8Ball2/JanG5
Civilian
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
- Messages
- 956
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
Thanks for your thoughts, I was kind of hoping Wilhelm would have his say too.
i would have thought an encyclopedia would have given more specific knowledge rather than general knowledge. or at least a specific volume would.ampersand said:Wouldn't an encycopedia be better than that?
Odin's Lapdog said:i would have thought an encyclopedia would have given more specific knowledge rather than general knowledge. or at least a specific volume would.
hehe...you have a temper problem8Ball2/JanG5 said:War Lord, a lot of the stories in there are completely debatable, but DON'T start a bible debate in this thread. Make your own thread for that, if you have no other books to add than "the bible," then kindly **** off.
From Amazon.com
Carl Sagan muses on the current state of scientific thought, which offers him marvelous opportunities to entertain us with his own childhood experiences, the newspaper morgues, UFO stories, and the assorted flotsam and jetsam of pseudoscience. Along the way he debunks alien abduction, faith-healing, and channeling; refutes the arguments that science destroys spirituality, and provides a "baloney detection kit" for thinking through political, social, religious, and other issues.
8Ball2/JanG5 said:Enough, don't idle on the bible. It's too well known, I want to hear about things I may not know about.
Jonathan Archer said:Golf for Dummies.
The Bible.
no
I read part of genises and then just stopped about 25 pages in. Those works have detailed lessons to teach that I have heard summarized, but overall the whole thing just doesn't appeal to me. I want something more modern. Like, anything written after 1600 or so.
Thomas Paine's Age of Reason is highly recommended.
I'm a bit iffy on Paine's Rights of Man though