- Joined
- Dec 27, 2012
- Messages
- 19,918
- Reaction score
- 28,095
- Points
- 103
Honestly shocked by those that thought the marketing for this was good. It was so grating and showed what felt like a truly unappealing movie.
It's like a failed attempt at rainbow capitalism or something.![]()
Not sure I follow. What do you see the logic in?I see the logic. I mean the first trailer leaned heavily into the SNL skit. There may have been some retooling of the movie as well, as the one cringe Megan fan wasn't in the movie. As it is, I'm not entirely sure they even had Xerox Skynet when they cut the first trailer together.
Not sure I follow. What do you see the logic in?
The marketing for this movie did not match the original's. The first remembered it was a horror movie. That was the joke. This one tried to paint a T2 aesthetic where M3gan is your pal instantly defanging it.To the extent that they are trying to recapture what lead to the first movie breaking out. There is stuff in the first trailer that didn't make it into the movie, because I assume enough test audiences told them to cut it out. It is weird, I look at that first trailer, and I start to realize some of where the movie was cut up.
Then responds with what feels like the wrong answers.Respect to Jason Blum for talking about what went wrong immediately after.
![]()
Jason Blum Opens Up About the ‘M3GAN 2.0’ Flop, the Blumhouse Slump, and Bouncing Back - The Ringer
Matt is joined by Blumhouse CEO Jason Blum to discuss why his new film, M3GAN 2.0, significantly underperformed in its opening weekend, making only $10 million domestically; Blumhouse’s recent slump; what he has learned from this year; the state of the horror genre; and the highs and lows of...www.theringer.com