Bill Clinton smacking down Chris Wallace.

People like Rayne drive me ABSOLUTELY insane!!!

Why is it always "liberal this, liberal that" with you guys??

"Typical liberal loosing his composure"

SHUT THE **** UP!!!
 
hippie_hunter said:
Seriously after reading this story I was going "Boy, Clinton kicks ass!"


See, this is what I'm talking about. Hippie_Hunter is right wing. His opinions lean to the right mostly. And yet, he can listen to reason. Like the rest of us, he can see that Clinton defended himself very well.

Just because you're right wing doesn't mean you have to be a thick headed nutcase that shouts from a rooftop "liberal liberal liberal blargh blargh blargh".
 
Rayne said:
Listen, people, paint whatever picture you want, but Clinton could've killed bin Laden TWICE and didn't have the balls to do it. He could've prevented this whole thing by pissing off a few savages, but he didn't have the seeds. He just embarrassed himself on television for being as defensive as he was. Typical liberal loosing his composure and rerouting the blame towards Conservatives, even going so far as to actually use the term "neo-con". Yeah, way to unite'em, Slick Willy. I'm sorry the man couldn't just answer the question with class, but I'm not surprised, and I don't at all think he got the upper hand in this interview. He came out looking like an classless, bitter old man.
I'd like to see how you'd react if the media tried to make you look like a jackass on live tv.
 
kainedamo said:
People like Rayne drive me ABSOLUTELY insane!!!

Why is it always "liberal this, liberal that" with you guys??

"Typical liberal loosing his composure"

SHUT THE **** UP!!!

Individuals like Rayne are incapable of viewing the world as anything other than black and white. Any perception more complex that that causes him vexation and unavoidable listlessness. Therefore, to assume any form of function and originate any motivation, he must view the world as merely those two sides, lest he be rendered universally recumbent in enterprise.

Pity him as I do.
 
kainedamo said:
People like Rayne drive me ABSOLUTELY insane!!!

Why is it always "liberal this, liberal that" with you guys??

"Typical liberal loosing his composure"

SHUT THE **** UP!!!
Not to step out of line here, but is Rayne racist? It seems that way.
 
Yeah Rahne is freakin idiot with the MLK comment and everything else she said. What does Clinton's or MLK's personal life had anything to do with the jobs they did? What an idiot!
 
clinton rocked the house...hes the friggin man and always will be

folks word of advice.. just ignore rayne and cass when discussing politics.

they just dont get it
 
So why hasn't Bush caught Bin Laden yet? His administration said if he was confirmed to be in Pakistan they'd go in and get him, even without Pakistani consent or a heads up. But this year they disbanded a C.I.A. unit that was created to track him down. This is Bush's watch now. What's his excuse? It is a matter of record when Clinton left office he warned Bush about Osama.
 
Clinton pwned Wallace.

Wallace is a friggin' punk.
 
Also, this whole discussion is pointless. Clinton had no idea that Bin Laden would cause 9/11, so how can right wingers hold him accountable for not 'getting' him before hand? I never quite understood that argument. He didn't have a crystal ball.

Anyway, carry on...
 
Lazur makin anti-Clinton comments?! What a surprise! Didn't see this coming! :rolleyes: Your breath has to smell like Bush's feces cause you stay up his --- more than a thong!
 
Docker said:
Lazur makin anti-Clinton comments?! What a surprise! Didn't see this coming! :rolleyes: Your breath has to smell like Bush's feces cause you stay up his --- more than a thong!

And I also defended Clinton in my follow-up post. Did you read that? You know, it's called being OBJECTIVE, something you obviously know nothing about :rolleyes:.
 
Your past history of Clinton bashin still holds ground so you gets no apology. :o
 
Docker said:
Your past history of Clinton bashin still holds ground so you gets no apology. :o

I'm allowed to bash him when I see fit. I voted for him both times. So get off my back and get some perspective already.
 
I vote we pass a law that Clinton shall rule the world and all who disobey him shall go the ways of ol yeller.
 
I watched it and didn't think Clinton 'smacked down' Chris Wallace. I though Clinton looked like a lunatic. No one was accusing him of being responsible for 9/11, yet he responded as if that is what was being said. Most people are in agreement that there were mistakes and missteps made by multiple parties (in multiple administrations.).

Even Mara Liasson was taken aback at Clinton's tirade. Liasson remarked that she was surprised at how visceral his reaction was considering the question, which was, in her mind, a legitimate news question. Even Juan Williams didn't have anything to say in Clinton's defense... which is pretty rare.

Furthermore, this neo-con, right-wing conspiracy that he keeps asserting is against him just makes him more seem foolish, to my mind. Logically, why would they bother? There are far more 'potent' targets for any such a conspiracy. Clinton's over. He's peaked. He's not going to be holding office. He's not really part of the DNC leadership. All that's left is his 'legacy', and any reasonable neocon schemer would be far more worried about someone who was actually a threat to them maintaining power now, not worried about tarnishing Clinton's legacy.

He really just looked like a nut-case to me, and that's not something I would have said about Clinton prior to this.

Beyond that, we're talking Chris Wallace here, not Bill O'Riley. Wallace is hardly a neo-con mouthpiece.
 
Sloth7d said:
I vote we pass a law that Clinton shall rule the world and all who disobey him shall go the ways of ol yeller.
]

lol...see Vince Foster.
 
lazur said:
I'm allowed to bash him when I see fit. I voted for him both times. So get off my back and get some perspective already.
I like your sig... although I think the 'uncomfortable silences' should be changed to 'name-calling' and 'childish taunts'... or maybe 'name-calling' and 'virtual posturing'.

:)
 
lazur said:
I'm allowed to bash him when I see fit. I voted for him both times. So get off my back and get some perspective already.
You CANNOT bash Clinton! That's blasphemy! How you going to vote for him and bash him? That's like buyin tickets to a concert and booing him om stage.









You know, I just don't plain like you! :mad:



















:p
 
Daisy said:
Even Mara Liasson was taken aback at Clinton's tirade. Liasson remarked that she was surprised at how visceral his reaction was considering the question, which was, in her mind, a legitimate news question. Even Juan Williams didn't have anything to say in Clinton's defense... which is pretty rare.


I dont think we watched the same program. Juan Williams was defedning Clinton's remarks.:huh:
 
Sloth7d said:
I vote we pass a law that Clinton shall rule the world and all who disobey him shall go the ways of ol yeller.
You are a freakin giant among ants! A genius among high school drop outs! I follow your lead! I become your official bodyguard and back that motion.
 
Ben Urich said:
I'd like to thank bored for his signature. I now know to disregard anything and everything Rayne has ever said.
Thanks. :up:
*vomits at sig*
filthy common pig.
 
KingOfDreams said:
It's things like this that are the reason why I belong to the "Bill Clinton Is Still My President" Facebook group. It is a bit creepy though that he talks about killing someone so non-chalantly(sp?)...even though it's Bin Laden.



YEAH, I KNOW......EVERY TIME I READ THAT, I THOUGHT "SHOULDN'T A PRESIDENT USE WORDS LIKE "BRING TO JUSTICE", RATHER THAN BASICALLY SAY "KILL THE EVIL BASTARD"? :huh:


NOT THAT I DISAGREE WITH THE PHILOSOPHY, MIND YOU.....JUST STRUCK ME AS A TAD BLUNT. :dry:
 
lazur said:
Of course none of the Clinton backers would go to this link, right? Or if they did, they would outright dismiss what he said himself about letting Bin Laden go, right?

Bill Clinton is a has been, and he's not even good at that.
I went to the link. So let me ask you...what would be so hard about showing the actual video clip of the actual statement. Smells fishy to me.

edit: Apparently they refused access to the statement on video :rolleyes:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"