Bill Clinton smacking down Chris Wallace.

cass said:
I realize you're not the brightest crayon in the box so let me help you out:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wvo2lQe81xk&mode=related&search=


Cass, what the hell is wrong with you???

You take one quote, one simple quote that some other ass misinterpretated. It clearly says they didn't have the evidence to hold Bin Laden.

There are just no words for you. Why do you do that? Could you please come down from planet Mars and join us here on Earth?
 
Just remember that one day you will die and the things you remember will not be this stupid ass debate on whether or not Clinton sounded like an idiot on Fox News, everyone:whatever:
 
cass said:
You can have all the god damned ground rules you want, but if you're going to ask someone a tough question. Nay, question that persons decision making, and furthermore attempt to make them look like a fool in the eyes of the American people you better be prepared to hear an answer. If Wallace wanted some f***ing dodge or sheepish half baked apology like he come so accustomed to under this administration perhaps he should have rethought the interview. This is politics, not TomKat's new baby.
 
KingOfDreams said:
Not the entire media. Just Faux News.

You keep on crying about it, without any facts. After the last thing about "Republicans are mean, Democrats aren't though" I didn't think you could become anymore pathetic. But it's always nice to be surprised. :oldrazz:
 
Cass, hey cass. Come here a second.

Look, when we talk about Fox news being biased and full of rubbish and lies, we don't say that because we're lefties, or liberals.

It's the truth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w39FnpuMRfo

Can we just agree that Foxnews is pants? Can we agree on that much?
 
kainedamo said:
Cass, hey cass. Come here a second.

Look, when we talk about Fox news being biased and full of rubbish and lies, we don't say that because we're lefties, or liberals.

It's the truth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w39FnpuMRfo

Can we just agree that Foxnews is pants? Can we agree on that much?

You know anyone can gather clips of various quotes gathered over the years, a lot taken out of context, to make a point: see Michael Moore.

It's amazing that considering the various left-slanted newspapers and news channels, when one network appears to give voice to the other side, liberals moan and complain about bias. But don't pay attention to the NYT, Washington Post, MSNBC, Keith Olbermann, Dan Rather, etc.
 
cass said:


Where's that pic of a crying baby I see on here sometimes? It would fit. You don't have 'groundrules' for an interview. He may have been given an idea of what he was going to be asked, and in fact mentioned that he expected questionning about the CGI, but there aren't 'groundrules'. He was brought on to answer questions as he saw fit, that's what an interview is. Wallace doesn't like it, tough ****.
 
cass said:
You know anyone can gather clips of various quotes gathered over the years, a lot taken out of context, to make a point: see Michael Moore.

It's amazing that considering the various left-slanted newspapers and news channels, when one network appears to give voice to the other side, liberals moan and complain about bias. But don't pay attention to the NYT, Washington Post, MSNBC, Keith Olbermann, Dan Rather, etc.

Get it through your head. Stop thinking in terms of "liberal vs conservitive", "lefty vs righty". It's quite simply just about Fox being nothing but poison.

You want more evidence?? You want more evidence do you?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w39FnpuMRfo

I could do this all day. I could go get clips of Sky news, which is also Murdock sponsored.
 
cass said:
You know anyone can gather clips of various quotes gathered over the years, a lot taken out of context, to make a point: see Michael Moore.

It's amazing that considering the various left-slanted newspapers and news channels, when one network appears to give voice to the other side, liberals moan and complain about bias. But don't pay attention to the NYT, Washington Post, MSNBC, Keith Olbermann, Dan Rather, etc.


Rather doesn't do the news anymore, Olbermann is one show (a dumb one, at that), MSNBC hired Tucker f'ing Carlson, and The Times and Post have left-wing slanted opinion pages. If you'd bother to actually read them and not hiss like a vampire in the sunlight when you saw them (I'm assuming here), you'd see that they do what any paper is supposed to outside of those two pages or so that EVERY PAPER HAS, and that is report the news. Hell, I've seen front page Times articles with Bush basically looking like a hero. So don't whine about them when you can't actually defend FOX. It isn't gonna work. I've handled far more intelligent people than you in this subject.
 
kainedamo said:
Get it through your head. Stop thinking in terms of "liberal vs conservitive", "lefty vs righty". It's quite simply just about Fox being nothing but poison.

Apparently you don't know how to read. But if you ever acquire the gift of literacy, make sure to check out my post again.
 
God, this is so totally irrelevent.

Really, will it make any difference to the political future?

Ok, Liberals and Clinton fans, you win, Clinton is a badass and what he did was correct. FOX news is a massively corrupt network. You can now feel good about yourself and your opinions, regardless of how meaningless it is.

Ok, Conservatives and Clinton detractors, you win, Clinton went on a ******ed rant, and FOX news was perfectly justified in their actions. You can now feel good about yourself and your opinions, regardless of how meaningless it is.

See y'all under Reptilian rule!
 
Rush Limbaugh and Michael Moore will unite to eat the Reptilians' entire food supply, saving us all. I have predicted it.
 
bored said:
Rather doesn't do the news anymore, Olbermann is one show (a dumb one, at that), MSNBC hired Tucker f'ing Carlson, and The Times and Post have left-wing slanted opinion pages. If you'd bother to actually read them and not hiss like a vampire in the sunlight when you saw them (I'm assuming here), you'd see that they do what any paper is supposed to outside of those two pages or so that EVERY PAPER HAS, and that is report the news. Hell, I've seen front page Times articles with Bush basically looking like a hero. So don't whine about them when you can't actually defend FOX. It isn't gonna work. I've handled far more intelligent people than you in this subject.

Rather was in the industry for nearly 30 years, Olbermann is continually cited by moonbats, MSNBC has a conservative so they're not biased, wow, see Juan Williams, Geraldo Rivera, Alan Colmes, Greta van Susterann, etc so obviously Fox can't be biased! I read the Times, they way they present their articles and mislead them is obviously biased.
 
bored said:
Rush Limbaugh and Michael Moore will unite to eat the Reptilians' entire food supply, saving us all. I have predicted it.


Brunch in November, Late Lunch in December, Dinner in January.
 
cass said:
Apparently you don't know how to read. But if you ever acquire the gift of literacy, make sure to check out my post again.


Why are you being a jerk about this?

We're not talking about NYT, Washington Post, MSNBC, Keith Olbermann, Dan Rather, etc. We're talking about fox news. You wanna talk about how horrible and biased those are, make a topic about it.

But the fact remains you won't listen to the evidence here in this thread. Fox news IS horribly biased in favour of the republicans.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ld-yeoHtp0

"Thank President Bush it hasn't happened here yet" ?????
 
kainedamo said:
Why are you being a jerk about this?

We're not the NYT, Washington Post, MSNBC, Keith Olbermann, Dan Rather, etc. We're talking about fox news. You wanna talk about how horrible and biased those are, make a topic about it.

If you're so concerned about bias, why don't you?
 
While you guys debate the meaningless and make no progress, play those mind games and roll that really big stone up a really steep hill, could I at least listen to some Bernard Herrmann? God knows he makes everything tolerable.
 
If other news networks are truly biased they certainly hide it better than FOX does.
 
cass said:
Oh no, a guest has an opinion! How awful!!!!!!!!!!


Uh... she wasn't the guest.

Why can't you just accept Fox news leans as far to the right as they can get away with? It's so clear and blatent.

What about a former fox news producer talking about the political agenda of fox news?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wg3Hi2mN1fI
 
cass said:
If you're so concerned about bias, why don't you?


Because I'm not the one that thinks they're as biased as fox news. You are. So ****ing prove it.

Can you find even half the dirt that people dig up all the time on Fox News?
 
KingOfDreams said:
If other news networks are truly biased they certainly hide it better than FOX does.

I guess you could say that if you're a moron.
 
cass said:
Rather was in the industry for nearly 30 years, Olbermann is continually cited by moonbats, MSNBC has a conservative so they're not biased, wow, see Juan Williams, Geraldo Rivera, Alan Colmes, Greta van Susterann, etc so obviously Fox can't be biased! I read the Times, they way they present their articles and mislead them is obviously biased.

I would argue that Alan Colmes is not truly liberal but in fact a moderate. And I don't read The Times so if you could give me some examples that would great.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"