Dread
TMNT 1984-2009
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2001
- Messages
- 21,788
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Yup... vain. You're trying it didn't do anything toward my choice to give it a shot.
I was just curious. Vanity is a sin, after all. I'll be wise to dismiss it.
I honestly believe that Marvel should put out a Spider-man Forever book that continues with MJ and Peter being married. It would be interesting to see which one sells the most
It wouldn't sell at all. SPIDER-GIRL continued on a similar vein and it sold very poorly for a very long time; so poorly that as much as Tom DeFalco mourns the end of it, he's lucky he had a 10-12 year run on it. X-MEN FOREVER 2 is being canned at issue #16 because it isn't much of a draw. More to the point, Spider-Man's franchise right now isn't strong enough to support too much side material these days.
Sorry, Dread, but I too've been sampling ASM here and there. The earlier stuff far after the fact thanks to discount bins (an abundance of those in there, surprise surprise) and a few of the post-600s for various reasons (Black Cat fan, MJ's "return," Ben Reilly's "return," etc...) For now, I'm back for Slott's run. As long as there's no manchild Peter and they keep the Peter/Nora stuff to a MINIMUM I'll be happy. And get rid of Ramos. Sorry, but the dude does NOT belong on a superhero title.
I haven't minded Ramos' art on ASM to be honest. He is a bit wonky with the "human" characters but he's great for the ones who look inhuman, like Hobgoblin. And to be honest, what has impressed me about BIG TIME is Slott moving forward with Peter's career and superhero stuff, not the romance. I could care less about Carlie. I know they can never go steady, marry, and if they did it would not last. There's an invisible barrier around Spidey's love life ever since the end of 2007. If that was the sole subplot of BIG TIME, I'd have been turned off. But it isn't, and the rest of it has entertained me greatly.
And in a way it is a shame to Slott and the other writers who handled Carlie that I feel that way. It's not their fault. Editorial decided the marriage had to be yanked out, root and stem, not them. If Alan Moore had been tasked to write ASM after OMD, he would have had to deal with it. I mean Carlie on the surface isn't a bad character; a cute CSI and all that. Her design does remind me a little of Gwen Stacy from the "SPECTACULAR SPIDER-MAN" cartoon, but it's not like Spidey has never dated a brainy blond with glasses before (Debra Whitman). Heck, if you consider Felicia Hardy a "platinum blond" as some Handbooks do, most of Spidey's girlfriends have been blond aside for MJ and Betty Brant. But the side effect of erasing the marriage is that it does very clearly set a standard for the limitations of Spidey's love life at least for this EIC and senior editing staff, and opens the door for the next EIC and staff to muck with whatever they inherit. Now, if Joe Q genuinely feels a wedding issue to Carlie could see such a huge boost in sales that it is worth it, it would totally be in character for him to authorize it and then pretend none of his prior Spidey marriage statements were valid.
BIG TIME, though, offers a lot more to me than yet another romantic subplot. I like that Peter's ties to the mayor through May are being used wisely. I like the idea of him working for a bizarre think tank. I like the moves being done with his villains and I like that Black Cat is a regular supporting character again. I like that Slott isn't ignoring all of Spidey's ties to the superhuman community but has mined them for ore. Plus, aside for one "bwahaha, marriage!" joke at the start of BIG TIME, it's not being hammered into my brain for laughs, so it's not "offensive". Two years is a long time to be angry about a story and now that Slott was THE solo dude on the title and I've seriously always wanted to read him on ASM, I figured Big Time was the time. And I haven't been displeased yet. That's more than I can say for a few other Marvel books lately that I've been on longer.
Last edited: