Brave and the Bold Casting Thread

I still think there was a hot second when it was a possibility. Someone asked Jake about it and I don’t recall exactly what his response was but it made me think there’s a story there.
 
Once that script is ready to be read, I imagine lots of 40-55 year olds will read it with open arms. Jake could easily be in there. Fans and journalists love to talk about saturation, but this is still Batman. If it hits, that’s a solid job for 5-10+ years and a lot of guys that age have kids they’d love to cater to; financially and on the big screen.
 
Once that script is ready to be read, I imagine lots of 40-55 year olds will read it with open arms. Jake could easily be in there. Fans and journalists love to talk about saturation, but this is still Batman. If it hits, that’s a solid job for 5-10+ years and a lot of guys that age have kids they’d love to cater to; financially and on the big screen.
Older Batman is a sick aging movie star retirement gig.
 
Reposting again because it’s too good for the bottom of the page, the casting works and that emblem could be a good choice for the DCU (although I’m still hoping for an oval)…

IMG_5207.jpeg
 
IMG_5211.jpeg

I appreciate the enthusiasm, but I just don’t see it. Can I offer you Captain Atom or X-Men’s Beast instead?
 
Yeah. I'd support him if he got it, but I'm just really struggling to see it.
 
"I would do it for free" This is how we know he knows it won't ever happen. Any actor who has a real shot at it isn't going to give away their leverage in the negotiations like that.
 
Alan Ritchson batman

F644QA7aEAAtBSr.jpg:large
 
I wouldn't be mad if Jarvis got the part, but I'd rather see him as Ra's. I also don't hate Ritchson as an actor, but he doesn't feel right for Batman. He comes off as more of an all-American type vs. the European, aristocratic vibe I typically prefer for Bruce. He can play Guile in that Steet Fighter flick though.
 
Alan Ritchson would be the worst Batman ever cast by orders of magnitude. There is not a single thing about him that suits the character. I think he's too blandly uninteresting to play Jack Reacher - a character of so little substance his only real trait is that he's really tall drawn from source material that is about half a step up from reading toilet paper - let alone Batman.
 
I wouldn't be mad if Jarvis got the part, but I'd rather see him as Ra's. I also don't hate Ritchson as an actor, but he doesn't feel right for Batman. He comes off as more of an all-American type vs. the European, aristocratic vibe I typically prefer for Bruce. He can play Guile in that Steet Fighter flick though.
To be fair, Bruce is as American as they come, with roots that date back to the Revolutionary War. But I get what you're saying about Ritchson. He's more of a sporty meathead type, which is a far cry from the sophisticated and well-bred depictions of Bruce that we've seen in the past. The only reason I can even think of for Ritchson being part of the conversation is his physique, which is comparable to how certain artists like Mikel Janin portray Bruce in the comics. For my part, though, I'd rather that Batman not look anywhere near that roided out. lol

You know, as much as I'm excited to see Damian Wayne and other Batman Family members on screen for the first time, I think it's unfortunate that his presence in B:TBatB somewhat restricts the pool of actors vying for the role of Batman to those who are 35 and under.

Considering Jason Elordi's recent comments that Gunn's Superman is "too dark," I'm not sure if he would be open to trying out for Batman, but I keep coming back to him as a great potential candidate. His multifaceted turn as Nate Jacobs on Euphoria S1 is still the best example of what he could ultimately bring to the role. Jacobs is one part Christian Bale in American Psycho (all dark and enigmatic) and another part All-American social animal. He moves fluidly between the two polar opposite types, much like Bruce does with his Batman and "playboy" personas. The problem, which brings us back to my earlier concern, is that he's only 27. Granted, he'll be closer to 30 or 31 by the time the film rolls around (and he does look a bit older than his actual age), but I don't know if Gunn would consider someone that young for a seasoned Batman with an adolescent son.

The only other option I like is one who hasn't been mentioned here in a while: Lee Pace. I don't know if his name has been somewhat tarnished by a certain former Hype member making it a little too, shall we say, ubiquitous on the Internet these days lol, but I still think he's a solid choice for an older version of the character.

I'm not fully sold on Ethan Peck just yet, but he checks all the right boxes. So, I can definitely see him in the running for this.
 
Jacob Elordi is amazing casting (still wish he’d been Superman if they had to cast a young white guy) but feels way too out of Gunn’s wheelhouse. Lee Pace is probably a best case scenario for me knowing Gunn’s casting instincts, great choice.

I do think it’s very funny that for ‘serious’ speculation you actually genuinely do have to assume anyone under like 6,4 has zero chance at being cast because Gunn is a lazy director and height pervert.
 
Jacob Elordi is amazing casting (still wish he’d been Superman if they had to cast a young white guy) but feels way too out of Gunn’s wheelhouse. Lee Pace is probably a best case scenario for me knowing Gunn’s casting instincts, great choice.

I do think it’s very funny that for ‘serious’ speculation you actually genuinely do have to assume anyone under like 6,4 has zero chance at being cast because Gunn is a lazy director and height pervert.
Pace would be awesome. I'm worried they'd consider him him too old but we've seen few middle-aged guys cast in action roles as of late so maybe his age wouldn't be a dealbreaker nowadays.
 
Pace would be awesome. I'm worried they'd consider him him too old but we've seen few middle-aged guys cast in action roles as of late so maybe his age wouldn't be a dealbreaker nowadays.
I also sincerely wonder if controversy adverse WB execs would be extremely hesitant to cast a gay actor as Batman. The DCU is massively subpar in terms of diversity already and that speaks to a certain unwillingness to court any potential Loudness From Certain Corners, imo.
 
I also sincerely wonder if controversy adverse WB execs would be extremely hesitant to cast a gay actor as Batman. The DCU is massively subpar in terms of diversity already and that speaks to a certain unwillingness to court any potential Loudness From Certain Corners, imo.
That's a good point. Especially seeing how many corporations are trying to curry favor with the current administration.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"