First off notice how you never adress my point. That the movie focuses too much on the SUPER part of him not the MAN part. You adressed that people fear him and are against him which I have no issue with since that is among many obstacles is supposed to overcome. But in the end the movie is not examining Clarks upbrining and how while he has these amazing and fearsome powers he has grown up among two inclusive and empathetic people that taught Yes humans are *******s but we can change and you can help show them the way. They do throw in the by the number ******** monologues from Pa kent after the horrible parenting from him and Jor El but we never see Clark struggle with it or express in any way his opinions on it. MoS for struggles to actual capture Superman interesting and complex cobflicts and replace him with a generic whiny manchild.
I understood the point, and I still disagree. I've always felt that Kal was most certainly more "Super" than anything else. While he may experience deep and authentic human emotions and situations, he has a singular mission as a transcendent being that is always first and foremost in his life. The comics suggest that he might live and serve as a planetary protector for countless millennia. Despite the clumsy way that Jonathan Kent introduces this concept, it's still a valid theme. This realization carries more weight than any human problem that Clark Kent might face, which is what I found so appealing about MOS.
Wow....can't believe that Superman The Movie doesn't get more love from shh fans.
It's one of the originals. This movie created something special in my generation, but I guess I'm getting old and newer is always better.
Alas....the current generation will feel the same way when Superman Returns and Man of Steel are considered old and no longer "fresh". Always remember, your generations time in the limelight will come to an end.....and you'll wonder why.
I'm not bitter...nnaaaaaaaaa
Wow....can't believe that Superman The Movie doesn't get more love from shh fans.
Man Of Steel for me. I thought it brought Superman into the modern age perfectly, and with a bang. Cavill was perfect casting, the film looked fantastic, Zod made for a memorable and iconic villain, and the re-imagining of some aspects (Krypton's aesthetics, the whole genetics angle, etc) made for a more interesting backstory. It has its flaws of course, but what film doesn't? Overall it was just the perfect introduction to a modern Superman.
I was one of the camp who loved BvS also, but that's more a team-up movie than a Superman film to me.
As for Superman Returns, I just don't rate it at all. Nothing personal against Routh as he seems a nice guy in real life, but the entire premise was just a mistake from day one.
Trying to make a semi-continuation of Superman 1 & the Donner version of Superman II, whilst ignoring Superman III & IV, with a new actor who was obviously trying to channel some of his predecessor (Reeve), and with a new cast but re-using some old footage/audio (of Brando), and introducing a son whose mother had no memory of the conception, whose father knew he was his son but chose to remain at a distance, even thought he's meant to be one of the most upstanding and moral heroes of the modern age, and despite having the choice of a roster of amazing superpowered villains they went with one who's primary motivation is real estate ................... I mean, who on Earth sat down and read that treatment and thought, "now THERE's a great idea!!".