited capacity. But we also know that Nolan won't use just any of them.

It has to, right now everyone is assuming that Riddler is going to be the main villain in the next film. If this film is going to be Nolan's closing chapter on his series - on his own, Riddler just isn't a "climatic" villain in my opinion.

Unfortunately, the two villains that could carry a film on their own challenging Batman the final battle for Gotham are: Joker & Ra's.

A few months ago I suggested for the third film that Gotham had totally be taken over by the freak side of things is caught in a massive violent gang war between Cobblepot and Black Mask. With the name Penguin being a title Cobblepot hates and his enemies use in reference to him when mocking him. With Riddler causing some form of mischief mixed in there and Catwoman/Selena playing everybody.
 
Last edited:
Speaking of Reese, he is kind of a loose end isnt he ? With bats wanted for murder wouldnt Reese be subject to interrogation? wouldnt he be charged with obstruction of justice or something unless he gave up Batman's identity?
 
A few months ago I suggested for the third film that Gotham had totally be taken over by the freak side of things is caught in a massive violent gang war between Cobblepot and Black Mask. With the name Penguin being a title Cobblepot hates and his enemies use in reference to him when mocking him. With Riddler causing some form of mischief mixed in there and Catwoman/Selena playing everybody.

ugh, that idea is brilliant.:applaud
 
Speaking of Reese, he is kind of a loose end isnt he ? With bats wanted for murder wouldnt Reese be subject to interrogation? wouldnt he be charged with obstruction of justice or something unless he gave up Batman's identity?

He could say he was lying and only wanted attention or he only SUSPECTS who Batman might be. They could also say he died some time between the movies if need be. I'll admit it still seems like they should go somewhere with the whole Reese knowing his identity thing. When you break it down in the scheme of a trilogy, it seems awfully weird.
 
Riddler is hired by GCPD to identify The Batman who first bumps off Coleman Reece so that know one else can spoil the puzzle. An unknown Mob figure assembles a group of assassins to hunt Batman (Black Mask, Deadshot and Bane) Catwoman rises as a jewel thief.
That actually is a pretty good story idea. I'd watch that movie.

Boy I bet Christopher Nolan kicks himself every day for killing off Harvey Dent. Two-Face would have been the perfect villain for the next movie. Aaron Eckhart's performance was damn good.
 
It has to, right now everyone is assuming that Riddler is going to be the main villain in the next film. If this film is going to be Nolan's closing chapter on his series - on his own, Riddler just isn't a "climatic" villain in my opinion.

Unfortunately, the two villains that could carry a film on their own challenging Batman the final battle for Gotham are: Joker & Ra's.

A few months ago I suggested for the third film that Gotham had totally be taken over by the freak side of things is caught in a massive violent gang war between Cobblepot and Black Mask. With the name Penguin being a title Cobblepot hates and his enemies use in reference to him when mocking him. With Riddler causing some form of mischief mixed in there and Catwoman/Selena playing everybody.
In the novelization of TDK, they mention that Ra's Al Ghul's body was never found.
 
Riddler is hired by GCPD to identify The Batman who first bumps off Coleman Reece so that know one else can spoil the puzzle. An unknown Mob figure assembles a group of assassins to hunt Batman (Black Mask, Deadshot and Bane) Catwoman rises as a jewel thief.
:up:
I like the bit with Reese, and I think having the cops hire Riddler can lead to some really great shenanigans.

In terms of Mob figure, I wouldn't mind seeing Scarface and the Ventriloquist. Penguin would work, but it's what everyone is expecting. I'd like something different.

Also, how about the Mad Hatter? Doesn't that villain have "Nolanized" written all over him?
 
*bows* thank you



And you never see a body in Begins. If they can pull it off right, I would love to see Ra's back.


To be honest I would too. I loved Liam in the role and it's not like a villain can't be in more than one film.
 
croc is all brawn, no brain. i would not want to sit through 2 hours of an idiot with absolutely no interesting character motivation and development. i rather sit and watch how TDK's major puts his guyliner on every morning.

Um... Harl... please go back and read my post.

I said that Croc could fit in, in a SMALL role... I was talking like Zsasz in BB.

Not as a main character. Did I fail to make that clear? Or did you speed-read on me?

EDIT: Reading back it's clear to me that I didn't specify "small". I said "a good role." I meant "good" in a qualitative sense, not a quantitative one.

Somehow I didn't use the word "small" at all as regards his role. My bad.
 
Last edited:
It has to, right now everyone is assuming that Riddler is going to be the main villain in the next film. If this film is going to be Nolan's closing chapter on his series - on his own, Riddler just isn't a "climatic" villain in my opinion.

Unfortunately, the two villains that could carry a film on their own challenging Batman the final battle for Gotham are: Joker & Ra's.

A few months ago I suggested for the third film that Gotham had totally be taken over by the freak side of things is caught in a massive violent gang war between Cobblepot and Black Mask. With the name Penguin being a title Cobblepot hates and his enemies use in reference to him when mocking him. With Riddler causing some form of mischief mixed in there and Catwoman/Selena playing everybody.
\

Yeah, that's not too far from what I was saying... that's where guys like Croc or Deadshot fit in, being hired by guys like Penguin or even Black Mask (never been a Black Mask fan, though) to kill some dudes they need killed. Tiny tiny roles.

Norm's idea with regard to Riddler was that he, as Edward Nashton, could be trying to beat Batman at the crime solving thing and Batman keeps beating him... leading Nashton, as he comes apart, to eventually decide he should plot a crime so complex that Batman can't solve it. I honestly think that works very well as long as you have Penguin and/or Black Mask doing their thing along the way.
 
To be honest I would too. I loved Liam in the role and it's not like a villain can't be in more than one film.

I honestly think Joker was meant to return in the next film. The way I heard it was that Christopher, Jonah and Goyer during production of TDK had the trilogy already mapped out and I'm pretty sure it was one of them that said it. That leads me to believe it may be a while until we get the next film rolling because Heath's passing has resulted in a major re-imagining of the third from what they already had in mind.

\



Yeah, that's not too far from what I was saying... that's where guys like Croc or Deadshot fit in, being hired by guys like Penguin or even Black Mask (never been a Black Mask fan, though) to kill some dudes they need killed. Tiny tiny roles.



Norm's idea with regard to Riddler was that he, as Edward Nashton, could be trying to beat Batman at the crime solving thing and Batman keeps beating him... leading Nashton, as he comes apart, to eventually decide he should plot a crime so complex that Batman can't solve it. I honestly think that works very well as long as you have Penguin and/or Black Mask doing their thing along the way.


Hi Keyser. Been a while.
 
I still think Two-Face should have been saved for the 3rd film......:(

anyways.....has anyone heard the rumors that Eddie Murphy is going to play the Riddler? :huh::huh:
 
I still think Two-Face should have been saved for the 3rd film......:(

I disagree. Without Two-Face being handled the way he was, TDK might not have been as epic and fantastic as it turned out to be. Maybe they should have left open the possibility for Two-Face to return in the sequel, but saving him for the Batman 3 posepones the character's transformation and, in doing so, ruins the impact of his change. You shouldn't split character development like that between two films IMO, especially if you're unsure you're even making another film.
 
Love the latest news - Nolan says he and Goyer have come up with a story they're interested in telling, and that the 5 people Harvey killed is a possible part of it. Interesting.

Is Harvey really dead?
 
Love the latest news - Nolan says he and Goyer have come up with a story they're interested in telling, and that the 5 people Harvey killed is a possible part of it. Interesting.

Is Harvey really dead?
Yes. Yes he his.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"