And then at some point it feels like actors don't chance how they look for a decade or so. I saw this commercial with Hugo Weaving, and I can't believe his characters still looks like he did in The Matrix movies.
True. Though to be fair, Weaving and Depp are friggin chameleons anyway :haha:
But yes exactly -- I don't really see the big deal with different actors playing the same character at different ages.
I don't mind different actors at all when they're not in the same movie.
To be honest, it's a much better idea than going the Brad Pitt / Benjamin Button way of things.
If I see James McAvoy and Patrick Stewart in the same frame at the theater I can tell you now it's gonna take me out of the movie. I'm gonna be subconsciously thinking that James' Xavier had plastic surgery to get the thin lips of Patrick's Xavier. Along with a nose job, etc. Really, they don't even remotely favor. They just really couldn't look more different.
So the X-Men story itself, the Sentinels, the fact that OT and FC are being brought together -- all of that wouldn't matter at all if you see McAvoy and Stewart in the same frame? Isn't that a bit extreme? That will not get you peace my friend...
Omg! That SO reminds me of his Wolverine and the X Men look... The same series where Xavier communicated telepathically from the future to save the world... Hmmm
YES! Though, to be honest, I hope that even if he's comunicating from the future, it's only with his younger self or something. I dunno.
singer isn't ignoring X3 he has made that pretty clear so how can he ignore that scene like it never happened, it would stand out as being odd
does seem like he will be pretty respectful to X3...
If we consider the possibility that Prof. X is merely a psychological projection in the DoFP future post-X3, it doesn't matter if he has a twin or whoever that comatose guy was at X3. And plus, he's a telepath, he could make everyone see him in his old form anyway -- if that's indeed the case, it'd make for an interesting dialogue between him and Mystique (whose own discomfort with appearances would be a welcome character analysis or some such).
What I love is that Singer isnt'
disregarding anything and still trying to make this work. Kudos on him for doing that -- the X-Men film franchise is fast becoming a continuity terror that's similar to its comic-counterpart, as well as having spin-off-titles and crossovers (didn't the X-Men start that trend off or something?) So yeah. All good.
I'm fine with the twin swap thing. This film is about "fixing" things anyway and truth be told at least 2 of those X3 deaths shouldn't have happened anyway.
No. See, a film should be a film about something else, not about "fixing the franchise" -- if that's the purpose then they shouldn't be making the movie. They should start from a story they feel like they've found worth telling, and yes, they have. The entirety of X3 shouldn't have happened, but it seems like Singer is manning up and saying "well tough luck guys, it did. Now let's see what we can still do with this thing."
I don't mind it one bit.