Batman: Arkham Knight - Part 4

[zenith16]

This is not one of the latest or current comics. It's nearly 20 years old now. It's from 1996. So that refutes your 'putting a military spin on everything for the heck of it lately' argument.

oh it doesn't have to be recent ether it's be happei for a while now storm usi un ad cyclops also using one also happeg some years back now its been thing since the 90's still happens ow it's still that and if some want's to count it as canon or not. But alot of others can't stand some stuff like and it's conflict with it's self in the books too.

like that one where wolverine told storm that' be never hunt a dear mistreat it , but another writer had him send a threat to some one with a dear's head which made alot of the fa base mad at him ad he apologized later after he finally got it. alot of that stuff was happening for year's. late mid 80's through out the 90s ad still now with out of character stuff. or stories that conflict.

 

[The Joker]

oh it doesn't have to be recent ether it's be happei for a while now storm usi un ad cyclops also usi oe als happe some years back now its been thing since the 90's still happe's ow it's still that and if some want's to coout it as canon or not but alot of others can't stand some stuff ad it's coflict with it's self in the books too.

Oh you're changing your stance now, since your previous two rants were all about the current state of the comics (as if that would validate your argument just because you don't personally like it). Now it also applies to comics as far back as the 90's.

Yeah if you don't like it that's your personal problem. But don't try and sell the argument that it is unlikely or not right just because you don't like it. There's no conflict here. It's supported by the comic books in a story that was not controversial or unpopular or anything you're saying.

 

[zenith16]

Oh you're changing your stance now, since your previous two rants were all about the current state of the comics (as if that would validate your argument just because you don't personally like it). Now it also applies to comics as far back as the 90's.

Yeah if you don't like it that's your personal problem. But don't try and sell the argument that it is unlikely or not right just because you don't like it. There's no conflict here. It's supported by the comic books in a story that was not controversial or unpopular or anything you're saying.

not really this just brought up a major problem with the comic's which most people see as the character ad when some writer comes in and drive every one else crazy in that some how saw print cause a editor that didn't care . that's not how the character is usually is and is known. you brought i that stuff ad the reaction of a other poster of what's commonly known . there's always some one that come i n with some story that conflict with the main story arc the rest fan base chooses to for get cause of the fact it conflicts with the over all characters. he doesn't fit and talia hooking up with him where she wouldn't at all is that example.

this is why we have so may recontts and convolution

But I like better when you and I are on the same page.

 

[The Joker]

not really this just brouht up a major problem with the comic's which most people see as the character ad what some writer come in and drive every oe else crazy in . that's ot how the character iusually is and is known. you brouht i that stuff ad the reactio of a other poster of what's commonly known . there's always some oe that come i n with some story that conflict with the main story arc the rest fa base choose's to for et cuse of the fact it conflicts. he doesn't fit ad tali hooking up with him where she wouldn't is that example.

Yes really. There was no big fan backlash over this, either major or minor. So if you have a problem with this then you're a minority. Your argument on this holds no weight. If this was a controversial or unpopular storyline I might agree with you.

Second, your argument stemmed from saying I can't imagine such and such doing this just because they've never done it before. As if you can't find huge honking examples of this in the Arkham games either. I've never known Joker to try and make an army of monsters before (Hugo Strange is the villain that makes monster men in the comics). I've never known the LOS to use a walled off city prison project to get their work done before. I've never known Bane to be such a moron that he is defeated by an elevator gate etc. So when you starting saying the LOS never used tanks before, as if it's some horrible bastardization, your whole argument falls apart.

But I like better when you and I are on the same page.

I'm sure we will be again. Just not over this apparently.

 

[zenith16]

not really as I said its why we have s many reconnted stories and convolution happens. those people that made the story wonder why they haven't went farther in their careers as a known name like some of the comic greats

cause of events like that when the editor at the time choose's not to pay attention it has nothing do with me just not liking the story or anyone doing that it's if it conflict with how the characters are . it just mess's alot off make the story mess to it's audience.

As I said though.

I like better when you and I are on the same page.

Anyway I have a feeling this isn't Damien

 

[The Joker]

This story was not retconned. It was not controversial or unpopular. It was written by three of Batman's most popular writers; Alan Grant, Doug Moench, and Chuck Dixon. That's not my opinion, that's a fact.

Even you should be on the same page about that because it's true. If you don't like the story that's your own personal issue. A matter of taste.

 

[zenith16]

This story was not retconned. It was not controversial or unpopular. It was written by three of Batman's most popular writers; Alan Grant, Doug Moench, and Chuck Dixon. That's not my opinion, that's a fact.

Even you should be on the same page about that because it's true. If you don't like the story that's your own personal issue. A matter of taste.

what I'm saying is retconned is talia not wanting a thing to do with him and wouldn't touch in the manner he wants her to do. cause he's not the type she goes for. that's her taste as her sister in the show arrow not being into women all of a sudden . That's her taste.

As I said to get back to the game Anyway I have a feeling this isn't Damien. we'll find out who it is.

 

[The Joker]

what I'm saying is retconned is talia not wanting a thing to do with him and wouldn't touch in the manner he wants her to do. cause he's not the type she goes for. that's her taste as her sister in the show arrow not being into women all of a sudden . That's her taste.

That was not retconned either. They did not retcon that she had sex with him. She never pretended she was madly in love with him. She used him for sex. He was the one who developed feelings for her, but they were not reciprocated.

As I said to get back to the game Anyway I have a feeling this isn't Damien. we'll find out who it is.

Well who do you think it is?

 

[Broseph44]

It's Damian Zenith, not Damien

 

[Spider-Aziz]

Overuse of Venom made him age pretty fast.
That reminds me of the Venom episode from Batman Beyond.
Hope that costume makes it way back in this game.

 

[Hunter Rider]

The new trailer is good, cool to get a closer look at the Arkham Knight.

 

[Gamma Goliath]

Can't wait to see what the to be continued will show.

 

[BrollySupersj]

Can't wait to see what the to be continued will show.

I imagine it will be quite the scene. Judging by the way Batman widens his eyes at the end. He's seeing something that startled him.

 

[The Caped Knight]

So Dec 1 we get part 2 video nice, I guess it will be seen at the VGA awards

 

[Rodrigo90]

7 months...7...long...months

 

[BrollySupersj]

Idk if this specific age has been posted here, but man it gets me so excited for all the skin possibilities.

http://oi58.tinypic.com/xprcwy.jpg

The New 52 suit is pretty meh to me. Buty god the details....they're incredible. I really really hope the 89 batsuit will finally be included this time. This game engine would make it look soiincredibly beautiful.

 

[Gamma Goliath]

Yeah i hope they add all the skins from the previous games including the ones from origins. I couldn't care less about movie skins, but a BvS skin would rock.

 

[Whiskey Tango]

bwah ha ha this is freakin SICK! I got plenty of jollies from breaking dudes bones in the previous games but this one looks like it's taking things to a new level.

 

[Storm22]

I love the look and sound of Batman's cape in this game!

 

[Brother Jack]

bwah ha ha this is freakin SICK! I got plenty of jollies from breaking dudes bones in the previous games but this one looks like it's taking things to a new level.

Yeah, Batman's killing people now. It's so ill.

 

[Whiskey Tango]

Yeah, Batman's killing people now. It's so ill.

Aww I'm terribly sorry somebody pooped in your sooperhero funnybooks.

Besides, that guy is probably still alive. Probably.

 

[Whiskey Tango]

And while on that particular topic here's an article where the author shares similar feelings to yours: http://www.avclub.com/article/it-sure-looks-batman-uses-guns-and-kills-guy-arkha-212356

Personally, I think it's quite overblown. In a series where you can take a ball bat away from a guy and break it over his head (something that could easily kill a normal human) ramming a dudes head into a fuse box doesn't seem that much worse in comparison.

Batman disposes of henchmen by the truckload and does so efficiently and violently as he always has. As long as he isn't outright gunning people down or otherwise leaving a string of corpses in his wake (and this series has always shown defeated foes to still have heartbeats) I don't see a problem.

 

[BrollySupersj]

And while on that particular topic here's an article where the author shares similar feelings to yours: http://www.avclub.com/article/it-sure-looks-batman-uses-guns-and-kills-guy-arkha-212356

Personally, I think it's quite overblown. In a series where you can take a ball bat away from a guy and break it over his head (something that could easily kill a normal human) ramming a dudes head into a fuse box doesn't seem that much worse in comparison.

Batman disposes of henchmen by the truckload and does so efficiently and violently as he always has. As long as he isn't outright gunning people down or otherwise leaving a string of corpses in his wake (and this series has always shown defeated foes to still have heartbeats) I don't see a problem.

Pretty much this. Batman's attacks only look fatal in these games. But no one ever dies. It'll be the same again here.

 

[Broseph44]

And while on that particular topic here's an article where the author shares similar feelings to yours: http://www.avclub.com/article/it-sure-looks-batman-uses-guns-and-kills-guy-arkha-212356

Personally, I think it's quite overblown. In a series where you can take a ball bat away from a guy and break it over his head (something that could easily kill a normal human) ramming a dudes head into a fuse box doesn't seem that much worse in comparison.

Batman disposes of henchmen by the truckload and does so efficiently and violently as he always has. As long as he isn't outright gunning people down or otherwise leaving a string of corpses in his wake (and this series has always shown defeated foes to still have heartbeats) I don't see a problem.

Exactly, it's not a problem at all.

 

[Marvolo]

I'll admit the fuse box take down took me aback, but it's really not anything new for the Arkham Batman. He's left plenty of bad guys with brain damage. Breaking a bat over someone's head will kill a person. And anytime a human is knocked unconscious there is a high probability of some amount of brain damage. Arkham Batman is pretty ruthless.