• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Bought/Thought August 11th, 2010 - SPOILERS

All the regular Marvel ongoings are available through subscriptions. Things like MAX, Icon, or any miniseries are not - then again, those are mainly the 3.99 titles.

As for the varients, yep - you're right, got me there. But the quality of the book? Unless your postman specifically tries to damage it, it'll come in mint condition. They ship the issues in plastic with a cardboard back to keep it straight, comic facing the cardboard coverside in. So it's really difficult to damage the issue. Marvel also has a return policy for damaged issues, so I'll give them that.
 
Wow. Scott Pilgrim did awful at the box office this weekend, even with all the raves from critics. I think the cheesy, campy trailer turned off most people from wanting to see it. Whenever it showed, I never heard anyone say, "I gotta see that."

On a side note, I rewatched "Unbreakable" this week. Man, that's a good superhero film that gets overlooked when people talk about great superhero movies. I remember when it came out, a lot of people were disappointed. They wanted more of The Sixth Sense, and they found the idea of superheros kind of juvenile. Makes me wonder if it would have been more appreciated today, now that so many comics get made into movies.
 
Unbreakable was a great movie. I didn't see it until a few years after it came out, but I've loved it from the first moment I saw it. I keep hoping for that sequel that M. Night was planning, but I doubt we'll ever see it.
 
Wow. Scott Pilgrim did awful at the box office this weekend, even with all the raves from critics. I think the cheesy, campy trailer turned off most people from wanting to see it. Whenever it showed, I never heard anyone say, "I gotta see that."
Meh, the movie was pretty fantastic, so I'm content with it. I plan to watch it again and I'm sure I'll ultimately buy the DVD or BR or whatever. The box office is disappointing, but it isn't a big deal, really. It told the comics' entire story in one film. What, were people hoping it'd get a sequel if it did well enough? ;)
 
Unbreakable was a great movie. I didn't see it until a few years after it came out, but I've loved it from the first moment I saw it. I keep hoping for that sequel that M. Night was planning, but I doubt we'll ever see it.

You'll be lucky to see M Night doing Pampers commercials soon. Man, has a director ever tanked as quickly as he has?
 
But, most comics you get from Marvel aren't available through subscription. I even called Marvel directly, telling them I'd like to buy every comic they put out each month, but wanted some type of subscription deal. They told me to check out milehigh.com and the like. Plus, I can't get all my variants through subscription...and, I can't make sure I get the best possible copy available, like at my shop.

I am morbidly curious how this telephone conversation ended up.

"I'm sorry, sir, but something like that is not doable. I know some fine websites for you to try for--"

"Dude, I am literally offering Marvel a wad of money every month with no middle man. Wouldn't this be a neat idea to try?"

"Huh?"

"Just, work with me. Being inventive, working around what has been done, for money that someone wants to throw at you."

"I am error."

"*sigh*"

Wow. Scott Pilgrim did awful at the box office this weekend, even with all the raves from critics. I think the cheesy, campy trailer turned off most people from wanting to see it. Whenever it showed, I never heard anyone say, "I gotta see that."

On a side note, I rewatched "Unbreakable" this week. Man, that's a good superhero film that gets overlooked when people talk about great superhero movies. I remember when it came out, a lot of people were disappointed. They wanted more of The Sixth Sense, and they found the idea of superheros kind of juvenile. Makes me wonder if it would have been more appreciated today, now that so many comics get made into movies.

At least "SCOTT PILGRIM VS. THE WORLD" finished in the Top 5 box office. To be fair, it chose to come out the same week as a macho man Sly Stallone action flick, and on the heels of Julia Roberts' latest chick flick. The inability to beat out the fifth week of "INCEPTION" is a bit harsh, though. The director did actually express interest in a sequel, but that seems unlikely.

It will also be about the 10th dud that Chris Evans has been in, a disturbing sign as he's the guy who has to get rears in seats for Captain America. At least Robert Downy Jr. was an acclaimed actor before his crash with substances and return in Iron Man; Evans at best is a midcard actor who hasn't had too many major film successes now tasked with carrying a major superhero franchise. He's enthused about it, but I'm curious how well it will work.

The trailers came off oddly to me. I got the sense of an arrested development teenage romance adventure that was throwing all sorts of glittery effects at me while offering me nothing I haven't seen in other movies (just smushing all of them into ONE movie). There is one trailer where Ramona's (or Scott's) lady ex is chewing out her wardrobe and Scott goes, "You used to be SO NICE!" and makes a face that can only be described as what a chipmunk looks like when it is trying to be angry. I genuinely wasn't sure if the reaction from me was intended to be a chuckle, or a gasp at Scott losing his temper, or what.

It didn't help that the actor who was chosen to star as Pilgrim has seemed to play a similar role in several other movies, at least in trailers. I can understand the studio didn't want to cast someone who might overwhelm the character with "his" own mojo, such as when Nick Cage plays anyone. On the other hand, they cast Cena for type, and he can't carry a movie alone yet. I also got an air of smugness from some of the trailers, like it was trying to be hipper than it's audience. As once said in an episode of SEINFELD, "smugness isn't attractive."

It's possible that the film is wonderful and this is merely a horrible error in editing trailers. That's not uncommon. Sometimes a film comes out and a studio has no idea what to make of it or how to market it - "BIG TROUBLE IN LITTLE CHINA" suffered this in the 80's. But it still doesn't help. I still have no interest in the property, and if I did, I'd read it in comic form, not rent the movie. If I decided to bite on Pilgrim, why not go for the source? It'd be cheaper to catch up on that than WALKING DEAD, that's for sure.

As for "UNBREAKABLE", to me that was M. Night Shamalayan's last good movie; afterward it has been all downhill. As if whatever magical pact with Satan to create "THE SIXTH SENSE" wore off very quickly, or he used too much of the elixir for his first film, and by his later ones he has nothing but residue left. I was surprised that it ended up being about a comic book hero coming to life (in a way) and it was perhaps a little ahead of it's time. It wasn't flawless, though; David Dunn's ability to manifest strength when he needs it is handled almost in too subtle a way, so you almost never are aware of it beyond for one flashback. I mean, being able to bench, heavens, almost 300 lbs for no reason is something that can provoke more eye rolls than gasps. It tried to handle the subject matter without turning it into an action movie. It also had one of those teary doe-eyed kids in movies that I think many audiences tire of. I can imagine the director going, "Alright, son, for this scene I need you to cry, and for this I need you to stare into the camera with big eyes, and for that I need you to stare into the camera with big eyes and cry." It seems kids in movies are either big eyed, quiet criers or obnoxious self aware wisecracking demon spawn. Some people are asking for a sequel, but I doubt it would work. Leave it be.
 
You'll be lucky to see M Night doing Pampers commercials soon. Man, has a director ever tanked as quickly as he has?
That's the thing, though, he's still getting all the backing he needs to do all kinds of movies still. I saw a trailer for his upcoming movie, Devil, before Scott Pilgrim. I swear to God, my friends and I were cracking up at the sheer absurdity of the plot halfway through the trailer. It's gonna be 90 minutes to 2 hours of people standing around in an elevator being terrified of something. I don't know how people keep deciding that his movies are good enough to greenlight. It's insane.
 
Meh, the movie was pretty fantastic, so I'm content with it. I plan to watch it again and I'm sure I'll ultimately buy the DVD or BR or whatever. The box office is disappointing, but it isn't a big deal, really. It told the comics' entire story in one film. What, were people hoping it'd get a sequel if it did well enough? ;)

How I feel, too. About the only thing anyone is interested in talking about in the movie forums is the ****ing box office. I mean, yeah, it's worthy of discussion, but it's like all anyone talks about. All kinds of stupid gibberish being thrown about, someone even started a thread about how fanboys need to stop expecting anything from these movies or whatever.

It's pretty much on par with an Edgar Wright film anyway.

That's the thing, though, he's still getting all the backing he needs to do all kinds of movies still. I saw a trailer for his upcoming movie, Devil, before Scott Pilgrim. I swear to God, my friends and I were cracking up at the sheer absurdity of the plot halfway through the trailer. It's gonna be 90 minutes to 2 hours of people standing around in an elevator being terrified of something. I don't know how people keep deciding that his movies are good enough to greenlight. It's insane.

I think he's only producing that one.
 
The Beat (www.comicsbeat.com) actually had one comment that did put it in some perspective. An indie comic that, when pitched to a studio, wasn't even complete managed to get $60 million for a big screen version that did within the Top 5 despite competing with Stallone, Roberts, and Chris Nolan's latest summer blockbuster.

"KICK-ASS", which was a modest hit in terms of box office, is killing on DVD & blu-ray, so much that Lion's Gate issued a press release to basically brag about it. It's possible (and likely) that "SCOTT PILGRIM VS. THE WORLD" will end up making a profit there. And considering that I have read zero of SP and maybe 5 out of 8 issues of KICK-ASS, I have no doubt the former is better, and I'm not even planning to read it. I guess the lesson is that a "quirky" comic flick that caters more to expectations of action movies like "KICK-ASS" will find an audience better.
 
That's pretty much how Wright's movies operated at the end of day. They bomb domestically, do pretty well internationally, and then become fairly big hits on home media. Admittedly, this one was much bigger budgeted than his previous films, but I'm willing to bet it'll be same in principal
 
Did Hot Fuzz follow that path? I thought it did pretty well in theaters, but I don't really remember any hard numbers or anything.
 
It made about 60 million worldwide, but domestically it only made about 15million (it's opening weekend in the States was a measly 3 million on a wide release). Then, yeah, it really took off once it hit DVD.
 
That's why I tossed out a mention to "BIG TROUBLE IN LITTLE CHINA". It's a big cult hit and modest pop culture reference now, but in the 80's, it bombed. It was only through home video and TV airings that it found it's audience and became popular. One could argue the same for 1999's "THE IRON GIANT" (which WB had no clue how to market) or even the original 1997 "AUSTIN POWERS", which was a modest hit until enough video sales and cable airings made it a cult hit, so the sequels did gangbusters. Kurt Russell once went so far as to claim that home video saved his career, because many of his films didn't do well initially at the box office.
 
Yeah, M. Night's newest trailer for Devil is getting a lot of laughs and moans in the theater...even with him only listed as the producer. It would have been better to leave his name off of it. Online, someone recorded a theater's reaction to the trailer, and it's the same as you and I had.
 
Oh, and he kind of reminds me of Kevin Smith. Smith had the excellent Dogma...and, nothing good has come afterwards. Clerks 2 had it's moments; but, it was nowhere as good as the first.

Surprisingly enough, I enjoyed Cop Out on DVD recently. Not a great film, but Tracy Morgan was hilarious in it.
 
And now....some actual reviews:

Justice League: Generation Lost #7

What a great title! It's the best of all the Justice League books, and this team of B-listers work so well together. The previous issue really drilled home the importance of taking down Max Lord, and this issue begins the major search for him. I loved when a couple teammates realized that Booster appeared to be leading the team and they thought how bad that sounded. And, Rocket Red...or whatever his name is...provides excellent comedy relief whenever he talks.

I dropped Booster Gold a few months ago. I got tired of time travel adventures that really didn't do much in the real DC timeline; but, this Booster is really good. :yay::yay:

Super Heroes #5

That's how the comic is listed through Marvel...but, this is really Marvel Adventures Super Heroes. Tobin does a nice story focusing on Captain America teaming up with Rhino. I love that in Tobin's world, the bad guys sometimes do good things. This issue is just a lot of fun, as Rhino calls up Cap to help him save a baby Rhino that is scheduled to be used for testing in a Hydra town...aptly named Hydrale. :yay:

Spectacular Spider-Girl #4

So much is going on in the past two issues, with tons of guest stars, as Defalco finally ties up his Gang War storyline that has been going on since May Parker's original series. This is so reminiscent of those 80's Spidey comics, where Hobgoblin took up so many issues; but, it kept the reader coming back for more. Also included is May's clone...or is May the clone?...but, we won't get the conclusion of that until next week, with Spider-Girl: The End.

We get a few deaths this issue, including The Punisher; and, the action was constant throughout. Really, really good stuff that I wish we'd see more of in the future. :yay::yay:

Rawhide Kid: The Sensational Seven #3

This is an odd book to review. I'm really enjoying it; but, not sure if I can say it's for everyone. With tongue firmly in cheek, Zimmerman has been following the Rawhide Kid (and, a very gay Rawhide Kid), as he recruits six other members to save the Earp brothers from an evil bandito. Each character has their own distinct personality; and, while I don't laugh out loud, I chuckle within constantly.

I remember many years ago...it could have been an early Marvel Knights comic...when Marvel made headlines by having Rawhide be a gay character. As I remember, that mini wasn't very good; and, the hype didn't really bring in big sales. This is much better. :yay:

Marvel Super Hero Squad #8

There are times I really...really...REALLY...wish I wasn't a Marvel completionist. (IS that the right term?) Most comics I enjoy reading and owning. (Even Loeb's Hulk. But, I do feel a bit the fool when I was buying three or four different varients of the same issue.) This comic has no value to me. It's not the least bit humorous, even by kid's standards. There are so many Marvel books that are ideal for children to be reading; but, this talks down to them. It's for an age that really wouldn't be picking up this book. Total garbage, and I would say the worst comic that Marvel currently puts out. :csad::csad:
 
Yeah, M. Night's newest trailer for Devil is getting a lot of laughs and moans in the theater...even with him only listed as the producer. It would have been better to leave his name off of it. Online, someone recorded a theater's reaction to the trailer, and it's the same as you and I had.
It wouldn't have been better. Maybe better for Shyamalan, but not for the movie. It still would've been about a bunch of people who sit on an elevator being scared for 2 hours. :oldrazz:
 
It wouldn't have been better. Maybe better for Shyamalan, but not for the movie. It still would've been about a bunch of people who sit on an elevator being scared for 2 hours. :oldrazz:

Hasn't Bendis written 6 issue arcs on flimsier subjects? ;)
 
Spectacular Spider-Girl #4

So much is going on in the past two issues, with tons of guest stars, as Defalco finally ties up his Gang War storyline that has been going on since May Parker's original series. This is so reminiscent of those 80's Spidey comics, where Hobgoblin took up so many issues; but, it kept the reader coming back for more. Also included is May's clone...or is May the clone?...but, we won't get the conclusion of that until next week, with Spider-Girl: The End.

We get a few deaths this issue, including The Punisher
; and, the action was constant throughout. Really, really good stuff that I wish we'd see more of in the future. :yay::yay:

Yeah, I swear I wanted to kiss DeFalco right on the mouth when that happened. I didn't think he'd actually do it, alternate future or not, but he did, and I wanted to cheer. Admittedly, I wasn't as annoyed at him in this storyarc than I generally am, but it's the gesture of the thing that counts. :yay:
 
Yeah, I swear I wanted to kiss DeFalco right on the mouth when that happened. I didn't think he'd actually do it, alternate future or not, but he did, and I wanted to cheer. Admittedly, I wasn't as annoyed at him in this storyarc than I generally am, but it's the gesture of the thing that counts. :yay:

I liked his dig he gives in that issue when MJ compares being married to Spider-Man like being married to a police officer or fireman, a point brought up on these boards when others argue Spidey can't be married, and she knew it and "wouldn't change a thing." :yay:
 
Not the first time DeFalco has taken subtle digs at the current status quo, but always a treat when he does.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"