Bill Clinton smacking down Chris Wallace.

bored said:
Heh, cass has nothing to say. Just "Olbermann is a liberal".

Nothing else is needed when looking at Olbermann's record.
 
So what he said means nothing, just because he's a liberal? I mean, I don't like Olbie that much, but come on, that's just silly.
 
bored said:
Heh, cass has nothing to say. Just "Olbermann is a liberal".

And to play that card while anything Fox News puts out isn't even considered and gives liberals a chance to laugh is pathetic.
 
bored said:
So what he said means nothing, just because he's a liberal? I mean, I don't like Olbie that much, but come on, that's just silly.

His rampant bias disqualifies his comments on the subject.
 
god, i love this interview.

wallace is so shocked and is ripped to shreds.
 
cass said:
His rampant bias disqualifies his comments on the subject.
The same can be said about you and anything you say.
 
cass said:
Technically by your logic everyone therefore cannot speak on a subject since there is always inherent bias in what they say. I think, however, most people here who have defended Clinton used logic and reason to show how what he said was justified whereas you resorted to ad hominem and finger pointing.

Everyone has opinions. However if your opinions are not grounded and are not backed by reasonable and rational arguments then those opinions are just pure bias and are a waste of oxygen.
 
ShadowBoxing said:
Technically by your logic everyone therefore cannot speak on a subject since there is always inherent bias in what they say. I think, however, most people here who have defended Clinton used logic and reason to show how what he said was justified whereas you resorted to ad hominem and finger pointing.

Everyone has opinions. However if your opinions are not grounded and are not backed by reasonable and rational arguments then those opinions are just pure bias and are a waste of oxygen.

Not my logic. Superman's.

I've showed that Clinton's admitted to not doing what he could to get bin Laden, and that Fox has asked the same questions to the Bush administration. No ad hominem, and finger pointing there. Want ad hominem, see Olbermann's "special comment".
 
cass said:
How is it an example? He brought up a simple question. Clinton went on a wild eyed crazy rant, talking about the "right wing conspiracy". Wallace wanted to discuss the Clinton Global Iniative. Clinton wanted to keep ranting. How is it biased to ask a question?

Ha, yah I thought that was funny too. Clinton gave his answer and should've just left it at that.

Anywho, I thought it was a fair question. I'm sure when Bush is out of office he'll be getting the same questions and we'll all be back here having the same song and dance again.
 
Haha, I'm sure someone will though.

I heard one of the networks was comparing Clinton's hand movements when he was being asked about Monica to his hand movements in the interview. Anyone see that? Starting to scrape the bottom of the barrel on that one.
 
honestly, from what i can take from watching clinton in numerous interviews and appearances, at least it seems like he has a vision.

bush outside the safety net of his advisors has no vision and no clue on what he needs or wants to accomplish. fight terror, beat terrorism, be safer. kinda vague there.

do you honestly think bush would be doing what clinton currently is after his presidency?

i think not.
 
The Riddler said:
do you honestly think bush would be doing what clinton currently is after his presidency?

i think not.

I agree. All he'll be doing is clearing brush at the ranch.
 
JLBats said:
God, this is so totally irrelevent.

Really, will it make any difference to the political future?

Ok, Liberals and Clinton fans, you win, Clinton is a badass and what he did was correct. FOX news is a massively corrupt network. You can now feel good about yourself and your opinions, regardless of how meaningless it is.

Ok, Conservatives and Clinton detractors, you win, Clinton went on a ******ed rant, and FOX news was perfectly justified in their actions. You can now feel good about yourself and your opinions, regardless of how meaningless it is.

See y'all under Reptilian rule!
shut up.
 
Cyclops said:
But is he wrong?
It doesn't matter. A liberal could say the sky is blue and people like cass would cry it was nothing but liberal propaganda. They can't see the forest for the Bush in front of them.:whatever:
 
JLBats said:
God, this is so totally irrelevent.

Really, will it make any difference to the political future?

Ok, Liberals and Clinton fans, you win, Clinton is a badass and what he did was correct. FOX news is a massively corrupt network. You can now feel good about yourself and your opinions, regardless of how meaningless it is.

Ok, Conservatives and Clinton detractors, you win, Clinton went on a ******ed rant, and FOX news was perfectly justified in their actions. You can now feel good about yourself and your opinions, regardless of how meaningless it is.

See y'all under Reptilian rule!

I want to sign up as JLBat's Big Brother. :D :up:
 
Ah, to be young and hateful of both dems and repubs as we all once were. When you graduate from college, you start to slowly gravitate towards one or the other, and all the idealism you had is tossed out once you start working a full time job.
 
The Riddler said:
do you honestly think bush would be doing what clinton currently is after his presidency?

i think not.
Excellent point. :up:
 
Bill Clinton is an icon. This man rocks so hard. He's the first guy I voted for and he just radiates a cool factor that politicians don't normally have.

He basically verbally pimp slapped Chris Wallace, and deservedly, too. Faux News is so blatantly right-wing, and the sad thing is that they hide behind their fair and balanced theme which is basically fair and balanced to only one party.

I'd vote for Hilary to become president, for a number of reasons, but primarily to see the "Comeback Kid" made a long-awaited return to the White House.

Rock on, Bill Clinton! :up: :up:
 
cass said:
I will go there when looking at the questions he gives conservatives vs liberals.

he's a centrist. did you see his interview with rick santorum? he lobbed him softball questions too. he's not always on his game. it has nothing to do with political party affiliation, as much as you try and spin it that way.
 
cass said:
He asked the questions, it's right in front of you. And it doesn't take an idiot to look at the connections to see : bin Laden and al-Qaeda.

Keep ranting about "owning" all you want.

no actually, it's right in front of you.
completely different questions, completely different tone.
and those responsible for the 93 attacks where captured.

unlike Osama, who's allegedly responsible for 911
sure a dictator in a hole in his own country, doen deal
a huge diabetic man in caves ....huh where'd he go?:whatever:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"