DarthSkywalker
🦉Your Most Aggro Pal (he/him)
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2004
- Messages
- 133,353
- Reaction score
- 81,241
- Points
- 203
But what about the mitigating circumstance of the stop in the first place? Has there been any indication that they pulled him over for a legit reason? Because there is only a confrontation because of a traffic stop that apparently was BS.I don’t necessarily disagree with the involuntary manslaughter charge but I think there’s mitigating circumstances like his resisting arrest and fighting with them and trying to get back in his car and the plausible concern that he could have had a gun inside. I don’t know what a rightful outcome is here, but I don’t think it’s a black and white situation (no pun intended).
Resisting arrest is not a death sentence. So I do not think it qualifies s as a mitigating circumstance here.
If she feared he had a gun, there would have been no reason to pull the taser. Whatever they knew about the man, they did not fear him having a weapon in that moment. If they did, the officer would have meant to pull her gun. She didn't. She meant to pull her taser. They rarely answer bats and knives with less then lethal force. There is no such wiggle room for a gun. She did not fear a gun in that moment.
