cin0
Atl's Finest
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,060
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
You clearly know **** all about Cher then. No, she isn't a full time actress, but shes more of an actress than Fox is. Shes a really good one too.
She could have made a good Catwoman in the 60's or something.
u showed me complete disrepect and u cleary misunderstood wat i was sayin. the point is she hasnt played any real parts in movie or televison lately. she may have been a good actress back in the day but choosin her would be just as bad as choosin some random 61 year-old lady IMO. megan fox's acting is improving and she really was that bad to begin with, i think people just exaggerate how bad her acting is. my whole reason for posting that was to see who would u rather be picked: an old lady who isnt even sexy and really doesnt do much acting, or someone that would actually look good in whatever she was waring and could actually be believable as that chacter.

Sure its your opinion and your entitled to it but it really makes no sense