Bill Clinton smacking down Chris Wallace.

[Mr Sparkle]

Funny, other people read the report too. That specific piece was all about 9/11 report findings. So, you have no point.

Financing was taken into account considering how assets have been frozen and Muslim "charities" which contributed are being shut down and arrested.

why do you keep editing my posts oh, yeah.....

actually, the 9-11 report shows YOU have no point, everyone sees it except you. seriously.
and financing was NOT taken into aco**** when mentioning "those responsible" sorry. again, either way, and like I said, under your line of reasoning Bush might get "some" of those responsible, but not .....







wait for it





ALL of them.

:factsninja: :madskillz:

 

[Mr Sparkle]

Mr. Secretary, it sure sounds like fighting terrorism was not a top priority.

And another of Clinton's lies:

P.S. Clinton said today:

They had eight months to try and they didn’t….. I tried. So I tried and failed. When I failed I left a comprehensive anti-terror strategy and the best guy in the country, Dick Clarke.

Let me remind you what Dick Clarke once said about what Clinton left behind, and whether the Bush Administration tried to do anything in eight months:

[T]here was no plan on Al Qaeda that was passed from the Clinton administration to the Bush administration.

Now, Clarke did say that there was a “strategy” in place, if not a “plan” — and in the spring of 2001, Bush ordered a review and some changes to the strategy, which had essentially been stale since October 1998. Fox’s Jim Angle summed it up this way, and Clarke agreed:

ANGLE: So, just to finish up if we could then, so what you’re saying is that there was no — one, there was no plan; two, there was no delay; and that actually the first changes since October of ‘98 were made in the spring months just after the administration came into office?

CLARKE: You got it. That’s right.

:factspirate:

seriously cass WTF?

:readingcomprehensionninja:

 

[cass]

why do you keep editing my posts oh, yeah.....

actually, the 9-11 report shows YOU have no point, everyone sees it except you. seriously.
and financing was NOT taken into aco**** when mentioning "those responsible" sorry. again, either way, and like I said, under your line of reasoning Bush might get "some" of those responsible, but not .....







wait for it





ALL of them.

:factsninja: :madskillz:

"Denial, denial, denial, moron!

:stupidremarkbutfunnybecauseitssostupid:"

 

[cass]

A comphrehensive "strategy" that hadn't been updated since '98 even though it was failing. No plan at all was passed. Clinton: failure and liar.

 

[Darthphere]

A comphrehensive "strategy" that hadn't been updated since '98 even though it was failing. No plan at all was passed. Clinton: failure and liar.

How exactly was it "failing"?

 

[cass]

How exactly was it "failing"?

It didn't capture/kill him. So it didn't achieve his goals, hence:failure.

 

[Mr Sparkle]

A comphrehensive "strategy" that hadn't been updated since '98 even though it was failing. No plan at all was passed. Clinton: failure and liar.

LOL cass, again...failed.

well Clinton said he left a strategy but all he left was a strategy!!!! what a liar!

yeah, you know what?
you're a joke and you're not worth my or anyone's time

 

[cass]

LOL cass, again...failed.

well Clinton said he left a strategy but all he left was a strategy!!!! what a liar!

yeah, you know what?
you're a jokeand you're not worth my or anyone's time

Keep it up.

 

[Darthphere]

It didn't capture/kill him. So it didn't achieve his goals, hence:failure.

So in the same sweep, Bush's plan or lack thereof was a failure as well, making him a failure and a liar.

 

[cass]

So in the same sweep, Bush's plan or lack thereof was a failure as well, making him a failure and a liar.

He's failing right now. Yes. But not a failure yet because he still has a chance.

 

[Darthphere]

He's failing right now. Yes. But not a failure yet because he still has a chance.

Until he gets him, hes a failure, there isnt a statue of limitations on failure.

 

[The Batman]

Even now, Clinton shows he's ten times the politician bush is. Its one thing to have a 9/11 happen and not catch osama. It's another to have a 9/11 happen, and spend most of you time on a war that most of the country no longer supports

 

[Super_Ludacris]

Even now, Clinton shows he's ten times the politician bush is. Its one thing to have a 9/11 happen and not catch osama. It's another to have a 9/11 happen, and spend most of you time on a war that most of the country no longer supports

Real Talk

 

[The Batman]

And instead of tackling the countries real problems....here we are...dogging a president who was already dogged 8 years ago over a stupid affair...making extremely inacurate movies by biased writers to try and drag his name through the mud some more.

Seriously, does anyone not find this ******ed?

 

[Super_Ludacris]

And instead of tackling the countries real problems....here we are...dogging a president who was already dogged 8 years ago over a stupid affair...making extremely inacurate movies by biased writers to try and drag his name through the mud some more.

Seriously, does anyone not find this ******ed?

That's what I was trying to say, it's like they've made so many excuses and now they wanna take the heat off the themselves and blame someone else but it's so pathetically transparaent that they look even more like a bunch of lames. And that TV movie was garbage

 

[The Batman]

That's what I was trying to say, it's like they've made so many excuses and now they wanna take the heat off the themselves and blame someone else but it's so pathetically transparaent that they look even more like a bunch of lames. And that TV movie was garbage

Exactly. It's not changing anything. People still dont like bush. PEople realize that he's full of ****. He wont ever catch Bin Laden. And then, he'll go down as a mediocre/bad president ("controversial" for the people in denial).

 

[ShadowBoxing]

It didn't capture/kill him. So it didn't achieve his goals, hence:failure.

Bush alloud him to fly planes into buildings then trapped him in a cage in Afganistan, pulled over 9/10th of the troops out, let Osama escape while he attacked a nation that had nothing to do with 9/11. He lied about their capabilities and connections to the current crisis. Not only that he was unable even to win the war in that country which is still plagued by the stryfe of insugrency (which apparently have been in their last throws for years now). During said time a Hurricanne hit the Unite States and due to our resources being stretched so thin it was very hard for the Federal Government to mobilized a response quickly. The Economic bubble, due to the amount spent on the war, is about to burst. His own party now barely supports him as his approval ratings dropped to below 35%. Oh and a report this week shows that the war caused more terrorism that was originally present in the Middle east.

Clinton could not catch a guy who had, as of then, done very little to the United States, and he is the failure.

 

[Cyclops]

And instead of tackling the countries real problems....here we are...dogging a president who was already dogged 8 years ago over a stupid affair...making extremely inacurate movies by biased writers to try and drag his name through the mud some more.

Seriously, does anyone not find this ******ed?

The Bush-Backers who need any kind of vindication they can get, that's who.

 

[Cyclops]

He's failing right now. Yes. But not a failure yet because he still has a chance.

He's not even trying. Osama is nowhere near George Bush's priority list. He'd rather **** the country of the guy who made things tough for his dad than go after the guy who launched the first successful foreign attack on American soil since technically the Civil War.

 

[hippie_hunter]

He's not even trying. Osama is nowhere near George Bush's priority list. He'd rather **** the country of the guy who made things tough for his dad than go after the guy who launched the first successful foreign attack on American soil since technically the Civil War.

Actually World War II and the Civil War was between a rebellious section of the United States that is still considered part of the United States so when the South attacked the North at Gettysburg and Antietam it wasn't a foreign attack, nor were they successful.

 

[Cyclops]

Hence why I said technically. I wasn't sure whether Pearl Harbor counted since Hawaii was just provincial territory at the time.

 

[hippie_hunter]

Hence why I said technically. I wasn't sure whether Pearl Harbor counted since Hawaii was just provincial territory at the time.

But the Confederacy wasn't even a foreign power. It was a rebellious section of the United States. Also Hawaii and all territories such as Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, Samoa, and others count as American soil since their soverignty is American

 

[Cyclops]

Hence why I said "technically". Eeyyyaagghh.

They declared themselves a foreign nation when they seceded, hence, technically, we were fighting with a foreign nation.

 

[ShadowBoxing]

But the Confederacy wasn't even a foreign power. It was a rebellious section of the United States. Also Hawaii and all territories such as Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, Samoa, and others count as American soil since their soverignty is American

Funny you should say this. In Southern Politics one of the premiere authorities on Southern Politics, V.O.Key, said what defined the South was "it is the only part of the United States to have been occupied by a foreign power".

 

[Mr Sparkle]

why do you keep editing my posts oh, yeah.....

actually, the 9-11 report shows YOU have no point, everyone sees it except you. seriously.
and financing was NOT taken into aco**** when mentioning "those responsible" sorry. again, either way, and like I said, under your line of reasoning Bush might get "some" of those responsible, but not .....







wait for it





ALL of them.

:factsninja: :madskillz:

I wasn't going to bother but, I'm going to complete the thorough owning of cass by merely pointing out the following.

the 9-11 report section on financing

in 2004 :

Washington - Despite nearly three years of digging through the "money trail" in the September 11 attacks, investigators are still largely in the dark about who financed the deadly assault on the United States.


and new stuff was popping up earlier this year

so, no Cass, Bush and the rest of his boys DON'T know who financed 9-11 for shure, therefore ALL of those responsible will NEVER be caught (by your own line of reasoning)

sleep tight buddy.