Retroman said:Didn't i just post this bit of news hours ago a couple posts back?No one cares.
![]()
Its okay man. No hard feelings.TripleF said:My apologies, I do care, I promise. I just didn't see it. I saw it for the first time on the other forum.

Retroman said:Its okay man. No hard feelings.![]()

Retroman said:He he.
Lets hope that this film is not as butchered as the last one. I don't blame Hoy for what happened on FF1 btw.
Retroman said:At the end of the day we all are.![]()
TripleF said:There is a god!!!!!!!!
THANKS TO MATT AT http://www.f4movies.com/
I know of one particular fan that will be EXTREMELY HAPPY with this news. Can't wait to tell her.![]()

zer00 said:Well hopefully he'll actually be allowed to do his job this time. And no other Fox editors will come in and re-edit the film as what has happened with DD, FF etc.
Retroman said:Daredevil theatrical vs Daredevil Directors Cut is like watching two completely different movies. Fox had a lot to do with the editing of that movie. I think director MSJ said on the commentary that they basically wanted a faster paced more Garner and less swearing and violence (to keep PG-13 rating). So about half an hour was sliced from that film.
If you've seen the deleted scenes for FF1 you'd be inclined to think the studio had something to with editing of that film as well.
Shorter running time & PG-13 rating = more screenings per day = more money = Fox happy = fan happy?!?
zer00 said:It's too hard to judge via sequel(even though it was Fox in th)e case of FF) considering a deal could have and probably was made.
zer00 said:Why Blame Story though? He reallyt has nothing to do with it. He's not being allowed. Hell, even Ridley Scott couldn't get his actual cut of the movie out of Fox.
That's why I assume, and hope that Marvel and Story struck a deal where they can't be ****ed around with. It certainly seems like Story has more power this time around. Jones playing SS. Real Doom. So hopefully in regards to editing. The director is actually allowed to go into the little room.
TripleF said:He has always been a big part of the editing in his other films. I was surprised that he wasn't for the first. After what happened with his film this last time, I don't think they will be able to keep him out of the editing room. As far as "Barbershop" he was a part of every aspect of that movie from the writing, to the filming to the editing. That has been his biggest critical success thus far, I have a feeling he will be a part. If not, if he doesn't fight to get his film, then he doesn't have the balls to be a big time director of a blockbuster, IMO.
antariksh said:OK so that means Ridley scott has no balls and is no big time director because he wasn't allowed to have the KOH movie he wanted.![]()
and I thougth ridley was a big time A director.
TripleF said:He has always been a big part of the editing in his other films. I was surprised that he wasn't for the first. After what happened with his film this last time, I don't think they will be able to keep him out of the editing room. As far as "Barbershop" he was a part of every aspect of that movie from the writing, to the filming to the editing. That has been his biggest critical success thus far, I have a feeling he will be a part. If not, if he doesn't fight to get his film, then he doesn't have the balls to be a big time director of a blockbuster, IMO.
Lightning Strikez! said:Agreed.
It's interesting when directors like Tim Story or Bryan Singer either edit their own films or utilize their preferred choice of editors (i.e. John Ottman for Singer's X2) the films have a more seamless, stylized feel.
In contrast, when you get the studio-mandated William Hoy type-editors involved, things go to hell--complete with ADD-paced, choppy work. X3, FF1, and Daredevil are prime examples of that.
The question is...has Fox learned from their mistakes in the past? It's one thing to dupe viewers the first time, and have them walk away from the theatre's dissatisfied and grumbling. You've got their money and that's that. But those audiences will NOT be fooled a second time. If word breaks that FF2 is more of the same, we can expect a total bomb based on word-of-mouth. So what will the studio do differently to gain their confidence back?
PyroChamber said:Are the deleted scenes online anywhere?